Literature DB >> 29161762

Temperature-dependent body size effects determine population responses to climate warming.

Max Lindmark1, Magnus Huss1, Jan Ohlberger2, Anna Gårdmark1.   

Abstract

Current understanding of animal population responses to rising temperatures is based on the assumption that biological rates such as metabolism, which governs fundamental ecological processes, scale independently with body size and temperature, despite empirical evidence for interactive effects. Here, we investigate the consequences of interactive temperature- and size scaling of vital rates for the dynamics of populations experiencing warming using a stage-structured consumer-resource model. We show that interactive scaling alters population and stage-specific responses to rising temperatures, such that warming can induce shifts in population regulation and stage-structure, influence community structure and govern population responses to mortality. Analysing experimental data for 20 fish species, we found size-temperature interactions in intraspecific scaling of metabolic rate to be common. Given the evidence for size-temperature interactions and the ubiquity of size structure in animal populations, we argue that accounting for size-specific temperature effects is pivotal for understanding how warming affects animal populations and communities.
© 2017 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by CNRS and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  Allometric scaling; climate change; communities; consumer-resource dynamics; dynamic modelling; food webs; intraspecific competition; metabolic rate; predator-prey interactions; size structure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29161762     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  18 in total

1.  Temperature and predator cues interactively affect ontogenetic metabolic scaling of aquatic amphipods.

Authors:  V Gjoni; A Basset; D S Glazier
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Morphology-based differences in the thermal response of freshwater phytoplankton.

Authors:  Angel M Segura; Florencia Sarthou; Carla Kruk
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Activity alters how temperature influences intraspecific metabolic scaling: testing the metabolic-level boundaries hypothesis.

Authors:  Douglas Stewart Glazier
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Temperature variability alters the stability and thresholds for collapse of interacting species.

Authors:  Laura E Dee; Daniel Okamtoto; Anna Gårdmark; Jose M Montoya; Steve J Miller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Probing the Ecology and Climate of the Eocene Southern Ocean With Sand Tiger Sharks Striatolamia macrota.

Authors:  Sora L Kim; Sarah S Zeichner; Albert S Colman; Howie D Scher; Jürgen Kriwet; Thomas Mörs; Matthew Huber
Journal:  Paleoceanogr Paleoclimatol       Date:  2020-12-08

6.  Revisiting GUD: An empirical test of the size-dependency of patch departure behaviour.

Authors:  Francesco Cozzoli; Giovanna Ligetta; Fabio Vignes; Alberto Basset
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Strong Evidence for an Intraspecific Metabolic Scaling Coefficient Near 0.89 in Fish.

Authors:  Christopher L Jerde; Krista Kraskura; Erika J Eliason; Samantha R Csik; Adrian C Stier; Mark L Taper
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Experimental evidence of gradual size-dependent shifts in body size and growth of fish in response to warming.

Authors:  Magnus Huss; Max Lindmark; Philip Jacobson; Renee M van Dorst; Anna Gårdmark
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Experimental evolution of phytoplankton fatty acid thermal reaction norms.

Authors:  Daniel R O'Donnell; Zhi-Yan Du; Elena Litchman
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  How climate change and wildlife management affect population structure in wild boars.

Authors:  Claudia Bieber; Thomas Ruf; Sebastian G Vetter; Zsófia Puskas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.