Literature DB >> 29742664

Surgical Alteration of Genital Hiatus Size and Anatomic Failure After Vaginal Vault Suspension.

Monique H Vaughan1, Nazema Y Siddiqui, Laura K Newcomb, Alison C Weidner, Amie Kawasaki, Anthony G Visco, Megan S Bradley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare anatomic outcomes after native tissue vaginal vault suspension among women categorized by their preoperative and 6-week postoperative genital hiatus size.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in women who underwent native tissue vaginal vault suspension between 2005 and 2015. We defined a wide genital hiatus as 4 cm or greater and a normal genital hiatus as less than 4 cm. We compared three groups: 1) women with a wide genital hiatus preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively (persistently wide group), 2) women with a wide genital hiatus preoperatively but normal genital hiatus 6 weeks postoperatively (improved group), and 3) women with a normal genital hiatus preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively (stably normal group). Our primary outcome was composite anatomic failure at medium term, defined as either recurrent prolapse beyond the hymen or retreatment for prolapse with surgery or a pessary. Data were analyzed with appropriate bivariate analysis and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Our study population consisted of 260 women, with 39 of 260 (15.0%) in the persistently wide group, 157 of 260 (60.4%) improved, and 64 of 260 (24.6%) stably normal. Composite anatomic failure was significantly more likely in the persistently wide cohort as compared with the other groups (persistently wide 51.3%, improved 16.6%, stably normal 6.3%, overall P<.01, significant for all pairwise comparisons). These results were consistent when examining the anterior, apical, and posterior compartments individually. In a logistic regression analysis, the persistently wide group was associated with a 4.4-fold increased odds of composite failure (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.41, 95% CI 1.99-9.76, P<.01) compared with the improved group and a 15.8-fold increased odds compared with the stably normal group (adjusted OR 15.79, 95% CI 4.66-53.57, P<.01).
CONCLUSION: Women with a preoperative genital hiatus 4 cm or greater that is not surgically normalized after native tissue vaginal vault suspension are at significantly increased odds of anatomic failure in all compartments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29742664     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  14 in total

1.  Levator bowl volume during straining and its relationship to other levator measures.

Authors:  Lahari Nandikanti; Anne G Sammarco; Luyun Chen; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Surgical Repair of the Genital Hiatus: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jacqueline Y Kikuchi; Keila S Muñiz; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension.

Authors:  Gary Sutkin; Halina M Zyczynski; Amaanti Sridhar; J Eric Jelovsek; Charles R Rardin; Donna Mazloomdoost; David D Rahn; John N Nguyen; Uduak U Andy; Isuzu Meyer; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Posterior repair versus no posterior repair for posterior vaginal wall prolapse resolved under simulated apical support at the time of native tissue apical suspension.

Authors:  Sumin Oh; Seohyun Choi; So Yeon Lee; Myung Jae Jeon
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Hiatal failure: effects of pregnancy, delivery, and pelvic floor disorders on level III factors.

Authors:  Wenjin Cheng; Emily English; Whitney Horner; Carolyn W Swenson; Luyun Chen; Fernanda Pipitone; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 1.932

6.  How does office assessment of prolapse compare to what is seen in the operating room?

Authors:  Rui Wang; Elena Tunitsky-Bitton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.932

7.  Mechanisms of hiatus failure in prolapse: a multifaceted evaluation.

Authors:  Emily M English; Luyun Chen; Anne G Sammarco; Giselle E Kolenic; Wenjin Cheng; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.932

8.  Risk Factors for Surgical Failure and Worsening Pelvic Floor Symptoms Within 5 Years After Vaginal Prolapse Repair.

Authors:  Sharon Jakus-Waldman; Linda Brubaker; John Eric Jelovsek; Joseph I Schaffer; David R Ellington; Donna Mazloomdoost; Ryan Whitworth; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 7.623

9.  Preoperative level II/III MRI measures predicting long-term prolapse recurrence after native tissue repair.

Authors:  Payton Schmidt; Luyun Chen; John O DeLancey; Carolyn W Swenson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.932

10.  Immediate Postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Measures and 2-Year Risk of Prolapse Recurrence.

Authors:  Lauren N Siff; Matthew D Barber; Halina M Zyczynski; Charles R Rardin; Sharon Jakus-Waldman; David D Rahn; Ariana L Smith; Donna Mazloomdoost; Amaanti Sridhar; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.