Emily M English1, Luyun Chen1,2, Anne G Sammarco3, Giselle E Kolenic1, Wenjin Cheng1,4, James A Ashton-Miller2, John O DeLancey5,6. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. delancey@umich.edu. 6. L4000 University Hospital South, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. delancey@umich.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We investigated whether factors influencing pelvic floor hiatal closure are inter-related or independent, hypothesizing that (1) hiatus size is moderately correlated with levator defect, pelvic floor muscle strength, and change in hiatus size with contraction and (2) urogenital hiatus (UGH) and levator hiatus (LH) measures are similar in patients with anterior wall (AW) and posterior wall (PW) prolapse. METHODS: This cross-sectional case-control study included subjects with AW prolapse (n = 50), PW prolapse (n = 50), and normal support (n = 50). Hiatus measurements and levator defects were assessed on MRI, and vaginal closure force was measured with an instrumented speculum. Pearson correlation coefficients and simple and multivariable linear regression models were performed. RESULTS: During contraction, LH narrowed 47% more in the PW compared to AW group (p = 0.001). With straining, LH lengthened 34% more in the PW than AW group (p < 0.001). With straining, UGH and LH lengthening was greater by 72% and 44% in those with major compared to no/minor defect (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004). Contraction strength explained, at most, 4% of UGH (r = 0.17) or LH (r = 0.20) shortening during contraction (r = 0.17 and r = 0.20, respectively), indicating that these factors are largely independent. After controlling for prolapse size, resting UGH and levator defect status were associated with straining UGH (p < 0.001, p = 0.004), but muscle strength and resting tone were not. CONCLUSIONS: Hiatus measures are complex and differ according to prolapse occurrence and type. They are, at best, only weakly correlated with pelvic floor muscle strength and movement during contraction.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We investigated whether factors influencing pelvic floor hiatal closure are inter-related or independent, hypothesizing that (1) hiatus size is moderately correlated with levator defect, pelvic floor muscle strength, and change in hiatus size with contraction and (2) urogenital hiatus (UGH) and levator hiatus (LH) measures are similar in patients with anterior wall (AW) and posterior wall (PW) prolapse. METHODS: This cross-sectional case-control study included subjects with AW prolapse (n = 50), PW prolapse (n = 50), and normal support (n = 50). Hiatus measurements and levator defects were assessed on MRI, and vaginal closure force was measured with an instrumented speculum. Pearson correlation coefficients and simple and multivariable linear regression models were performed. RESULTS: During contraction, LH narrowed 47% more in the PW compared to AW group (p = 0.001). With straining, LH lengthened 34% more in the PW than AW group (p < 0.001). With straining, UGH and LH lengthening was greater by 72% and 44% in those with major compared to no/minor defect (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004). Contraction strength explained, at most, 4% of UGH (r = 0.17) or LH (r = 0.20) shortening during contraction (r = 0.17 and r = 0.20, respectively), indicating that these factors are largely independent. After controlling for prolapse size, resting UGH and levator defect status were associated with straining UGH (p < 0.001, p = 0.004), but muscle strength and resting tone were not. CONCLUSIONS: Hiatus measures are complex and differ according to prolapse occurrence and type. They are, at best, only weakly correlated with pelvic floor muscle strength and movement during contraction.
Authors: John O L DeLancey; Daniel M Morgan; Dee E Fenner; Rohna Kearney; Kenneth Guire; Janis M Miller; Hero Hussain; Wolfgang Umek; Yvonne Hsu; James A Ashton-Miller Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Victoria L Handa; Joan L Blomquist; Jennifer Roem; Alvaro Muñoz; Hans Peter Dietz Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2019 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Ingrid Nygaard; Linda Brubaker; Halina M Zyczynski; Geoffrey Cundiff; Holly Richter; Marie Gantz; Paul Fine; Shawn Menefee; Beri Ridgeway; Anthony Visco; Lauren Klein Warren; Min Zhang; Susan Meikle Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Victoria L Handa; Joan L Blomquist; Jennifer Roem; Alvaro Muñoz; Hans Peter Dietz Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2020 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 1.913
Authors: Wenjin Cheng; Emily English; Whitney Horner; Carolyn W Swenson; Luyun Chen; Fernanda Pipitone; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2022-09-21 Impact factor: 1.932