| Literature DB >> 29741738 |
Katrin Watschinger1, Markus A Keller2, Georg Golderer1, Stefan Coassin3, Johannes Zschocke2, Ernst R Werner1.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29741738 PMCID: PMC5946819 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect Dis ISSN: 0022-1899 Impact factor: 7.759
Figure 1.Analysis of cellular alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO) activity and protein expression of wild-type (WT) AGMO versus mutant p.Lys234Arg (KR), mutant p.Arg405* (RX), and double mutant p.[Lys234Arg;Arg405*] (KR/RX) AGMO. A, Protein expression of WT, KR, RX, and KR/RX AGMO was analyzed by Western blot in microsomal fractions after transfection in HEK293T cells. The upper panel shows the AGMO signal, and the lower panel shows the signal of actin, the loading control. Marker protein sizes are indicated as arrows. Representative Western blots are shown. B, Cellular AGMO activity was measured in parallel samples, using our sensitive fluorescent high-performance liquid chromatography AGMO microassay [7]. Results are means ± standard errors of the mean for 3 independent experiments. NS, not significant. **P < .01 and ***P < .001.