Literature DB >> 29741639

Assessment of fecal near-infrared spectroscopy to predict feces chemical composition and apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients in pigs.

Kahsay G Nirea1, Marta Pérez de Nanclares1, Adrijana Skugor1, Nils K Afseth2, Theodorus H E Meuwissen1, Jon Ø Hansen1, Liv T Mydland1, Margareth Øverland1.   

Abstract

Apparent total-tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients could be an alternative measure of feed efficiency (FE) when breeding for robust animals that are fed fiber-rich diets. Apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients requires measuring individual feed intake of a large number of animals which is expensive and complex. Alternatively, ATTD of nutrients and feces chemical composition can be predicted using fecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (FNIRS). The objective of this study was to assess if the feces chemical composition and ATTD of nutrients can be predicted using FNIRS that originate from various pig-experimental datasets. Fecal samples together with detailed information on the feces chemical composition and ATTD of nutrients were obtained from four different pig experiments. Feces near-infrared spectroscopy was analyzed from fecal samples of a complete dataset. The model was calibrated using the FNIRS and reference samples of feces chemical composition and ATTD of nutrients. The robustness and predictability of the model were evaluated by the r2 and the closeness between SE of calibration (SEC) and SE of cross-validation (SECV). Prediction of the feces chemical components and ATTD of nutrients were successful as SEC and SECV were equivalent. Calibration model was developed to estimate the ATTD of nutrients and fecal chemical composition from the FNIRS and worked well for OM (r2 = 0.94; SEC = 48.5; SECV = 56.6), CP (r2 = 0.89; SEC = 18.1; SECV = 18.8), GE (r2 = 0.92; SEC = 1.2; SECV = 1.4), NDF (r2 = 0.94; SEC = 55; SECV = 60.2), OM digestibility (r2 = 0.94; SEC = 5.5; SECV = 6.7), GE digestibility (r2 = 0.88; SEC = 2.3; SECV = 2.6), and fat digestibility (r2 = 0.79; SEC = 6, SECV = 6.8). However, the SE of prediction was slightly higher than what has been reported in another study. The prediction of feces chemical composition for fat (r2 = 0.69; SEC = 11.7, SECV = 12.3), CP digestibility (r2 = 0.63; SEC = 2.3; SECV = 2.7), and NDF digestibility (r2 = 0.64, SEC = 7.7, SECV = 8.8) was moderate. We conclude that the FNIRS accurately predicts the chemical composition of feces and ATTD of nutrients for OM, CP, and GE. The approach of FNIRS is a cost-effective method for measuring digestibility and FE in a large-scale pig-breeding programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29741639      PMCID: PMC6095291          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Heritability of digestibilities and divergent selection for digestion ability in growing chicks fed a wheat diet.

Authors:  S Mignon-Grasteau; N Muley; D Bastianelli; J Gomez; A Péron; N Sellier; N Millet; J Besnard; J M Hallouis; B Carré
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.

Authors:  H Charles J Godfray; John R Beddington; Ian R Crute; Lawrence Haddad; David Lawrence; James F Muir; Jules Pretty; Sherman Robinson; Sandy M Thomas; Camilla Toulmin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Harris A Lewin; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Comparative digestibility of energy and nutrients in fibrous feed ingredients fed to Meishan and Yorkshire pigs.

Authors:  P E Urriola; H H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Predicting feed digestibility from NIRS analysis of pig faeces.

Authors:  D Bastianelli; L Bonnal; Y Jaguelin-Peyraud; J Noblet
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A meta-analysis of the effects of high ambient temperature on growth performance of growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  D Renaudeau; J L Gourdine; N R St-Pierre
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Comparison of total tract digestibility, development of visceral organs and digestive tract of Mong cai and Yorkshire x Landrace piglets fed diets with different fibre sources.

Authors:  N T Len; T T T Hong; B Ogle; J E Lindberg
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.130

8.  Cow-specific diet digestibility predictions based on near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy scans of faecal samples.

Authors:  T Mehtiö; M Rinne; L Nyholm; P Mäntysaari; A Sairanen; E A Mäntysaari; T Pitkänen; M H Lidauer
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 9.  Recent advances in canola meal utilization in swine nutrition.

Authors:  G Mejicanos; N Sanjayan; I H Kim; C M Nyachoti
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2016-02-16
  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review.

Authors:  Jean Noblet; Shu-Biao Wu; Mingan Choct
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-10-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.