Literature DB >> 25532713

Predicting feed digestibility from NIRS analysis of pig faeces.

D Bastianelli1, L Bonnal1, Y Jaguelin-Peyraud2, J Noblet2.   

Abstract

Digestibility is a key parameter in the evaluation of feeds; however, the measurements on animals require heavy experimental trials, which are hardly feasible when large numbers of determinations are required - for example, in genetic studies. This experiment aimed at investigating the possibility to predict digestibility from NIRS spectra measured on faeces. A total of 196 samples were available from a digestibility experiment investigating the effects of age and genetic background of Large White pigs fed the same diet, rich in fibre (NDF=21.4% DM). Digestibility of dry matter (dDM), organic matter (dOM), nitrogen content (dN), energy (dE) and apparent digestible energy content (ADE) were calculated, as well as total N content of faeces (N). The faeces samples were submitted to reflectance NIRS analysis after freeze-drying and grinding. Calibration errors and validation errors were, respectively, 0.08 and 0.13% DM for total N in faeces, 0.97% and 1.08% for dDM, 0.79% and 1.04% for dOM, 1.04% and 1.47% for dN, 0.87% and 1.12% for dE and 167 and 213 kJ/kg DM for ADE. These results indicate that NIRS can account for digestibility differences due to animal factors, with an acceptable accuracy. NIRS appears to be a promising tool for large-scale evaluations of digestibility. It could also be used for the study of digestibility of different feeds, after appropriate calibration based on a wide range of feed types.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NIR spectroscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25532713     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114003097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  2 in total

1.  Assessment of fecal near-infrared spectroscopy to predict feces chemical composition and apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients in pigs.

Authors:  Kahsay G Nirea; Marta Pérez de Nanclares; Adrijana Skugor; Nils K Afseth; Theodorus H E Meuwissen; Jon Ø Hansen; Liv T Mydland; Margareth Øverland
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review.

Authors:  Jean Noblet; Shu-Biao Wu; Mingan Choct
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-10-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.