| Literature DB >> 29740576 |
Celia Garcia-Hernandez1, Cristina Medina-Plaza1, Cristina Garcia-Cabezon2, Yolanda Blanco2, Jose A Fernandez-Escudero3, Enrique Barajas-Tola4, Miguel A Rodriguez-Perez1, Fernando Martin-Pedrosa2, Maria L Rodriguez-Mendez1.
Abstract
The maturity of grapes is usually monitored by means of the sugar concentration. However, the assessment of other parameters such as the phenolic content is also important because the phenolic maturity has an important impact on the organoleptic characteristics of wines. In this work, voltammetric sensors able to detect phenols in red grapes have been developed. They are based on metal oxide nanoparticles (CeO2, NiO, and TiO2,) whose excellent electrocatalytic properties toward phenols allows obtaining sensors with detection limits in the range of 10-8 M and coefficients of variation lower than 7%. An electronic tongue constructed using a combination of the nanoparticle-based sensors is capable to monitor the phenolic maturity of red grapes from véraison to maturity. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) can be successfully used to discriminate samples according to the ripeness. Regression models performed using Partial Least Squares (PLS-1) have established good correlations between voltammetric data obtained with the electrochemical sensors and the Total Polyphenolic Index, the Brix degree and the Total Acidity, with correlation coefficients close to 1 and low number of latent variables. An advantage of this system is that the electronic tongue can be used for the simultaneous assessment of these three parameters which are the main factors used to monitor the maturity of grapes. Thus the electronic tongue based on metal oxide nanoparticles can be a valuable tool to monitor ripeness. These results demonstrate the exciting possible applications of metal oxide nanoparticles in the field of electronic tongues.Entities:
Keywords: electronic tongue; grape; metal oxide nanoparticles; phenolic maturity; ripening
Year: 2018 PMID: 29740576 PMCID: PMC5928143 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1TEM image of the TiO2NPs.
Figure 2Variation of the °Brix (g sugar/ 100 g solution), TA (g/L), Brix/TA and TPI for juices obtained from the variety Tempranillo harvested weekly form véraison to over-ripening.
Figure 3CV of (A) vanillic acid, (B) catechol, (C) caffeic acid, and (D) pyrogaloll at C-CPE, CeO2NP-CPE, NiONP-CPE, and TiO2NP-CPE electrodes. Concentration of 10−4M. Scan rate 100 mV·s−1.
Figure 4CVs and calibration curves of TiO2NP-CPE immersed in increasing concentrations of caffeic acid (from 4.0·10−6 M to 1.5·10−4 M). Scan rate 0.1 V·s-1.
Figure 5Scores plot of the first two principal components of the PCA model calculated from voltammograms registered when electrodes were immersed in 1: Catechol, 2: Pyrogallol, 3: Vanillic acid and 4: Caffeic acid.
Figure 6Voltammetric responses of (A) TiO2NP-CPE and (B) NiONP-CPE electrodes toward Garnacha grapes collected weekly after véraison.
Figure 7(A) 3D Score plot, (B) Loading plot of PCA performed from grape juices from the variety Juan Garcia harvested weekly from véraison to over-ripening (1: First week, 2: Second week, etc. 7: Over-ripening week).
Results of the PLS-1 regression models correlating the chemical parameters and the signals of the sensors.
| Cabernet | °Brix | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.95 | |
| TA (g/L) | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 1.02 | 7 | |
| TPI | 0.86 | 2.13 | 0.83 | 2.42 | ||
| Garnacha | °Brix | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 1.40 | 6 |
| TA (g/L) | 0.85 | 1.24 | 0.73 | 1.72 | 6 | |
| TPI | 0.86 | 2.25 | 0.77 | 3.01 | ||
| Juan Garcia | °Brix | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 5 |
| TA (g/L) | 0.80 | 1.08 | 0.70 | 1.39 | 6 | |
| TPI | 0.84 | 1.54 | 0.79 | 1.84 | ||
| Mencia Regadio | °Brix | 0.97 | 0.22 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 5 |
| TA (g/L) | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 5 | |
| TPI | 0.88 | 1.08 | 0.83 | 1.33 | 5 | |
| Mencia Secano | °Brix | 0.86 | 0.58 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 6 |
| TA (g/L) | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 6 | |
| TPI | 0.86 | 1.57 | 0.82 | 1.79 | ||
| Prieto Picudo | °Brix | 0.87 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 1.25 | 7 |
| TA (g/L) | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.70 | 1.52 | 7 | |
| TPI | 0.83 | 1.33 | 0.81 | 1.43 | ||
| Rufete | °Brix | 0.85 | 0.49 | 0.83 | 0.53 | |
| TA (g/L) | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 1.09 | 5 | |
| TPI | 0.91 | 1.51 | 0.90 | 1.64 | ||
| Tempranillo | °Brix | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 1.01 | 6 |
| TA (g/L) | 0.91 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 0.95 | 6 | |
| TPI | 0.87 | 2.05 | 0.75 | 2.94 |
Models were established for each variety of grape considered separately.
(a) Squared correlation coefficient in calibration; (b) Root mean square error of calibration; (c) Squared correlation coefficient in prediction; (d) Root mean square error of prediction.