Literature DB >> 23312314

Modelling phenolic and technological maturities of grapes by means of the multivariate relation between organoleptic and physicochemical properties.

E Meléndez1, M C Ortiz, L A Sarabia, M Íñiguez, P Puras.   

Abstract

The ripeness of grapes at the harvest time is one of the most important parameters for obtaining high quality red wines. Traditionally the decision of harvesting is to be taken only after analysing sugar concentration, titratable acidity and pH of the grape juice (technological maturity). However, these parameters only provide information about the pulp ripeness and overlook the real degree of skins and seeds maturities (phenolic maturity). Both maturities, technological and phenolic, are not simultaneously reached, on the contrary they tend to separate depending on several factors: grape variety, cultivar, adverse weather conditions, soil, water availability and cultural practices. Besides, this divergence is increasing as a consequence of the climate change (larger quantities of CO(2), less rain, and higher temperatures). 247 samples collected in vineyards representative of the qualified designation of origin Rioja from 2007 to 2011 have been analysed. Samples contain the four grape varieties usual in the elaboration of Rioja wines ('tempranillo', 'garnacha', 'mazuelo' and 'graciano'). The present study is the first systematic investigation on the maturity of grapes that includes the organoleptic evaluation of the degree of grapes maturity (sugars/acidity maturity, aromatic maturity of the pulp, aromatic maturity of the skins and tannins maturity) together with the values of the physicochemical parameters (probable alcohol degree, total acidity, pH, malic acid, K, total index polyphenolics, anthocyans, absorbances at 420, 520 and 620 nm, colour index and tartaric acid) determined over the same samples. A varimax rotation of the latent variables of a PLS model between the physicochemical variables and the mean of four sensory variables allows identifying both maturities. Besides, the position of the samples in the first plane defines the effect that the different factors exert on both phenolic and technological maturities.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23312314     DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  4 in total

1.  A wireless and portable electronic nose to differentiate musts of different ripeness degree and grape varieties.

Authors:  Manuel Aleixandre; Jose Pedro Santos; Isabel Sayago; Juan Mariano Cabellos; Teresa Arroyo; Maria Carmen Horrillo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  A Comparative Study of the Phenolic and Technological Maturities of Red Grapes Grown in Lebanon.

Authors:  Hiba N Rajha; Nada El Darra; Sally El Kantar; Zeina Hobaika; Nicolas Louka; Richard G Maroun
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-26

3.  Assessment of "Sugranineteen" Table Grape Maturation Using Destructive and Auto-Fluorescence Methods.

Authors:  Najwane Hamie; Luigi Tarricone; Vincenzo Verrastro; Giuseppe Natrella; Michele Faccia; Giuseppe Gambacorta
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-02-24

4.  Monitoring the Phenolic Ripening of Red Grapes Using a Multisensor System Based on Metal-Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Celia Garcia-Hernandez; Cristina Medina-Plaza; Cristina Garcia-Cabezon; Yolanda Blanco; Jose A Fernandez-Escudero; Enrique Barajas-Tola; Miguel A Rodriguez-Perez; Fernando Martin-Pedrosa; Maria L Rodriguez-Mendez
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.221

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.