| Literature DB >> 29740530 |
Joon Jai Kim1, Sukhyun Ryu1, Heeyoung Lee2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Investigations into foodborne illness, potentially caused by Kudoa septempunctata, has been ongoing in Korea since 2015. However, epidemiological analysis reporting and positive K septempunctata detection in feces in Korea has been limited. The aim of this study was to provide epidemiologic data analysis of possible food poisoning caused by K septempunctata in Korea.Entities:
Keywords: Korea; diarrhea; foodborne disease; myxozoa
Year: 2018 PMID: 29740530 PMCID: PMC5935147 DOI: 10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.2.05
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Osong Public Health Res Perspect ISSN: 2210-9099
Summary of epidemiologic investigation reports of Kudoa foodborne illness outbreaks in Gyeonggi province between 2015 and 2016.
| Outb No | Date of occurrence | Time interval (hr) | Incubation (hr) mean (min~max) | No of pts | No of persons in risk | Attack rate (%) | Diarrhea (%) | Nausea (%) | Vomiting (%) | Abdominal pain (%) | Febrile sense (%) | Feces exam rate (%) | Attack rate with o.f.(%) | Intake of o.f. among pts(%) | Intake of o.f. among nonpts(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 01/18/15 | 25.5 | 5.9 (5~6.5) | 7 | 8 | 87.5 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 85.7 | - | 85.7 | 100.0 | 87.5 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 2 | 04/19/15 | 17.8 | 3.5 (3~4) | 3 | 4 | 75.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 0 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 |
| 3 | 08/18/15 | - | 4,1 (2~9) | 14 | 18 | 77.8 | 100.0 | 57.1 | 100.0 | 42.9 | 50.0 | 21.4 | 66.7 | 100.0 | - | - |
| 4 | 10/14/15 | 22.2 | 3.5 (2~5) | 4 | 15 | 26.7 | 75.0 | 75.0 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 66.7 | 26.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 5 | 03/20/16 | 21.5 | - | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 6 | 03/26/16 | - | - | 3 | 12 | 25.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 7 | 04/20/16 | 25.5 | - | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 8 | 04/29/16 | 78.0 | 4.5 (3~6) | 3 | 3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | uncalc |
| 9 | 04/29/16 | 17.5 | - | 3 | 3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | uncalc |
| 10 | 06/10/16 | 28.5 | - (5~6) | 4 | 20 | 20.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 25.0 | - | - | - |
| 11 | 06/12/16 | 19.5 | - | 3 | 5 | 60.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 66.7 | 50.0 | - | - | - |
| 12 | 10/08/16 | 53.0 | 3.5 (3~4) | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 50.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | uncalc |
| 13 | 10/18/16 | 35.8 | 6.5 (6~7) | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | uncalc |
| 14 | 11/03/16 | 13.8 | - | 3 | 3 | 100.0 | 66.7 | 100 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | uncalc |
| 15 | 11/08/16 | - | 2.5 (2~3) | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 16 | 11/08/16 | 15.5 | 5.0 (4~6) | 3 | 4 | 75.0 | 66.7 | 0 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 0 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| mean | 28.8/outb | 4.3/outb | 3.9/outb | 7.2/outb | 53.9 (62/115) | 91.5 (54/59) | 57.6 (34/59) | 86.4 (51/59) | 67.8 (40/59) | 34.6 (18/52) | 62.9 (39/62) | 69.2 (27/39) | 64.7 (55/85) | 100 (41/41) | 96.8 (30/31) |
Outb = Outbreak; No = Number; hr = hour; pts = patients; nonpts = non-patients; exam = examination; Date of occurrence = MM/DD/YY
Time interval (hr) = Time interval between Food intake and Epidemiologic survey
Feces exam rate (%) = No of Feces examination/No of patients) × 100
Kudoa(+) rate in Feces (%) = Kudoa(+) detection rate in Feces = (No of Kudoa(+) stool/No of Feces examination) × 100
Attack rate with o.f. (%) = (No of patients/No of raw olive flounder intake) × 100
Intake of o.f. among pts(%) = (No of raw olive flounder intake/No of patients)X 100
Intake of o.f. among nonpts(%) = (No of raw olive flounder intake/No of non-patients)X 100
- = absence of data
uncalc = uncalculable because No of non-patients is 0.
Figure 1The regional distribution of reported outbreaks of food poisoning caused by K septempunctata.
Figure 2The monthly distribution of reported outbreaks of food poisoning caused by K septempunctata.
Figure 3Kudoa (+) detection rate in feces by time interval between food intake and epidermiologic survey.