| Literature DB >> 29740424 |
Rekha Khandia1, Ashok Munjal1, Kuldeep Dhama2, Kumaragurubaran Karthik3, Ruchi Tiwari4, Yashpal Singh Malik5, Raj Kumar Singh6, Wanpen Chaicumpa7.
Abstract
Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is a phenomenon in which preexisting poorly neutralizing antibodies leads to enhanced infection. It is a serious concern with mosquito-borne flaviviruses such as Dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV). In vitro experimental evidences have indicated the preventive, as well as a pathogenicity-enhancing role, of preexisting DENV antibodies in ZIKV infections. ADE has been confirmed in DENV but not ZIKV infections. Principally, the Fc region of the anti-DENV antibody binds with the fragment crystallizable gamma receptor (FcγR), and subsequent C1q interactions and immune effector functions are responsible for the ADE. In contrast to normal DENV infections, with ADE in DENV infections, inhibition of STAT1 phosphorylation and a reduction in IRF-1 gene expression, NOS2 levels, and RIG-1 and MDA-5 expression levels occurs. FcγRIIA is the most permissive FcγR for DENV-ADE, and under hypoxic conditions, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha transcriptionally enhances expression levels of FcγRIIA, which further enhances ADE. To produce therapeutic antibodies with broad reactivity to different DENV serotypes, as well as to ZIKV, bispecific antibodies, Fc region mutants, modified Fc regions, and anti-idiotypic antibodies may be engineered. An in-depth understanding of the immunological and molecular mechanisms of DENV-ADE of ZIKV pathogenicity will be useful for the design of common and safe therapeutics and prophylactics against both viral pathogens. The present review discusses the role of DENV antibodies in modulating DENV/ZIKV pathogenicity/infection and strategies to counter ADE to protect against Zika infection.Entities:
Keywords: Dengue virus; Zika virus; antibody-dependent enhancement; counteracting strategies; engineered antibodies; pathogenesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29740424 PMCID: PMC5925603 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Events of immune response during Dengue virus (DENV) infection and DENV-antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) infection. (A) DENV infection: (a) upon viral entry, pattern recognizing receptor (PRR) signaling activates RIG-1 and MDA-5, (b) IFN-α/β are produced, (c) NO production is upregulated, (d) phosphorylation of STAT1 is reduced, and (e) less viral progeny is produced. (B) DENV-ADE infection: (1) virus-antibody immune complex binds to FcγR and is trafficked inside the cell; (2) PRR signaling is not involved and RIG-1 and MDA-5 are suppressed; (3) IFN-α/β production is inhibited, (4) negative regulation of DAK and Atg5–Atg12; (5) disrupts the RIG-I/MDA-5 (PRRs) signaling cascade; (6) enhanced expression of p65 of NF-κB and degradation of I κB resulted in elevated levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, and TNF-α (pro-inflammatory cytokines); (7) IL-10 secretion enhances SOCS-3 and SOCS-1; (8) in turn attenuates STAT1 phosphorylation; (9) downregulation of IL-12 and IFN-γ; (10) NO production is suppressed; (11) autophagy is increased; and (12) more viral progeny is produced.
Various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) developed against DENV, capable of broader neutralization; inhibition/enhancement of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
| Species from which mAb is derived | Name of mAb | Domain of flavivirus involved in mAb binding | Features of mAbs | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse | 9F12 | Domain III of E glycoprotein | Neutralize all the four DENV and WNV | Rajamanonmani et al. ( |
| E60 | Fusion loop peptide of domain II | Broadly neutralize other flaviviruses | Crill and Chang ( | |
| No binding with FcγR | Tao and Morrison ( | |||
| No activation of C1q | ||||
| 4G2 | Domain II of E glycoprotein | Broadly neutralize other flaviviruses | Charles and Christofferson ( | |
| Cause ADE of Zika in THP-1 cells | ||||
| Enhance ZIKV infection in K562 cell line | ||||
| Female BALB/c mice | 2A10G6 | Highly conserved flavivirus fusion loop peptide (98DRXW101 motif) | Broad cross-reactivity against DENV 1–4, YFV, WNV, JEV, and TBEV | Deng et al. ( |
| Human | 1C19 | Domain II of E glycoprotein | Inhibits fusion loop (FL) antibodies and enhance ADE | Smith et al. ( |
| DV82-LALA mAb | Envelope Dimer Epitope I/II | Partial inhibition of ADE | Stettler et al. ( | |
| 33.3A06 | – | Exhibit minimum ADE and strongly neutralize ZIKV | Priyamvada et al. ( | |
| C8 | Envelope Dimer Epitope 1 | Form and stabilize DENV envelope dimers | Rouvinski et al. ( | |
| A11 | Envelope Dimer Epitope 2 | |||
| C10 | Envelope Dimer Epitope 1 | High therapeutic potential (require only two doses of 10 µg to protect mice from lethal ZIKV infection) | Swanstrom et al. ( | |
| Virus surface E glycoprotein––at pH 6.5 | High therapeutic potential (one of the most potent mAb against ZIKV) | Zhang et al. ( | ||
| E glycoprotein raft structure––at pH 5.0 | Prevent structural rearrangement of the E proteins––a vital step for infection. | |||
| 1.6D and D11C | FL-specific antibodies | Cross-reactive against ZIKV in Rhesus macaque LLC-MK2 kidney epithelial cells | Costin et al. ( | |
| Unable to neutralize ZIKV | Paul et al. ( | |||
Various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) developed against ZIKV, capable of broader neutralization; inhibition/enhancement of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
| Species from which mAb developed | Name of mAb | Domain of flavivirus involved in mAb binding | Special notes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALB/c mice | D11 | NS1 | ZIKV specific and negligible cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses | |
| Mice | ZV-67 | lateral ridge | Neutralize African, Asian, and American strainsPassively transferred antibody protects mice from infection | Zhao et al. ( |
| ZV-54 | ||||
| ZV-48 | DIII (C–C′ loop) | |||
| ZV-64 | ||||
| ZV-2 | DIII (ABDE sheet) | Poor inhibition of ZIKV infection | ||
| ZV-13 | DI-II | Support ADE of DENV | ||
| Human | P1F12 | A unique unidentified conformational epitope | Specific for ZIKV and did not cross-react with DENV | Magnani et al. ( |
| Z23 and Z3L1 | To tertiary epitopes in envelope protein | No cross-reactivity with DENV1–DENV4 | Wang et al. ( | |
| Potent ZIKV-specific neutralization | ||||
| ZikV-117 | DII dimer-dimer interface | Neutralize African, Asian, and American strains | Stettler et al.; Zhao et al. ( | |
| Prophylactic use | ||||
| ZK2B10 and ZK7C3 | E glycoprotein | IC50 of 0.04 and 0.11 µg/mL, respectively, for each mAb and potently neutralizing mAb | Yu et al. ( | |
| No detectable cross-reactivity with DENV1 and DENV2 | ||||
| ZKA190 | DIII | Highly potent in ZIKV neutralization | Stettler et al. ( | |
| No ADE in K562 cells (>1-µg/mL concentration) | ||||
| ZKA230 | Neutralizing-non-E binding | Potentially neutralize ZIKV | ||
| Cause ADE at higher concentrations in K562 cells | ||||
| ZKA64 | DIII | Potentially neutralize ZIKV (IC50 values of 93 ng/mL) | ||
| No ADE in ZIKV infections in K562 cells if more than 1-µg/mL concentration is used | ||||
| ZKA64-LALA | DIII | Complete blocking of ADE effect | ||
| ZKA3 | Envelope Dimer Epitope I/II | Partial neutralization of ZIKV infectivity | ||
| ZKA78 | LALA version of antibody inhibit ADE | |||
| ZKA185 | Envelope Dimer Epitope region (Neutralizing Non-Binder) | Does not react with recombinant envelope protein (E-protein) or EDIII | ||
| ZIKV-116 | E, DIII, and E-FLM. | Neutralize diverse ZIKV strains | Sapparapu et al. ( | |
| ZIKV-19 | E and E-FLM | Weakly neutralize ZIKV infection | ||
| ZK2B10 and ZK7C3 | E glycoprotein | Strongly neutralize ZIKV, DENV1, and DENV2 | Yu et al. ( | |
| Therapeutic potential due to 100% protection of mice from lethal ZIKV challenge | ||||
| ZV67 | A strand, the BC loop, the DE loop, and the FG loop | Only ZIKV neutralizing | ||
| ZK8-4 | DI/DII | Poorly neutralizing, derived from a plasmablast B cell on day 4 | ||
| Non-protective in mice | ||||
Figure 2Strategies to counter Dengue virus (DENV)-antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)/Zika virus (ZIKV). (1) Mutations in the Fc region: removal of native Fc N-linked glycosylation site and the “LALA” double mutation (Leu234Ala together with Leu235Ala) in the Fc region of antibody prevents binding to FcγR. (2) Bispecific antibodies: bispecific antibody (DVD-1A1D-2A10) with anti-DENV monoclonal antibody (mAb) 1A1D-2 (1A1D) specific to the E-DIII, check the virus attachment to the cell, and mAb 2A10, will bind to the E-DII and further prevents the endosomal fusion of the virus. This neutralizing antibody neutralizes all the DENV serotypes without inducing ADE. Similar strategies can be employed for the ZIKV. (3) Swapping of Fc region: the Fc region of D23-1G7C2-IgG1 can be changed to generate antibodies with each of IgG subclasses (IgG2–4). The swapping of the Fc region might result in reduced ADE activity in FcγRI and FcγRII-bearing THP-1 cells in the case of IgG2 or IgG4 subclasses. (4) Anti-idiotypic antibodies: anti-idiotypic antibodies (prM-AIDs) targeted to prM mAb largely reduces the symptoms of ADE.