Toni Darville1, Hannah L Albritton2, Wujuan Zhong3, Li Dong3, Catherine M O'Connell1, Taylor B Poston1, Alison J Quayle2, Nilu Goonetilleke4, Harold C Wiesenfeld5, Sharon L Hillier5, Xiaojing Zheng1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 4. Departments of Microbiology & Immunology and Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 5. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, The Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
PROBLEM: Chlamydia infections in women can ascend to the upper genital tract, and repeated infections are common, placing women at risk for sequelae. The protective role of anti-chlamydia antibodies to surface exposed antigens in ascending and incident infection is unclear. METHOD OF STUDY: A whole-bacterial ELISA was used to quantify chlamydia-specific IgG and IgA in serum and cervical secretions of 151 high-risk women followed longitudinally. Correlations were determined between antibody and cervical burden, and causal mediation analysis investigated the effect of antibody on ascension. We examined the relationship of antibody to incident infection using the marginal Cox model. RESULTS: Serum and cervical anti-chlamydia IgG and cervical IgA levels correlated inversely with cervical burden. While lower burden was associated with reduced ascension, causal mediation analysis revealed that the indirect effects of antibody mediated through reductions in bacterial burden were insufficient to prevent ascension. Analysis of women uninfected at enrollment revealed that serum and cervical anti-chlamydia IgG were associated with increased risk of incident infection; hazard ratio increased 3.6-fold (95% CI, 1.3-10.3), and 22.6-fold (95% CI, 3.1-165.2) with each unit of serum and cervical IgG, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although anti-chlamydia IgG and IgA correlated with reduced cervical chlamydia burden, they failed to prevent ascension and increased levels of anti-chlamydia IgG were associated with increased risk for incident infection.
PROBLEM: Chlamydia infections in women can ascend to the upper genital tract, and repeated infections are common, placing women at risk for sequelae. The protective role of anti-chlamydia antibodies to surface exposed antigens in ascending and incident infection is unclear. METHOD OF STUDY: A whole-bacterial ELISA was used to quantify chlamydia-specific IgG and IgA in serum and cervical secretions of 151 high-risk women followed longitudinally. Correlations were determined between antibody and cervical burden, and causal mediation analysis investigated the effect of antibody on ascension. We examined the relationship of antibody to incident infection using the marginal Cox model. RESULTS: Serum and cervical anti-chlamydia IgG and cervical IgA levels correlated inversely with cervical burden. While lower burden was associated with reduced ascension, causal mediation analysis revealed that the indirect effects of antibody mediated through reductions in bacterial burden were insufficient to prevent ascension. Analysis of women uninfected at enrollment revealed that serum and cervical anti-chlamydia IgG were associated with increased risk of incident infection; hazard ratio increased 3.6-fold (95% CI, 1.3-10.3), and 22.6-fold (95% CI, 3.1-165.2) with each unit of serum and cervical IgG, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although anti-chlamydia IgG and IgA correlated with reduced cervical chlamydia burden, they failed to prevent ascension and increased levels of anti-chlamydia IgG were associated with increased risk for incident infection.
Authors: P A Kozlowski; R M Lynch; R R Patterson; S Cu-Uvin; T P Flanigan; M R Neutra Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2000-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Nicole M Budrys; Siqi Gong; Allison K Rodgers; Jie Wang; Christopher Louden; Rochelle Shain; Robert S Schenken; Guangming Zhong Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Wolfgang Wehrl; Volker Brinkmann; Peter R Jungblut; Thomas F Meyer; Agnes J Szczepek Journal: Mol Microbiol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.501
Authors: Chuwen Liu; Katrin Hufnagel; Catherine M O'Connell; Nilu Goonetilleke; Neha Mokashi; Tim Waterboer; Tammy S Tollison; Xinxia Peng; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Sharon L Hillier; Xiaojing Zheng; Toni Darville Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 7.759
Authors: Wujuan Zhong; Li Dong; Taylor B Poston; Toni Darville; Cassandra N Spracklen; Di Wu; Karen L Mohlke; Yun Li; Quefeng Li; Xiaojing Zheng Journal: Front Genet Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Amanda L Collar; Alexandria C Linville; Susan B Core; Cosette M Wheeler; William M Geisler; David S Peabody; Bryce Chackerian; Kathryn M Frietze Journal: mSphere Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 4.389
Authors: Stephanie R Lundy; Shakyra Richardson; Anne Ramsey; Debra Ellerson; Yan Fengxia; Sunny Onyeabor; Ward Kirlin; Winston Thompson; Carolyn M Black; Jason P DeBruyne; Alec J Davidson; Lilly C Immergluck; Uriel Blas-Machado; Francis O Eko; Joseph U Igietseme; Qing He; Yusuf O Omosun Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Janice Leahgrace Simons; Jessica S McKenzie; Nicole C Wright; Shainela A Sheikh; Akila Subramaniam; Alan T N Tita; Jodie Dionne-Odom Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 3.868