| Literature DB >> 29740249 |
Shengbo Ge1, Lishu Wang1, Jiaojiao Ma1, Shuaicheng Jiang1, Wanxi Peng2,1.
Abstract
Bayberry has been largely planted in China, and the waste of fresh flesh of bayberry was still abandoned. Therefore, the extractives of fresh flesh of bayberry were studied to further utilize the bio-resources. Through the Foss method, the result shown that ketone, aldehyde, ester and acid compounds were accounted for 1.30, 92.61, 0.54 and 6.09% of the extractives which were extracted from fresh flesh of bayberry by methanol solvents. Aldehyde, bicyclic sesquiterpenes, acid, ester and alcohol compounds accounted for 53.74, 9.95, 28.49, 6.79 and 1.05% of the extractives which were extracted from fresh flesh of bayberry by ethanol solvents. Ketone, aldehyde, carbohydrate, acid and ester compounds accounted for 4.77, 77.95, 12.06, 4.77 and 0.44% of the extractives which were extracted from fresh flesh of bayberry by ethyl acetate solvents. The extractives of fresh flesh of bayberry were rich in rare drug and biomedical activities and the ethanol is more better to extract the fresh flesh of bayberry.Entities:
Keywords: Bayberry; Chemical composition; Extractives; GC–MS
Year: 2017 PMID: 29740249 PMCID: PMC5936875 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.09.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Total ion chromatograms of the fresh flesh of Myrica rubra which were extracted by methanol, ethanol and ethyl acetate, respectively.
GC–MS analysis of Y1 sample.
| No. | Retention time (min) | Peak area (%) | Component |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.503 | 1.30 | 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- |
| 2 | 4.308 | 92.61 | 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural |
| 3 | 19.488 | 3.34 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- |
| 4 | 19.59 | 1.07 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- |
| 5 | 19.704 | 0.68 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- |
| 6 | 22.048 | 0.54 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)- |
| 7 | 23.48 | 0.46 | Oleic Acid |
GC–MS analysis of Y2 sample.
| No. | Retention time (min) | Peak area (%) | Component |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.097 | 53.74 | 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural |
| 2 | 6.571 | 9.95 | Caryophyllene |
| 3 | 16.506 | 8.16 | |
| 4 | 16.57 | 1.62 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl 8-methylnonyl ester |
| 5 | 18.947 | 0.97 | 8,11-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester |
| 6 | 19.061 | 0.94 | 10-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester |
| 7 | 19.65 | 10.08 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- |
| 8 | 19.752 | 10.25 | cis-Vaccenic acid |
| 9 | 20.141 | 3.26 | Linoleic acid ethyl ester |
| 10 | 23.48 | 1.05 | 1-Heptatriacotanol |
GC–MS analysis of Y3 sample.
| No. | Retention time (min) | Peak area (%) | Component |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.46 | 4.77 | 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- |
| 2 | 4.081 | 77.95 | 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural |
| 3 | 6.636 | 12.06 | Melezitose |
| 4 | 16.446 | 1.83 | n-Hexadecanoic acid |
| 5 | 19.59 | 1.75 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- |
| 6 | 19.682 | 1.19 | cis-Vaccenic acid |
| 7 | 20.131 | 0.44 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)- |