Literature DB >> 29739888

Reply to Goffinet: In consonance, old ideas die hard.

Daniel L Bowling1, Dale Purves2, Kamraan Z Gill3.   

Abstract

Year:  2018        PMID: 29739888      PMCID: PMC5984545          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805570115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  A biological rationale for musical consonance.

Authors:  Daniel L Bowling; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Indifference to dissonance in native Amazonians reveals cultural variation in music perception.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Alan F Schultz; Eduardo A Undurraga; Ricardo A Godoy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Little evidence for the vocal similarity hypothesis.

Authors:  Jack Goffinet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The basis of musical consonance as revealed by congenital amusia.

Authors:  Marion Cousineau; Josh H McDermott; Isabelle Peretz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Musical intervals in speech.

Authors:  Deborah Ross; Jonathan Choi; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Vocal similarity predicts the relative attraction of musical chords.

Authors:  Daniel L Bowling; Dale Purves; Kamraan Z Gill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.