Literature DB >> 29739778

Predicting declines in perceived relationship continuity using practice deprivation scores: a longitudinal study in primary care.

Louis S Levene1, Richard Baker1, Nicola Walker1, Christopher Williams1, Andrew Wilson1, John Bankart1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased relationship continuity in primary care is associated with better health outcomes, greater patient satisfaction, and fewer hospital admissions. Greater socioeconomic deprivation is associated with lower levels of continuity, as well as poorer health outcomes. AIM: To investigate whether deprivation scores predicted variations in the decline over time of patient-perceived relationship continuity of care, after adjustment for practice organisational and population factors. DESIGN AND
SETTING: An observational study in 6243 primary care practices with more than one GP, in England, using a longitudinal multilevel linear model, 2012-2017 inclusive.
METHOD: Patient-perceived relationship continuity was calculated using two questions from the GP Patient Survey. The effect of deprivation on the linear slope of continuity over time was modelled, adjusting for nine confounding variables (practice population and organisational factors). Clustering of measurements within general practices was adjusted for by using a random intercepts and random slopes model. Descriptive statistics and univariable analyses were also undertaken.
RESULTS: Relationship continuity declined by 27.5% between 2012 and 2017, and at all deprivation levels. Deprivation scores from 2012 did not predict variations in the decline of relationship continuity at practice level, after accounting for the effects of organisational and population confounding variables, which themselves did not predict, or weakly predicted with very small effect sizes, the decline of continuity. Cross-sectionally, continuity and deprivation were negatively correlated within each year.
CONCLUSION: The decline in relationship continuity of care has been marked and widespread. Measures to maximise continuity will need to be feasible for individual practices with diverse population and organisational characteristics. © British Journal of General Practice 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  continuity of patient care; primary health care; socioeconomic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29739778      PMCID: PMC6002014          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X696209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  22 in total

1.  Continuity of care and recognition of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Richelle J Koopman; Arch G Mainous; Richard Baker; James M Gill; Gregory E Gilbert
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-06-09

2.  The association of attributes of primary care with the delivery of clinical preventive services.

Authors:  S A Flocke; K C Stange; S J Zyzanski
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The effect of continuity of care on emergency department use.

Authors:  J M Gill; A G Mainous; M Nsereko
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  2000-04

4.  'I saw the panic rise in her eyes, and evidence-based medicine went out of the door.' An exploratory qualitative study of the barriers to secondary prevention in the management of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  William S M Summerskill; Catherine Pope
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 5.  A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and health care professionals about medicines: the consequences for concordance.

Authors:  Fiona A Stevenson; Kate Cox; Nicky Britten; Yenal Dundar
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men. A randomized trial.

Authors:  J H Wasson; A E Sauvigne; R P Mogielnicki; W G Frey; C H Sox; C Gaudette; A Rockwell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-11-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Interpersonal continuity of care: a cross-sectional survey of primary care patients' preferences and their experiences.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Mary Boulton; Kate Windridge; Carolyn Tarrant; John Bankart; George K Freeman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Continuity of care: influence of general practitioners' knowledge about their patients on use of resources in consultations.

Authors:  P Hjortdahl; C F Borchgrevink
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-09

9.  'Two sides of the coin'--the value of personal continuity to GPs: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Matthew Ridd; Alison Shaw; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics.

Authors:  John Campbell; Patten Smith; Sonja Nissen; Peter Bower; Marc Elliott; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  17 in total

1.  A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data.

Authors:  Kate Sidaway-Lee; Denis Pereira Gray; Philip Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Part-time relationships.

Authors:  Saul Miller
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Dynamism has a downside.

Authors:  Saul Miller
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Measuring continuity of care in general practice: a comparison of two methods using routinely collected data.

Authors:  Sally A Hull; Crystal Williams; Peter Schofield; Kambiz Boomla; Mark Ashworth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.302

5.  Relational continuity and patients' perception of GP trust and respect: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Mairead Murphy; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review.

Authors:  Richard Baker; George K Freeman; Jeannie L Haggerty; M John Bankart; Keith H Nockels
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  General practice in the years ahead: relationships will matter more than ever.

Authors:  Roger Jones
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  General practitioner strategies for managing patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Raechel A Damarell; Deidre D Morgan; Jennifer J Tieman
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Setting goals with patients living with multimorbidity: qualitative analysis of general practice consultations.

Authors:  Charlotte Salter; Alice Shiner; Elizabeth Lenaghan; Jamie Murdoch; John A Ford; Sandra Winterburn; Nick Steel
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Challenges and strategies for general practitioners diagnosing serious infections in older adults: a UK qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Sara McKelvie; Abigail Moore; Caroline Croxson; Daniel S Lasserson; Gail N Hayward
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.