Literature DB >> 10776361

The effect of continuity of care on emergency department use.

J M Gill1, A G Mainous, M Nsereko.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether continuity of care with an individual health care provider is associated with the number of hospital emergency department (ED) visits in a statewide Medicaid population.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study based on a 100% sample of Delaware Medicaid claims for 1 year (July 1, 1993, to June 30, 1994). Continuity with a single provider during the year was computed for each participant.
SETTING: The state of Delaware. PARTICIPANTS: Continuously enrolled Medicaid clients aged 0 to 64 years who had made at least 3 physician office visits during the study year (N = 11,474). INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likelihood of making a single ED visit or multiple ED visits during the study year.
RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, continuity is associated with a significantly lower likelihood of making a single ED visit (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.95), and is even more strongly associated with a lower likelihood of making multiple ED visits (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that high provider continuity is associated with lower ED use for the Medicaid population. This suggests that strategies to improve continuity of care may result in lower ED use and possibly reduced health care costs. Such strategies may be more acceptable than current managed care policies that attempt to control costs by denying access to emergency care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10776361     DOI: 10.1001/archfami.9.4.333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Fam Med        ISSN: 1063-3987


  110 in total

1.  Does continuity of care matter? Yes: consistent contact with a physician improves outcomes.

Authors:  D A Christakis
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-07

2.  Emergency department use among the homeless and marginally housed: results from a community-based study.

Authors:  Margot B Kushel; Sharon Perry; David Bangsberg; Richard Clark; Andrew R Moss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Continuity of care: process or outcome?

Authors:  Dimitri A Christakis
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Continuity of care and quality of care - inseparable twin.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Azri
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2008-07

5.  Delaware's 1999-2017 Leading Causes of Death Information Illustrates Its Obesity and Obesity-Related Life-Limiting Disease Burdens.

Authors:  Malcolm J D'Souza; Riza C Li; Derald E Wentzien
Journal:  Res Health Sci       Date:  2019-11-12

6.  Disparities in primary care for vulnerable children: the influence of multiple risk factors.

Authors:  Gregory D Stevens; Michael Seid; Ritesh Mistry; Neal Halfon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Patients' perceptions of access to primary care: Analysis of the QUALICOPC Patient Experiences Survey.

Authors:  Kamila Premji; Bridget L Ryan; William E Hogg; Walter P Wodchis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Relationship Between Continuity of Ambulatory Care and Risk of Emergency Department Episodes Among Older Adults.

Authors:  David J Nyweide; Julie P W Bynum
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Prescriber Continuity and Disease Control of Older Adults.

Authors:  Matthew L Maciejewski; Bradley G Hammill; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Laura Ding; Corrine I Voils; Lesley H Curtis; Virginia Wang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Primary care physician visit continuity: a comparison of patient-reported and administratively derived measures.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Richard E Marshall; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.