Jeremy S Somerson1, John P Petersen2, Moni B Neradilek3, Amy M Cizik2, Albert O Gee2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas. 2. Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 3. The Mountain-Whisper-Light, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited regarding the complications and outcomes after medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction. The published data regarding this procedure are composed predominantly of small Level-III and IV retrospective studies for which meta-analysis is not generally useful. Meta-regression is an alternative technique to identify variables across multiple publications that have an effect on published outcomes and complication rates. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of published literature for outcomes after UCL reconstruction. A random effects meta-regression model was constructed to identify the association of study characteristics with outcome proportions. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of influential studies on the results. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (median sample size, 26 patients; range, 10 to 743 patients) were included in the systematic review and meta-regression. These studies included a total of 1,177 patients with a reported Conway outcome rating (a measure of a patient's return to play). The majority of patients (mean, 83.2%) achieved an excellent Conway rating. Studies involving the docking technique were more likely to have a higher percentage of patients with an excellent outcome (14% risk difference compared with the figure-of-8 technique, p = 0.002) and lower reported rates of ulnar neurapraxia (Spearman correlation = -0.83). A lower reported rate of ulnar neurapraxia was strongly associated with the likelihood of an excellent (p = 0.01) or good or excellent (p = 0.001) Conway outcome rating. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial heterogeneity among study outcomes, studies that involved a docking technique and that had lower reported rates of ulnar neurapraxia were associated with greater percentages of excellent or good-to-excellent reported Conway outcome ratings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited regarding the complications and outcomes after medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction. The published data regarding this procedure are composed predominantly of small Level-III and IV retrospective studies for which meta-analysis is not generally useful. Meta-regression is an alternative technique to identify variables across multiple publications that have an effect on published outcomes and complication rates. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of published literature for outcomes after UCL reconstruction. A random effects meta-regression model was constructed to identify the association of study characteristics with outcome proportions. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of influential studies on the results. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (median sample size, 26 patients; range, 10 to 743 patients) were included in the systematic review and meta-regression. These studies included a total of 1,177 patients with a reported Conway outcome rating (a measure of a patient's return to play). The majority of patients (mean, 83.2%) achieved an excellent Conway rating. Studies involving the docking technique were more likely to have a higher percentage of patients with an excellent outcome (14% risk difference compared with the figure-of-8 technique, p = 0.002) and lower reported rates of ulnar neurapraxia (Spearman correlation = -0.83). A lower reported rate of ulnar neurapraxia was strongly associated with the likelihood of an excellent (p = 0.01) or good or excellent (p = 0.001) Conway outcome rating. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial heterogeneity among study outcomes, studies that involved a docking technique and that had lower reported rates of ulnar neurapraxia were associated with greater percentages of excellent or good-to-excellent reported Conway outcome ratings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: Steven P Daniels; Douglas N Mintz; Yoshimi Endo; Joshua S Dines; Darryl B Sneag Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Cort D Lawton; Joseph D Lamplot; Joshua I Wright-Chisem; Evan W James; Christopher L Camp; Joshua S Dines Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2020-06
Authors: Robert A Jack; Somnath Rao; Taylor D'Amore; Donald P Willier; Robert Gallivan; Steven B Cohen; Christopher C Dodson; Michael G Ciccotti Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-08-18
Authors: Devin P Leland; Ayoosh Pareek; Erik Therrien; Ryan R Wilbur; Michael J Stuart; Aaron J Krych; Bruce A Levy; Christopher L Camp Journal: Sports Med Arthrosc Rev Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Richard M Danilkowicz; Robert S O'Connell; James Satalich; Jeffrey A O'Donnell; Etienne Flamant; Alexander R Vap Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-04-15
Authors: Jonathan S Yu; James B Carr; Jacob Thomas; Julianna Kostas; Zhaorui Wang; Tyler Khilnani; Katie Liu; Joshua S Dines Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-03-10