Literature DB >> 29738097

Detection of major loci associated with the variation of 18 important agronomic traits between Solanum pimpinellifolium and cultivated tomatoes.

Shuaibin Zhang1,2, Hong Yu3, Ketao Wang1,4, Zheng Zheng1,5, Lei Liu1, Meng Xu1,2, Zhicheng Jiao1,2, Ren Li1,2, Xiyan Liu1, Jiayang Li3, Xia Cui1,2.   

Abstract

Wild species can be used to improve various agronomic traits in cultivars; however, a limited understanding of the genetic basis underlying the morphological differences between wild and cultivated species hinders the integration of beneficial traits from wild species. In the present study, we generated and sequenced recombinant inbred lines (RILs, 201 F10 lines) derived from a cross between Solanum pimpinellifolium and Solanum lycopersicum tomatoes. Based on a high-resolution recombination bin map to uncover major loci determining the phenotypic variance between wild and cultivated tomatoes, 104 significantly associated loci were identified for 18 agronomic traits. On average, these loci explained ~39% of the phenotypic variance of the RILs. We further generated near-isogenic lines (NILs) for four identified loci, and the lines exhibited significant differences for the associated traits. We found that two loci could improve the flower number and inflorescence architecture in the cultivar following introgression of the wild-species alleles. These findings allowed us to construct a trait-locus network to help explain the correlations among different traits based on the pleiotropic or linked loci. Our results provide insights into the morphological changes between wild and cultivated tomatoes, and will help to identify key genes governing important agronomic traits for the molecular selection of elite tomato varieties.
© 2018 The Authors The Plant Journal © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Solanum lycopersicumzzm321990; RILs; agronomic traits; cultivated species; wild species

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29738097     DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  7 in total

1.  Tomato genomic prediction for good performance under high-temperature and identification of loci involved in thermotolerance response.

Authors:  Elisa Cappetta; Giuseppe Andolfo; Anna Guadagno; Antonio Di Matteo; Amalia Barone; Luigi Frusciante; Maria Raffaella Ercolano
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.793

2.  Genome-wide association study reveals the genetic architecture of 27 agronomic traits in tomato.

Authors:  Jie Ye; Xin Wang; Wenqian Wang; Huiyang Yu; Guo Ai; Changxing Li; Pengya Sun; Xianyu Wang; Hanxia Li; Bo Ouyang; Junhong Zhang; Yuyang Zhang; Heyou Han; James J Giovannoni; Zhangjun Fei; Zhibiao Ye
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.005

3.  Targeting a gene regulatory element enhances rice grain yield by decoupling panicle number and size.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Song; Xiangbing Meng; Hongyan Guo; Qiao Cheng; Yanhui Jing; Mingjiang Chen; Guifu Liu; Bing Wang; Yonghong Wang; Jiayang Li; Hong Yu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 68.164

4.  Genetic dissection of an allotetraploid interspecific CSSLs guides interspecific genetics and breeding in cotton.

Authors:  Ximei Li; Zhiwei Wang; Chunyuan You; Xinhui Nie; Jie Sun; Xianlong Zhang; Dawei Zhang; Zhongxu Lin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  SISTER OF TM3 activates FRUITFULL1 to regulate inflorescence branching in tomato.

Authors:  Xiaotian Wang; Zhiqiang Liu; Shuai Sun; Jianxin Wu; Ren Li; Haijing Wang; Xia Cui
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.793

6.  High-Throughput Genotyping of Resilient Tomato Landraces to Detect Candidate Genes Involved in the Response to High Temperatures.

Authors:  Fabrizio Olivieri; Roberta Calafiore; Silvana Francesca; Carlo Schettini; Pasquale Chiaiese; Maria Manuela Rigano; Amalia Barone
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery.

Authors:  Xing Wu; Christopher Heffelfinger; Hongyu Zhao; Stephen L Dellaporta
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.