Christie D Warren1, Ken Fowler2, David Speed3, Anna Walsh1. 1. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada. 2. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada. kenfowler@mun.ca. 3. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Individuals with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and bipolar II disorder (BD-II) are at higher risk for experiencing high levels of psychological distress and low levels of social support. OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives of this study were to examine perceived social support and psychological distress among Canadian adults with self-reported BD-I or BD-II as diagnosed by a health professional and explore the relationship between types of social support and psychological distress within this sample. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional, national datafile, 563 Canadian male and female adults (20-64 years) who reported being diagnosed with BD-I or BD-II were investigated using the Social Provisions Scale (SPS), and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). RESULTS: It was observed that while the BD-I or BD-II sample had significantly lower SPS scores and significantly higher K10 scores than the overall Canadian sample, age and support in the form of reassurance of worth and social integration were associated with decreased psychological distress. Further, a diagnosis of BD-I and BD-II was found to moderate the effect of social support on psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations, which include self-reported diagnosis of BD-I and BD-II and potential exclusion of those who are not diagnosed but have BD-I or BD-II, these findings suggest that reassurance of worth and social integration may act as protective factors for psychological distress among individuals with BD-I or BD-II.
INTRODUCTION: Individuals with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and bipolar II disorder (BD-II) are at higher risk for experiencing high levels of psychological distress and low levels of social support. OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives of this study were to examine perceived social support and psychological distress among Canadian adults with self-reported BD-I or BD-II as diagnosed by a health professional and explore the relationship between types of social support and psychological distress within this sample. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional, national datafile, 563 Canadian male and female adults (20-64 years) who reported being diagnosed with BD-I or BD-II were investigated using the Social Provisions Scale (SPS), and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). RESULTS: It was observed that while the BD-I or BD-II sample had significantly lower SPS scores and significantly higher K10 scores than the overall Canadian sample, age and support in the form of reassurance of worth and social integration were associated with decreased psychological distress. Further, a diagnosis of BD-I and BD-II was found to moderate the effect of social support on psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations, which include self-reported diagnosis of BD-I and BD-II and potential exclusion of those who are not diagnosed but have BD-I or BD-II, these findings suggest that reassurance of worth and social integration may act as protective factors for psychological distress among individuals with BD-I or BD-II.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bipolar disorder; Psychological distress; Social support
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Peggy R Barker; Lisa J Colpe; Joan F Epstein; Joseph C Gfroerer; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Ronald W Manderscheid; Ellen E Walters; Alan M Zaslavsky Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-02
Authors: Allison M R Lee; Daphne Simeon; Lisa J Cohen; Janine Samuel; Annie Steele; Igor I Galynker Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Keltie C Mcdonald; Andrew G M Bulloch; Anne Duffy; Lauren Bresee; Jeanne V A Williams; Dina H Lavorato; Scott B Patten Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: June Gruber; Jenifer L Culver; Sheri L Johnson; Jennifer Y Nam; Kristine L Keller; Terence A Ketter Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.744