Literature DB >> 29737199

Steep Infundibulopelvic Angle as a New Risk Factor for Flexible Ureteroscope Damage and Complicated Postoperative Course.

Tomasz Ozimek1, Jens Cordes1, Judith R Wiessmeyer1, Michael H Schneider1, Marie C Hupe1, Nils Gilbert1, Axel S Merseburger1, Mario W Kramer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The increasing number of flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) procedures, the fragility of devices, and their growing repair costs represent a substantial burden for urological departments worldwide. No risk factors of flexible ureteroscope damage have been identified so far. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) on device damage and on other intraoperative and postoperative factors such as length of hospital stay, surgical complications, stone-free rate (SFR), operation, and fluoroscopy time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective monocentric study, IPA was measured based on intraoperative retrograde pyelography images taken during fURS. All procedures were conducted with modern reusable flexible ureteroscopes: Karl Storz Flex-X2 or Olympus URF-V. Statistical analysis was performed in RStudio (version 1.0.136) with the unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Pearson correlation coefficient (Pearson's r) was measured whenever applicable.
RESULTS: In total, 381 fURS performed between September 2013 and March 2017 were analyzed: 260 (68.24%) for kidney stone operation and 121 (31.76%) for diagnostic purposes; of these, 38 (9.97%) devices were postoperatively deemed defective. IPA values were significantly steeper in cases with flexible ureteroscope damage compared to cases without damage (median 42.5 degrees vs 56.0, p < 0.001). Steeper IPA was significantly associated with the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo ≥2 complications (median 51.0 degrees vs 55.0, p = 0.005) as well as prolonged hospital stay (median 51.0 degrees vs 55.0, p = 0.014). No influence on SFR was observed (p > 0.05). IPA did not correlate with operation or fluoroscopy time.
CONCLUSIONS: Steep IPA can be considered the first risk factor predicting both flexible ureteroscope damage and an unfavorable postoperative course. A better understanding of damage mechanisms is the key for the proper indications to use costly single-use devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; flexible ureterorenoscopy; flexible ureteroscope damage; infundibulopelvic angle

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29737199     DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

1.  Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Balushi; Nathalie Martin; Hélène Loubon; Michael Baboudjian; Floriane Michel; Pierre-Clément Sichez; Thomas Martin; Eugénie Di-Crocco; Sarah Gaillet; Veronique Delaporte; Akram Akiki; Alice Faure; Gilles Karsenty; Eric Lechevallier; Romain Boissier
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Handling and protecting your flexible ureteroscope: how to maximise scope usage.

Authors:  Khaled Hosny; Jennifer Clark; Shalom J Srirangam
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

3.  LithoVue™ for renal stone therapy - a perfect fit for high volume academic centers; a retrospective evaluation of 108 cases.

Authors:  Maximilian Pallauf; Sabina Sevcenco; Christopher Steiner; Martin Drerup; Michael Mitterberger; Daniela Colleselli; Lukas Lusuardi; Thomas Kunit
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements.

Authors:  Alexandre Danilovic; Bruno Aragão Rocha; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Olivier Traxer; Carlos Batagello; Fabio Carvalho Vicentini; Fábio César Miranda Torricelli; Miguel Srougi; William Carlos Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 5.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Takaaki Inoue; Shinsuke Okada; Shuzo Hamamoto; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

Review 6.  Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.

Authors:  Eduardo Mazzucchi; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Fernanda Christina Gabrigna Berto; John Denstedt; Alexandre Danilovic; Fabio Carvalho Vicentini; Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli; Carlos Alfredo Battagello; Miguel Srougi; William Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 7.  Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review.

Authors:  Bogdan Geavlete; Cristian Mareș; Răzvan Mulțescu; Dragoș Georgescu; Petrișor Geavlete
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-08

8.  Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Sulaiman Sadaf Karim; Luke Hanna; Robert Geraghty; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.