Literature DB >> 29736868

A pragmatic comparative study of palliative care clinician's reports of the degree of shadowing visible on plain abdominal radiographs.

Katherine Clark1,2, L Lam3, N J Talley4, G Watts4,5, J L Phillips3, N J Byfieldt5, D C Currow3.   

Abstract

The assessment of constipation symptoms is based on history and physical examination. However, the experience is highly subjective perhaps explaining why palliative medicine doctors continue to use plain abdominal radiographs as part of routine assessment of constipation. Previous studies have demonstrated poor agreement between clinicians with this work in palliative care, limited further by disparity of clinicians' experience and training. The aim of this work was to explore whether there was less variation in the assessments of faecal shadowing made by more experienced clinicians compared to their less experienced colleagues. This pragmatic study was conducted across six palliative care services in Sydney (NSW, Australia). Doctors of varying clinical experience were asked to independently report their opinions of the amount of shadowing seen on 10 plain abdominal radiographs all taken from cancer patients who self-identified themselves as constipated. There were 46 doctors of varying clinical experience who participated including qualified specialists, doctors in specialist training and lastly, doctors in their second- and third post-graduate years. Poor agreement was seen between the faecal shadowing scores allocated by doctors of similar experience and training (Fleiss's kappa (FK): RMO 0.05; registrar 0.06; specialist 0.11). Further, when the levels of agreement between groups were considered, no statistically significant differences were observed. Although the doctors did not agree on the appearance of the film, the majority felt they were able to extrapolate patients' experiences from the radiograph's appearance. As it remains challenging in palliative care to objectively assess and diagnose constipation by history and imaging, uniform and objective assessment and diagnostic criteria are required. It is likely that any agreed criteria will include a combination of imaging and history. The results suggest the use of radiographs alone to diagnose and assess constipation in palliative care represents low value care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal radiographs; Advanced cancer; Constipation; Palliative care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29736868     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4238-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  30 in total

1.  Reducing Unnecessary Imaging for Patients With Constipation in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Catherine Craun Ferguson; Matthew P Gray; Melissa Diaz; Kevin P Boyd
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on constipation.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Spencer D Dorn; Anthony Lembo; Amanda Pressman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Constipation: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A prospective study to investigate contributory factors that lead to constipation in palliative care patients.

Authors:  Katherine Clark; Lawrence Lam; David C Currow; Meera Agar
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Symptom Burden and Performance Status among Community-Dwelling Patients with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; Ryan D Nipp; Janet Bull; Charles S Stinson; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Evaluation of a method of assessing faecal loading on plain abdominal radiographs in children.

Authors:  S C Leech; K McHugh; P B Sullivan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1999-04

Review 7.  Evaluation of gastrointestinal transit in clinical practice: position paper of the American and European Neurogastroenterology and Motility Societies.

Authors:  S S C Rao; M Camilleri; W L Hasler; A H Maurer; H P Parkman; R Saad; M S Scott; M Simren; E Soffer; L Szarka
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Blinded comparison of faecal loading on plain radiography versus radio-opaque marker transit studies in the assessment of constipation.

Authors:  S Cowlam; R Vinayagam; U Khan; S Marsden; I Minty; P Moncur; I Bain; Y J Yiannakou
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Insights into normal and disordered bowel habits from bowel diaries.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Barbara M Seide; Alan R Zinsmeister; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  An appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for constipation: a right attitude towards to guidelines.

Authors:  Hongliang Tian; Chao Ding; Jianfeng Gong; Xiaolong Ge; Lynne V McFarland; Lili Gu; Qiyi Chen; Chunlian Ma; Weiming Zhu; Jieshou Li; Ning Li
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  2 in total

1.  Response to Davies A, Leach C, Caponero R, Dickman A, Fuchs D, Paice J, Emmanuel A (2020) MASCC recommendations on the management of constipation in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 28:23.

Authors:  Katherine Clark; David C Currow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Obstipation in pet pigs: 24 cases.

Authors:  Kallie J Hobbs; SallyAnne L DeNotta; Aitor Gallastegui; George L Elane; Luis A Rivero; Pamela Adkins; Diego E Gomez
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.008

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.