BACKGROUND: While symptom questionnaires provide a snapshot of bowel habits, they may not reflect day-to-day variations or the relationship between bowel symptoms and stool form. AIM: To assess bowel habits by daily diaries in women with and without functional bowel disorders. METHOD: From a community-based survey among Olmsted County, MN, women, 278 randomly selected subjects were interviewed by a gastroenterologist, who completed a bowel symptom questionnaire. Subjects also maintained bowel diaries for 2 wk. RESULTS: Among 278 subjects, questionnaires revealed diarrhea (26%), constipation (21%), or neither (53%). Asymptomatic subjects reported bowel symptoms (e.g., urgency) infrequently (i.e., <25% of the time) and generally for hard or loose stools. Urgency for soft, formed stools (i.e., Bristol form = 4) was more prevalent in subjects with diarrhea (31%) and constipation (27%) than in normals (16%). Stool form, straining to begin (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-10.2) and end (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.6-15.2) defecation increased the odds for constipation. Straining to end defecation (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.2-12.0), increased stool frequency (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.02-3.7), incomplete evacuation (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.04-4.6), and rectal urgency (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-6.6) increased the odds for diarrhea. In contrast, variations in stool frequency and form were not useful for discriminating between health and disease. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel symptoms occur in association with, but are only partly explained by, stool form disturbances. These observations support a role for other pathophysiological mechanisms in functional bowel disorders.
BACKGROUND: While symptom questionnaires provide a snapshot of bowel habits, they may not reflect day-to-day variations or the relationship between bowel symptoms and stool form. AIM: To assess bowel habits by daily diaries in women with and without functional bowel disorders. METHOD: From a community-based survey among Olmsted County, MN, women, 278 randomly selected subjects were interviewed by a gastroenterologist, who completed a bowel symptom questionnaire. Subjects also maintained bowel diaries for 2 wk. RESULTS: Among 278 subjects, questionnaires revealed diarrhea (26%), constipation (21%), or neither (53%). Asymptomatic subjects reported bowel symptoms (e.g., urgency) infrequently (i.e., <25% of the time) and generally for hard or loose stools. Urgency for soft, formed stools (i.e., Bristol form = 4) was more prevalent in subjects with diarrhea (31%) and constipation (27%) than in normals (16%). Stool form, straining to begin (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-10.2) and end (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.6-15.2) defecation increased the odds for constipation. Straining to end defecation (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.2-12.0), increased stool frequency (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.02-3.7), incomplete evacuation (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.04-4.6), and rectal urgency (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-6.6) increased the odds for diarrhea. In contrast, variations in stool frequency and form were not useful for discriminating between health and disease. CONCLUSIONS:Bowel symptoms occur in association with, but are only partly explained by, stool form disturbances. These observations support a role for other pathophysiological mechanisms in functional bowel disorders.
Authors: Adil E Bharucha; Alan R Zinsmeister; G Richard Locke; Barbara M Seide; Kimberly McKeon; Cathy D Schleck; L Joseph Melton Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Douglas A Drossman; Carolyn B Morris; Yuming Hu; Brenda B Toner; Nicholas Diamant; Jane Leserman; Michael Shetzline; Christine Dalton; Shrikant I Bangdiwala Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Kirsten Tillisch; Jennifer S Labus; Bruce D Naliboff; Roger Bolus; Michael Shetzline; Emeran A Mayer; Lin Chang Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: A E Bharucha; J G Fletcher; C M Harper; D Hough; J R Daube; C Stevens; B Seide; S J Riederer; A R Zinsmeister Journal: Gut Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: F Mearin; X Badía; A Balboa; J Benavent; A M Caballero; E Domínguez-Muñoz; V Garrigues; J M Piqué; M Roset; M Cucala; M Figueras Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Katherine Clark; L Lam; N J Talley; G Watts; J L Phillips; N J Byfieldt; D C Currow Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Abdul H Sultan; Ash Monga; Joseph Lee; Anton Emmanuel; Christine Norton; Giulio Santoro; Tracy Hull; Bary Berghmans; Stuart Brody; Bernard T Haylen Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Subhankar Chakraborty; Kelly Feuerhak; Anjani Muthyala; William S Harmsen; Kent R Bailey; Adil E Bharucha Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-08-18 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Shiva K Ratuapli; Adil E Bharucha; Jessica Noelting; Doris M Harvey; Alan R Zinsmeister Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 22.682