Literature DB >> 29736497

Antibacterial Effect and Substantivity of Toothpaste Slurries In Vivo.

Nicole Birgit Arweiler, Friederike Grelle, Anton Sculean, Christian Heumann, Thorsten M Auschill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This double-blind, clinical, cross-over study evaluated the antibacterial effect of three toothpastes (ASF, HTP and STP) and a chlorhexidine mouthrinse (0.2%; CHX; positive control) after a single application on established biofilm over a period of 24 h (substantivity).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four subjects refrained from all oral hygiene measures for a period of 72 h. After 48 h, a baseline biofilm sample was taken and vitality of the biofilm flora was examined (baseline, VF0). Then they rinsed for 1 min with one of the randomly allocated, freshly prepared toothpaste slurries (ASF, HTP, STP) or CHX. Further biofilm samples were taken every second hour up to 14 h as well as 24 h after rinsing, and biofilm vitality was assessed (VF2-24). After a wash-out period of 4 days, a new test cycle was started.
RESULTS: All subjects (18 female, 6 male) finished the four test cycles. At VF2, all products showed a statistically significant reduction in vitality compared to VF0 (p<0.05). CHX and ASF revealed the most pronounced effect (49% and 40% reduction), while the other toothpastes (HTP: 24%, STP: 11%) reached lower but still statistically significant effects. At each further time point CHX and ASF showed the lowest biofilm vitality. ASF demonstrated a significant antibacterial effect on dental biofilm over a 24-h period compared to baseline and superiority over both other toothpastes at time points VF2-VF14.
CONCLUSION: ASF toothpaste showed a significant antibacterial action on biofilm and a high substantivity which was maintained up to 24 hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29736497     DOI: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a40310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Health Prev Dent        ISSN: 1602-1622            Impact factor:   1.256


  4 in total

1.  Microbial approaches for the assessment of toothpaste efficacy against oral species: A method comparison.

Authors:  Pune N Paqué; Lamprini Karygianni; Julien Kneubuehler; Lorenzo Fiscalini; Daniel B Wiedemeier; Marcel Müller; Thomas Attin; Thomas Thurnheer
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.904

2.  The role of toothbrush in the transmission of corona- and influenza viruses - results of an in vitro study.

Authors:  Gerhard Schmalz; Laura Feindt; Franziska Tanneberger; Rainer Haak; Ahmed Abd El Wahed; Uwe Truyen; Dirk Ziebolz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  The Current Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activities of Synthetic/Herbal/Biomaterials in Dental Application.

Authors:  Ali Moghaddam; Reza Ranjbar; Mohsen Yazdanian; Elahe Tahmasebi; Mostafa Alam; Kamyar Abbasi; Zahra Sadat Hosseini; Hamid Tebyaniyan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Comparative Evaluation of 3 Commercial Mouthwash Formulations on Clinical Parameters of Chronic Gingivitis.

Authors:  Shahabe Saquib Abullais; Sabiha Ilyas Patel; Elyas Ali Asiri; Adel Ali Ahmed Jathmi; Afnan Hassan Alkhayri; Yosra Mohammed Mousa; Atheer Abdulhade Ganem; Khurshid A Mattoo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-09-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.