| Literature DB >> 29736095 |
Hatef Ghasemi Hamidabadi1,2, Majid Malekzadeh Shafaroudi1,2, Morteza Seifi3, Maryam Nazm Bojnordi2, Masume Behruzi2, Mazaher Gholipourmalekabadi4,5, Ali Malekzadeh Shafaroudi6, Nourollah Rezaei1,2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The repair of critical-sized defects (CSDs) are one of the most challenging orthopedic problems and the attempts for development of an ideal scaffold for treatment of large bone defect are ongoing. AIM: The aim of this study was the effectiveness of hydroxyapatite-gelatin seeded with bone marrow stromal cells construct for healing of critical-sized bone defect in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: Bone marrow stromal cell; Scaffold; Tissue engineering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29736095 PMCID: PMC5911173 DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.88-93
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Arch ISSN: 0350-199X
Semi-quantitative scale for estimation of bone formation
| Score | Extent of bone in Transplant |
|---|---|
| 0 | No bone evident |
| 1 | Minimal bone evident (one trabecular per section) |
| 2 | Low bone formation, occupying only small portion of section |
| 3 | Moderate bone formation, occupying a substantial portion but less than one-half of the section |
| 4 | Abundant bone formation, occupying greater than one-half of the section |
Figure 1.Phase contrast microscopy image of mesenchymal stem cells cultured in the fourth passage. The existence of fibroblast-like cells and spindle shaped cells were observed. (400×)
Figure 2.Cytotoxicity effects of hydroxyapatite-gelatin scaffolds on bone marrow stromal cells (P<0.05).
Figure 3.Histologic sections 4 weeks after transplantation in rat skull. (A), (B) and (C) are images of the control group , the Nano-hydroxyapatite -gelatin composite transplant group and the transplanted Nano-hydroxyapatite-gelatin with mesenchymal stem cell group, respectively (stained by hematoxylin and eosin) (400×). (A’), (B’) and (C) are images of the control group, the Nano-hydroxyapatite-gelatin composite transplant group and the transplanted Nano-hydroxyapatite-gelatin with mesenchymal stem cell group, respectively (stained by the Trichrome) (400×). Bone formation at the site of injury was shown with white arrows. No trace of bone tissue formation was observed in the control group. Newly bone formation scoring showed the positive effectiveness of BMSCs-seeded HA/GEL Nano composite in critical-sized bone defect healing during both short-term (1 week) and long-term (4 weeks) post-implantation. * and ** indicate significant difference with control and HA/GEL groups, respectively (p<0.05).
Figure 4.The results of counting lymphocyte and polymorphonuclear cells at the transplantation union in the control, the Nano-hydroxyapatite -gelatin composite transplant and the transplanted Nano-hydroxyapatite-gelatin with mesenchymal stem cell groups. (A): A week after transplantation (B): Four weeks after transplantation (* P <0.05 & ** P <0.01)
Figure 5.All the cells counted in the transplantation site (Cellularity) in the control, the Nano-hydroxyapatite -gelatin composite transplant and the transplanted Nano-hydroxyapatite-gelatin with mesenchymal stem cell groups (p<0.05).