Literature DB >> 29735750

Systematic review of fit note use for workers in the UK.

Sarah Dorrington1,2, Emmert Roberts1,2, Arnstein Mykletun3,4,5,6,7, Stephani Hatch1, Ira Madan8, Matthew Hotopf1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The fit note, introduced in England, Wales and Scotland in 2010, was designed to change radically the sickness certification process from advising individuals on their inability to work to advising them on what they could do if work could be adapted. Our review aimed to evaluate the following: (1) Is the 'maybe fit' for work option being selected for patients? (2) Are work solutions being recommended? (3) Has the fit note increased return to work? (4) Has the fit note reduced the length of sickness absence? We considered the way in which outcomes vary according to patient demographics including type of health problem.
METHODS: Studies were identified by a systematic search. We included all studies of any design conducted in the UK with working age adults, aged 16 or over, from 1 April 2010 to 1 Nov 2017. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS: Thirteen papers representing seven studies met inclusion criteria. In the largest study, 'maybe fit' for work was recommended in 6.5% of fit notes delivered by general practitioners (GP; n=361 801) between April 2016 and March 2017. 'Maybe fit' recommendations were made in 8.5%-10% of fit notes received by primary care patients in employment, and in 10%-32% of patients seen by GPs trained in the Diploma in Occupational Medicine. 'Maybe fit' was recommended more for women, those with higher socioeconomic status, and for physical, as opposed to psychiatric disorders. The majority of fit notes with the 'maybe fit' option selected included work solutions. There was inconclusive evidence to suggest that the introduction of the fit note has reduced sickness absence among patients in employment.
CONCLUSIONS: Fit notes represent a major shift in public policy. Our review suggests that they have been incompletely researched and not implemented as intended. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disability; fitness for work; mental health; primary care; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29735750     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  7 in total

1.  Attitudes and practices of ophthalmology doctors in London (UK) on the importance of discussing work as a clinical outcome with patients during consultations: A cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Katherine Kuncewicz; Isabelle Schiff; Jaroslaw Liszka; Sheni Akinfie; Nadia McLurcan; Ira Madan; Shairana Naleem; Vaughan Parsons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  The Capacity Note: a communication facilitator in the sick leave process of patients with common mental disorders - a qualitative study of user perceptions.

Authors:  Paula Nordling; Annika Jakobsson; Gunnel Hensing
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Return to work after carpal tunnel release surgery: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Lisa Newington; Charlotte Brooks; David Warwick; Jo Adams; Karen Walker-Bone
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Health condition at first fit note and number of fit notes: a longitudinal study of primary care records in south London.

Authors:  Sarah Dorrington; Ewan Carr; C Polling; Sharon Stevelink; Mark Ashworth; Emmert Roberts; Matthew Broadbent; Stephani Hatch; Ira Madan; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Mental Illness and Work-Related Limitations in Healthcare Workers: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Sara Gostoli; Laura Nicolucci; Carlotta Malaguti; Chiara Patierno; Danilo Carrozzino; Cristian Balducci; Sara Zaniboni; Vittorio Lodi; Carmine Petio; Chiara Rafanelli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Pre-return to work consultation and therapeutic part-time work: Cross-sectional study on level of knowledge and use by general practitioners in France.

Authors:  Cyril Bègue; Lucille Desmidt; William Bellanger; Christine Tessier-Cazeneuve; Audrey Petit; Anne-Laure Couturier
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  What clinical challenges are associated with diagnosing and managing work-related mental health conditions? A qualitative study in general practice.

Authors:  Samantha Paubrey Chakraborty; Jacinta Dermentzis; Bianca Brijnath; Eli Ivey; Danielle Mazza
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.