Literature DB >> 29735663

Linked genetic variation and not genome structure causes widespread differential expression associated with chromosomal inversions.

Iskander Said1,2, Ashley Byrne3, Victoria Serrano2, Charis Cardeno4, Christopher Vollmers1,2, Russell Corbett-Detig5,2.   

Abstract

Chromosomal inversions are widely thought to be favored by natural selection because they suppress recombination between alleles that have higher fitness on the same genetic background or in similar environments. Nonetheless, few selected alleles have been characterized at the molecular level. Gene expression profiling provides a powerful way to identify functionally important variation associated with inversions and suggests candidate phenotypes. However, altered genome structure itself might also impact gene expression by influencing expression profiles of the genes proximal to inversion breakpoint regions or by modifying expression patterns genome-wide due to rearranging large regulatory domains. In natural inversions, genetic differentiation and genome structure are inextricably linked. Here, we characterize differential expression patterns associated with two chromosomal inversions found in natural Drosophila melanogaster populations. To isolate the impacts of genome structure, we engineered synthetic chromosomal inversions on controlled genetic backgrounds with breakpoints that closely match each natural inversion. We find that synthetic inversions have negligible effects on gene expression. Nonetheless, natural inversions have broad-reaching regulatory impacts in cis and trans Furthermore, we find that differentially expressed genes associated with both natural inversions are enriched for loci associated with immune response to bacterial pathogens. Our results support the idea that inversions in D. melanogaster experience natural selection to maintain associations between functionally related alleles to produce complex phenotypic outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromosomal inversions; differential expression; genome structure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29735663      PMCID: PMC6003460          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1721275115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

1.  Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data.

Authors:  R R Hudson; M Slatkin; W P Maddison
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Dynamics of disease resistance polymorphism at the Rpm1 locus of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  E A Stahl; G Dwyer; R Mauricio; M Kreitman; J Bergelson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Genetic basis of transcriptome diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Wen Huang; Mary Anna Carbone; Michael M Magwire; Jason A Peiffer; Richard F Lyman; Eric A Stone; Robert R H Anholt; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The FLP recombinase of yeast catalyzes site-specific recombination in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  K G Golic; S Lindquist
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Sequence-based detection and breakpoint assembly of polymorphic inversions.

Authors:  Russell B Corbett-Detig; Charis Cardeno; Charles H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  How and why chromosome inversions evolve.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Stable Chromosome Condensation Revealed by Chromosome Conformation Capture.

Authors:  Kyle P Eagen; Tom A Hartl; Roger D Kornberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Wolfgang Huber; Simon Anders
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Population Genomics of sub-saharan Drosophila melanogaster: African diversity and non-African admixture.

Authors:  John E Pool; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Ryuichi P Sugino; Kristian A Stevens; Charis M Cardeno; Marc W Crepeau; Pablo Duchen; J J Emerson; Perot Saelao; David J Begun; Charles H Langley
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  10 in total

1.  Fine-Mapping Complex Inversion Breakpoints and Investigating Somatic Pairing in the Anopheles gambiae Species Complex Using Proximity-Ligation Sequencing.

Authors:  Russell B Corbett-Detig; Iskander Said; Maria Calzetta; Max Genetti; Jakob McBroome; Nicholas W Maurer; Vincenzo Petrarca; Alessandra Della Torre; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dynisty Wright; Stephen W Schaeffer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Supergene potential of a selfish centromere.

Authors:  Findley Finseth; Keely Brown; Andrew Demaree; Lila Fishman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  The Cyclically Seasonal Drosophila subobscura Inversion O7 Originated From Fragile Genomic Sites and Relocated Immunity and Metabolic Genes.

Authors:  Charikleia Karageorgiou; Rosa Tarrío; Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Fine-Scale Position Effects Shape the Distribution of Inversion Breakpoints in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jakob McBroome; David Liang; Russell Corbett-Detig
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Genome structure variation analyses of peach reveal population dynamics and a 1.67 Mb causal inversion for fruit shape.

Authors:  Jiantao Guan; Yaoguang Xu; Yang Yu; Jun Fu; Fei Ren; Jiying Guo; Jianbo Zhao; Quan Jiang; Jianhua Wei; Hua Xie
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  A large chromosomal inversion shapes gene expression in seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida).

Authors:  Emma L Berdan; Claire Mérot; Henrik Pavia; Kerstin Johannesson; Maren Wellenreuther; Roger K Butlin
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2021-10-07

8.  Gene Expression Modification by an Autosomal Inversion Associated With Three Male Mating Morphs.

Authors:  Jasmine L Loveland; David B Lank; Clemens Küpper
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Perspectives of CRISPR/Cas-mediated cis-engineering in horticulture: unlocking the neglected potential for crop improvement.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Manoj Sapkota; Esther van der Knaap
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 6.793

10.  Parallel and population-specific gene regulatory evolution in cold-adapted fly populations.

Authors:  Yuheng Huang; Justin B Lack; Grant T Hoppel; John E Pool
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.