Courtney O'Donnell1, Nicole Michael1, X Pan2, John Emans3, Sumeet Garg1, Mark Erickson4. 1. Children's Hospital Colorado, 13123 E 16th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. 2. University of Colorado Anschutz, 13001 E 17th PI, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. 3. Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 4. Children's Hospital Colorado, 13123 E 16th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Electronic address: Mark.erickson@childrenscolorado.org.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Retrospective comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes between anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in surgical treatment of Lenke 5 curves. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASF and PSF are used for treatment of Lenke 5 curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Currently, no consensus exists for optimal surgical treatment of Lenke 5 curves. METHODS: Patients with Lenke 5 curves treated with either ASF or PSF were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter database and then retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, perioperative measures, radiographic data, and SRS-22R scores were collected and compared for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were included in the study; 51 underwent PSF and 98 underwent ASF. There was no difference in demographics between groups. The PSF group was fused one level longer than the ASF group (5.9 levels PSF, 4.6 levels ASF, p < .0001). The PSF group had shorter operative times (223 minutes PSF, 297 minutes ASF; p < .0001) and a higher proportion of patients who received a postoperative blood transfusion (45% vs. 5%, p < .0001). PSF patients had longer hospital stays (6.1d PSF vs. 5d ASF, p = .031). The ASF group had larger preoperative major curve (48.2° ASF, 44.2° PSF; p < .01). Coronal balance, thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angle, shoulder height, trunk shift, and overall sagittal balance were not different between groups at two-year follow-up. Curve correction at two-year follow-up was similar between groups (66% ASF vs. 62% PSF). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or complication rates between groups. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in radiographic or clinical outcomes in patients treated with ASF or PSF for Lenke 5 curves. ASF may save a fusion level, but has longer operative time than PSF. Ultimately, the risks and benefits of each approach merit consideration by surgeon and patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Retrospective comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes between anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in surgical treatment of Lenke 5 curves. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASF and PSF are used for treatment of Lenke 5 curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Currently, no consensus exists for optimal surgical treatment of Lenke 5 curves. METHODS:Patients with Lenke 5 curves treated with either ASF or PSF were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter database and then retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, perioperative measures, radiographic data, and SRS-22R scores were collected and compared for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were included in the study; 51 underwent PSF and 98 underwent ASF. There was no difference in demographics between groups. The PSF group was fused one level longer than the ASF group (5.9 levels PSF, 4.6 levels ASF, p < .0001). The PSF group had shorter operative times (223 minutes PSF, 297 minutes ASF; p < .0001) and a higher proportion of patients who received a postoperative blood transfusion (45% vs. 5%, p < .0001). PSFpatients had longer hospital stays (6.1d PSF vs. 5d ASF, p = .031). The ASF group had larger preoperative major curve (48.2° ASF, 44.2° PSF; p < .01). Coronal balance, thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angle, shoulder height, trunk shift, and overall sagittal balance were not different between groups at two-year follow-up. Curve correction at two-year follow-up was similar between groups (66% ASF vs. 62% PSF). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or complication rates between groups. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in radiographic or clinical outcomes in patients treated with ASF or PSF for Lenke 5 curves. ASF may save a fusion level, but has longer operative time than PSF. Ultimately, the risks and benefits of each approach merit consideration by surgeon and patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.