| Literature DB >> 29734765 |
Keyu Ren1, Wenlin Zhang2, Shurui Cao3, Guomin Wang4, Zhiqin Zhou5,6.
Abstract
Carbon-based Fe₃O₄ nanocomposites (C/Fe₃O₄ NCs) were synthesized by a simple one-step hydrothermal method using waste pomelo peels as the carbon precursors. The characterization results showed that they had good structures and physicochemical properties. The prepared C/Fe₃O₄ NCs could be applied as excellent and recyclable adsorbents for magnetic solid phase extraction (MSPE) of 11 triazole fungicides in fruit samples. In the MSPE procedure, several parameters including the amount of adsorbents, extraction time, the type and volume of desorption solvent, and desorption time were optimized in detail. Under the optimized conditions, the good linearity (R² > 0.9916), the limits of detection (LOD), and quantification (LOQ) were obtained in the range of 1⁻100, 0.12⁻0.55, and 0.39⁻1.85 μg/kg for 11 pesticides, respectively. Lastly, the proposed MSPE method was successfully applied to analyze triazole fungicides in real apple, pear, orange, peach, and banana samples with recoveries in the range of 82.1% to 109.9% and relative standard deviations (RSDs) below 8.4%. Therefore, the C/Fe₃O₄ NCs based MSPE method has a great potential for isolating and pre-concentrating trace levels of triazole fungicides in fruits.Entities:
Keywords: carbon based Fe3O4 nanocomposites; magnetic solid phase extraction; pomelo peels; triazole fungicides
Year: 2018 PMID: 29734765 PMCID: PMC5977316 DOI: 10.3390/nano8050302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Illustration of the procedure for synthesis of C/Fe3O4 NCs and MSPE steps for triazole fungicides analysis in fruits.
Figure 2(A) X-ray diffraction pattern, (B) Raman spectrum, (C) SEM image, (D) TEM image, (E) VSM magnetization curve of C/Fe3O4 NCs, and (F) FT-IR spectra of C/Fe3O4 NCs and PPs.
Figure 3Effects of (A) ratio of activation, (B) extraction time, (C) amount of adsorbent, (D) pH of extraction solvent, (E) salt concentration, (F) type of desorption solvent, (G) volume of desorption solvent, (H) and desorption time on the MSPE performance. (1. Triadimefon, 2. Triadimenol, 3. Triflumizole, 4. Hexaconazole, 5. Flusilazole, 6. Diniconazole, 7. Epoxiconazole, 8. Propiconazole, 9. Tebuconazole, 10. Bitertanol, 11. Difenoconazole).
The retention times, target ions, and analytical parameters of the MSPE-GC-MS method for 11 triazole fungicide compounds.
| Compounds | Rt (min) | Quantifier and Qualifier ( | Regression Equations |
| LOD (μg/kg) | LOQ (μg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triadimefon | 15.395 | 0.9916 | 0.15 | 0.50 | ||
| Triadimenol | 16.586 | 0.9990 | 0.26 | 0.88 | ||
| Triflumizole | 16.785 | 0.9997 | 0.32 | 1.08 | ||
| Hexaconazole | 17.467 | 0.9951 | 0.26 | 0.86 | ||
| Flusilazole | 18.005 | 0.9970 | 0.12 | 0.39 | ||
| Diniconazole | 18.600 | 0.9947 | 0.14 | 0.46 | ||
| Epoxiconazole | 19.395 | 0.9930 | 0.55 | 1.85 | ||
| Propiconazole | 19.403 | 0.9999 | 0.13 | 0.45 | ||
| Tebuconazole | 19.866 | 0.9984 | 0.16 | 0.54 | ||
| Bitertanol | 22.406 | 0.9951 | 0.18 | 0.58 | ||
| Difenoconazole | 25.309 | 0.9982 | 0.15 | 0.51 |
y: peak area; x: mass concentration, μg/L. Linear range: 1 μg/kg to 100 μg/kg. The bold represents quantitation ions of 11 triazole fungicides.
The precision of MSPE-GC-MS method for 11 triazole fungicides.
| Compounds | Spiked Level (μg/kg) | Intra-Day ( | Inter-Day ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | ||
| Triadimefon | 10 | 87.6 | 5.4 | 85.6 | 6.7 |
| 20 | 91.2 | 3.6 | 89.6 | 4.4 | |
| 50 | 96.8 | 2.3 | 93.3 | 4.6 | |
| Triadimenol | 10 | 90.6 | 4.2 | 87.7 | 5.9 |
| 20 | 92.5 | 4.1 | 88.6 | 4.7 | |
| 50 | 104.3 | 2.6 | 97.1 | 3.5 | |
| Triflumizole | 10 | 109.9 | 5.2 | 102.8 | 6.5 |
| 20 | 104.2 | 3.2 | 97.2 | 6.1 | |
| 50 | 97.8 | 2.1 | 98.1 | 3.8 | |
| Hexaconazole | 10 | 98.2 | 4.9 | 95.1 | 7.6 |
| 20 | 99.2 | 3.2 | 95.9 | 4.9 | |
| 50 | 103.5 | 2.6 | 97.7 | 3.8 | |
| Flusilazole | 10 | 108.7 | 6.6 | 104.0 | 8.4 |
| 20 | 98.5 | 4.2 | 95.3 | 6.4 | |
| 50 | 99.2 | 3.2 | 96.6 | 4.5 | |
| Diniconazole | 10 | 103.1 | 4.7 | 96.4 | 7.9 |
| 20 | 101.0 | 3.8 | 98.5 | 4.6 | |
| 50 | 102.4 | 2.8 | 97.7 | 3.7 | |
| Epoxiconazole | 10 | 103.8 | 5.4 | 98.4 | 5.7 |
| 20 | 99.1 | 3.9 | 96.9 | 4.8 | |
| 50 | 101.5 | 3.2 | 99.4 | 3.6 | |
| Propiconazole | 10 | 85.7 | 4.6 | 83.5 | 6.0 |
| 20 | 92.5 | 4.3 | 86.1 | 5.6 | |
| 50 | 95.4 | 3.6 | 89.4 | 4.2 | |
| Tebuconazole | 10 | 83.9 | 6.1 | 82.1 | 6.9 |
| 20 | 90.0 | 5.2 | 86.1 | 7.0 | |
| 50 | 96.3 | 3.4 | 95.0 | 4.2 | |
| Bitertanol | 10 | 107.8 | 6.2 | 98.1 | 7.3 |
| 20 | 96.2 | 5.1 | 94.3 | 5.4 | |
| 50 | 102.1 | 2.5 | 100.7 | 4.6 | |
| Difenoconazole | 10 | 89.0 | 5.0 | 84.6 | 5.3 |
| 20 | 92.6 | 4.2 | 90.3 | 4.8 | |
| 50 | 93.9 | 2.9 | 92.3 | 4.2 | |
Figure 4Effect of recycle times on the recoveries of 11 triazole fungicides.
11 triazole fungicide residues in real samples (μg/kg).
| Compounds | Apple | Pear | Orange | Banana | Peach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triadimefon | ND | 0.41 ± 0.03 | ND | ND | ND |
| Triadimenol | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Triflumizole | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Hexaconazole | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.07 | ND | ND | 0.49 ± 0.03 |
| Flusilazole | 0.19 ± 0.05 | ND | ND | ND | 0.33 ± 0.01 |
| Diniconazole | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Epoxiconazole | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Propiconazole | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Tebuconazole | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Bitertanol | 0.20 ± 0.04 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Difenoconazole | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
ND indicates that the content of the sample is less than LOD. Data presented are in means ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Comparison of proposed methods with other methods for determining triazole fungicides.
| Adsorbent | Analyte Number | Sample | Determination | LOD (μg/kg) | RSD (%) | Extraction Time (min) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNTs | 3 | Water | GC-MS | 0.02–0.03 | <12 | >30 | [ |
| G-Fe3O4 | 7 | Vegetables | GC-MS | 0.01–0.10 | <10.6 | 20 | [ |
| IL-Fe3O4@MWCNTs | 6 | Water | GC-MS | 0.05–0.22 | <10.5 | 8 | [ |
| GCB,C18 | 5 | Medicines | UPLC-MS/MS | 0.50–1.10 | <11.7 | >30 | [ |
| C/Fe3O4 NCs | 11 | Fruits | GC-MS | 0.12–0.55 | <9.7 | 2 | This work |