Literature DB >> 2973377

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty improves survival in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

L Lee1, E R Bates, B Pitt, J A Walton, N Laufer, W W O'Neill.   

Abstract

Modest survival benefits have been reported in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who were treated with early surgical revascularization or thrombolytic therapy. To determine whether coronary angioplasty improves survival, 87 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, from 1975 to 1985 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in group 1 (n = 59) were treated with conventional therapy; patients in group 2 (n = 24) were treated with conventional therapy and angioplasty. Extent of coronary artery disease, infarct location, and incidence of multivessel disease were similar between groups. Hemodynamic variables including cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were also similar. The 30-day survival was significantly improved for group 2 patients (50% vs. 17%, p = 0.006). Survival in group 2 patients with successful angioplasty was 77% (10 of 13 patients) versus 18% (two of 11 patients) in patients with unsuccessful angioplasty, (p = 0.006). The findings suggest that angioplasty improves survival in cardiogenic shock compared with conventional therapy with survival contingent upon successful reperfusion of the infarct-related artery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2973377     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.78.6.1345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  24 in total

Review 1.  Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: towards evidence based medical practice.

Authors:  S G Williams; D J Wright; L B Tan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Venu Menon; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Should older patients with acute myocardial infarction receive thrombolytic therapy?

Authors:  B D Williamson; D W Muller; E J Topol
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  The Open-Artery Hypothesis: An Overview.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Predictors of outcome after percutaneous treatment for cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  A G C Sutton; P Finn; J A Hall; A A Harcombe; R A Wright; M A de Belder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Heart failure and shock complicating acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Frederick A Spencer; Theo Meyer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Measurement of cardiac reserve in cardiogenic shock: implications for prognosis and management.

Authors:  L B Tan; W A Littler
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-08

Review 8.  Cardiogenic shock: therapy and prevention.

Authors:  W L Barry; I J Sarembock
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 9.  [Reperfusion therapy and mechanical circulatory support in patients in cardiogenic shock].

Authors:  K H Scholz
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Impaired coronary flow reserve immediately after coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M Ishihara; H Sato; H Tateishi; T Kawagoe; M Yoshimura; Y Muraoka
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.