Literature DB >> 29733717

Precision Medicines Have Faster Approvals Based On Fewer And Smaller Trials Than Other Medicines.

Lisette Pregelj1, Thomas J Hwang2, Damian C Hine3, Evan B Siegel4, Ross T Barnard5, Jonathan J Darrow6, Aaron S Kesselheim7.   

Abstract

Precision medicines can benefit patients by increasing the probability of a successful treatment response in selected patient populations. The potential for more immediate signals of efficacy during clinical trials suggests such medicines will reach the market more rapidly than traditional drugs will. Using data from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), we examined the regulatory review and pivotal trial characteristics of precision medicines. We found that in the period January 2013-June 2017, precision medicines were developed and reviewed almost two years faster than nonprecision medicines. In addition, approximately 48 percent of the precision medicines in our study qualified for the FDA's breakthrough therapy designation. Precision medicines were also approved based on fewer pivotal trials with fewer patients, and the trials were less likely to be randomized, blinded, or controlled with either an active or placebo comparator.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; Designations; Precision medicines; Speed; Trial size

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29733717     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  6 in total

1.  Reimbursement Matters: Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Accrual.

Authors:  Simon J Craddock Lee; Caitlin C Murphy; David E Gerber; Ann M Geiger; Ethan Halm; Rasmi G Nair; John V Cox; Jasmin A Tiro; Celette S Skinner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.178

2.  Assessment of Clinical Trials Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents, 1995-2017.

Authors:  Audrey D Zhang; Jeremy Puthumana; Nicholas S Downing; Nilay D Shah; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-04-01

3.  Precision Medicines' Impact on Orphan Drug Designation.

Authors:  Christine M Mueller; Gayatri R Rao; Katherine I Miller Needleman
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  Efficacy gap between phase II and subsequent phase III studies in oncology.

Authors:  Rick A Vreman; Svetlana V Belitser; Ana T M Mota; Anke M Hövels; Wim G Goettsch; Kit C B Roes; Hubert G M Leufkens; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  How do cancer clinicians perceive real-world data and the evidence derived therefrom? Findings from an international survey of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

Authors:  Robbe Saesen; Georgios Kantidakis; Ann Marinus; Denis Lacombe; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.988

6.  Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Comparing Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Reviews of Medicines in the United States and Europe.

Authors:  Rick A Vreman; Huseyin Naci; Wim G Goettsch; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Sebastian G Schneeweiss; Hubert G M Leufkens; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.875

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.