James Milligan1, Joseph Lee1, Loretta M Hillier2, Karen Slonim1, Catharine Craven3. 1. Centre for Family Medicine, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. 2. Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 3. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Lyndhurst Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify a set of essential components for primary care for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) for inclusion in a point-of-practice toolkit for primary care practitioners (PCP) and identification of the essential elements of SCI care that are required in primary care and those that should be the focus of specialist care. DESIGN: Modified Delphi consensus process; survey methodology. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Three family physicians, six specialist physicians, and five inter-disciplinary health professionals completed surveys. OUTCOME MEASURES: Importance of care elements for inclusion in the toolkit (9-point scale: 1 = lowest level of importance, 9 = greatest level of importance) and identification of most responsible physician (family physician, specialist) for completing key categories of care. Open-ended comments were solicited. RESULTS: There was consensus between the respondent groups on the level of importance of various care elements. Mean importance scores were highest for autonomic dysreflexia, pain, and skin care and lowest for preventive care, social issues, and vital signs. Although, there was agreement across all respondents that family physicians should assume responsibility for assessing mental health, there was variability in who should be responsible for other care categories. Comments were related to the need for shared care approaches and capacity building and lack of knowledge and specialized equipment as barriers to optimal care. CONCLUSION: This study identified important components of SCI care to be included in a point-of-practice toolkit to facilitate primary care for persons with SCI.
OBJECTIVE: To identify a set of essential components for primary care for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) for inclusion in a point-of-practice toolkit for primary care practitioners (PCP) and identification of the essential elements of SCI care that are required in primary care and those that should be the focus of specialist care. DESIGN: Modified Delphi consensus process; survey methodology. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Three family physicians, six specialist physicians, and five inter-disciplinary health professionals completed surveys. OUTCOME MEASURES: Importance of care elements for inclusion in the toolkit (9-point scale: 1 = lowest level of importance, 9 = greatest level of importance) and identification of most responsible physician (family physician, specialist) for completing key categories of care. Open-ended comments were solicited. RESULTS: There was consensus between the respondent groups on the level of importance of various care elements. Mean importance scores were highest for autonomic dysreflexia, pain, and skin care and lowest for preventive care, social issues, and vital signs. Although, there was agreement across all respondents that family physicians should assume responsibility for assessing mental health, there was variability in who should be responsible for other care categories. Comments were related to the need for shared care approaches and capacity building and lack of knowledge and specialized equipment as barriers to optimal care. CONCLUSION: This study identified important components of SCI care to be included in a point-of-practice toolkit to facilitate primary care for persons with SCI.
Authors: Avery B Nathens; Frederick P Rivara; Gregory J Jurkovich; Ronald V Maier; Jennifer M Johansen; Diane C Thompson Journal: J Trauma Date: 2003-03
Authors: Richard Birtwhistle; Neil R Bell; Brett D Thombs; Roland Grad; James A Dickinson Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Anthony E Chiodo; William M Scelza; Steven C Kirshblum; Lisa-Ann Wuermser; Chester H Ho; Michael M Priebe Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Michael J Taylor; Chris McNicholas; Chris Nicolay; Ara Darzi; Derek Bell; Julie E Reed Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Olena Bychkovska; Piotr Tederko; Julia Patrick Engkasan; Abderrazak Hajjioui; Armin Gemperli Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 2.908