Literature DB >> 29733086

Bench to Bedside: The Effectiveness of a Professional Development Program Focused on Biomedical Sciences and Action Research.

Houda A Darwiche1, Marianne B Barnes2, Lehman W Barnes2, Lou Ann Cooper3, Julie R Bokor4, Mary Jo Koroly5.   

Abstract

A three-year, National Institutes of Health-funded residential project at a southeastern research university immersed 83 secondary science teachers in a summer institute called "Bench to Bedside." Teachers were provided with knowledge, skills, experiences, and incentives to improve their science teaching and increase their awareness of scientific processes, technologies, and careers by examining the translational medicine continuum of basic to clinical research. This was done with the help of medical school researchers, clinical personnel, biotechnology entrepreneurs, program mentors, and prior year participants. A critical component of the institute was the preparation and implementation of an action research project that reflected teachers' newly acquired knowledge and skills. Action research proposals were critiqued by project team members and feedback provided prior to action research implementation in schools during the following year. Teachers shared their action research with colleagues and project team at a symposium and online as a critical step in networking the teachers. Results of a mixed methods program evaluation strategy indicate that the program produced significant gains in teachers' confidence to explain advanced biosciences topics, development of action research skills, and formation of a statewide biosciences network of key stakeholders. Constraints of time, variation in teacher content and action research background, technology availability, and school-related variables, among others, are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biotechnology; clinical and translational science; professional development; secondary science education

Year:  2017        PMID: 29733086      PMCID: PMC5930927     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Educ (Arlingt)        ISSN: 1094-3277


  7 in total

Review 1.  The involvement of genome researchers in high school science education.

Authors:  M Munn; P O Skinner; L Conn; H G Horsma; P Gregory
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Innovative tools for scientific and technological education in italian secondary schools.

Authors:  Annalisa Santucci; Roberta Mini; Elisa Ferro; Paola Martelli; Lorenza Trabalzini
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.160

4.  A CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF A HIGH SCHOOL BIOMEDICAL PIPELINE PROGRAM: DESIGN AND METHODS.

Authors:  Marilyn A Winkleby; Judith Ned; David Ahn; Alana Koehler; Kathleen Fagliano; Casey Crump
Journal:  J Sci Educ Technol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.315

5.  Inspiring careers in STEM and healthcare fields through medical simulation embedded in high school science education.

Authors:  Louis J Berk; Sharon L Muret-Wagstaff; Riya Goyal; Julie A Joyal; James A Gordon; Russell Faux; Nancy E Oriol
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  Global health: a successful context for precollege training and advocacy.

Authors:  Ana L Gervassi; Laura J Collins; Theresa B Britschgi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Fostering critical thinking, reasoning, and argumentation skills through bioethics education.

Authors:  Jeanne Ting Chowning; Joan Carlton Griswold; Dina N Kovarik; Laura J Collins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Forward Move: Interfacing Biotechnology and Physical Therapy In and Out of the Classroom.

Authors:  Randy D Trumbower; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-05-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.