Jared Scott1, Jake Xavier Checketts2, Jarryd G Horn2, Craig Cooper2, Matt Vassar2. 1. Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, 1111 W 17th St, Tulsa, 74107, USA. jared.t.scott@okstate.edu. 2. Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, 1111 W 17th St, Tulsa, 74107, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: An estimated 85% of research is of limited value or wasted because the wrong research questions are addressed. We sought to identify research gaps using American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon (AAOS) clinical practice guidelines Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Using these recommendations, we conducted searches of ClinicalTrials.gov to discover the extent to which new and ongoing research addresses areas of deficiency. METHODS: For each recommendation in the AAOS guidelines, we created participants, intervention, comparator, outcomes questions, and search strings using a systematic process. Searches were then conducted of ClinicalTrials.gov to locate relevant studies. RESULTS: Our searches of ClinicalTrials.gov returned 945 studies for surgical and 1416 for non-surgical management of osteoarthritis. Of the 945 studies returned using our search string for surgical trials, 186 (20%) were relevant to 30 (79%) of the 38 recommendations made within the surgical management guideline. Of the 1416 studies returned using our search for non-surgical trials, 360 (25%) were relevant to 16 (89%) of the 18 recommendations made within the conservative management guideline. CONCLUSIONS: The development of clinical practice guidelines is a unique opportunity to simultaneously redefine day-to-day decision-making and provide a critical analysis of the status of the literature. Upon our search of the literature since the guidelines introduction, we have found that some inconclusive areas have received more attention than others. Our results should guide researchers towards conducting research on the topics most in need and, by doing so, strengthen the clinical practice guideline recommendations.
PURPOSE: An estimated 85% of research is of limited value or wasted because the wrong research questions are addressed. We sought to identify research gaps using American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon (AAOS) clinical practice guidelines Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Using these recommendations, we conducted searches of ClinicalTrials.gov to discover the extent to which new and ongoing research addresses areas of deficiency. METHODS: For each recommendation in the AAOS guidelines, we created participants, intervention, comparator, outcomes questions, and search strings using a systematic process. Searches were then conducted of ClinicalTrials.gov to locate relevant studies. RESULTS: Our searches of ClinicalTrials.gov returned 945 studies for surgical and 1416 for non-surgical management of osteoarthritis. Of the 945 studies returned using our search string for surgical trials, 186 (20%) were relevant to 30 (79%) of the 38 recommendations made within the surgical management guideline. Of the 1416 studies returned using our search for non-surgical trials, 360 (25%) were relevant to 16 (89%) of the 18 recommendations made within the conservative management guideline. CONCLUSIONS: The development of clinical practice guidelines is a unique opportunity to simultaneously redefine day-to-day decision-making and provide a critical analysis of the status of the literature. Upon our search of the literature since the guidelines introduction, we have found that some inconclusive areas have received more attention than others. Our results should guide researchers towards conducting research on the topics most in need and, by doing so, strengthen the clinical practice guideline recommendations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical practice guidelines; Clinicaltrials.gov; Osteoarthritis; Research pipeline
Authors: David S Jevsevar; Gregory Alexander Brown; Dina L Jones; Elizabeth G Matzkin; Paul A Manner; Pekka Mooar; John T Schousboe; Steven Stovitz; James O Sanders; Kevin J Bozic; Michael J Goldberg; William Robert Martin; Deborah S Cummins; Patrick Donnelly; Anne Woznica; Leeaht Gross Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: C Tate Hepper; Jason J Halvorson; Stephen T Duncan; Andrew J M Gregory; Warren R Dunn; Kurt P Spindler Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Laura Martínez García; Andrea Juliana Sanabria; Elvira García Alvarez; Maria Mar Trujillo-Martín; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Anna Kotzeva; David Rigau; Arturo Louro-González; Leticia Barajas-Nava; Petra Díaz Del Campo; Maria-Dolors Estrada; Ivan Solà; Javier Gracia; Flavia Salcedo-Fernandez; Jennifer Lawson; R Brian Haynes; Pablo Alonso-Coello Journal: CMAJ Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Marita Cross; Emma Smith; Damian Hoy; Sandra Nolte; Ilana Ackerman; Marlene Fransen; Lisa Bridgett; Sean Williams; Francis Guillemin; Catherine L Hill; Laura L Laslett; Graeme Jones; Flavia Cicuttini; Richard Osborne; Theo Vos; Rachelle Buchbinder; Anthony Woolf; Lyn March Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Brian McGrory; Kristy Weber; John A Lynott; John C Richmond; Charles Moore Davis; Adolph Yates; Atul F Kamath; Vinod Dasa; Gregory Alexander Brown; Tad L Gerlinger; Tomas Villanueva; Sara Piva; James Hebl; David Jevsevar; Kevin G Shea; Kevin J Bozic; William Shaffer; Deborah Cummins; Jayson N Murray; Patrick Donnelly; Nilay Patel; Ben Brenton; Peter Shores; Anne Woznica; Erica Linskey; Kaitlyn Sevarino Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Lorenzo P Moja; Ivan Moschetti; Munira Nurbhai; Anna Compagnoni; Alessandro Liberati; Jeremy M Grimshaw; An-Wen Chan; Kay Dickersin; Karmela Krleza-Jeric; David Moher; Ida Sim; Jimmy Volmink Journal: Trials Date: 2009-07-22 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Mohamed Ahmed Said Ahmed; Emad Samuel Boles Saweeres; Nasr Awad Abdelkader; Salwa Fadl Abdelmajeed; Ahmed Roshdy Fares Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2019 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.251