Literature DB >> 29732156

High expression of miR-21 is not a predictor of poor prognosis in all patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Peng Sheng Yi1, Jian Shui Li1.   

Abstract

MicroRNA (miR)-21 has been identified as a novel biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the prognostic value of miR-21 expression in HCC remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to investigate the value of high expression of miR-21 in predicting the prognosis of HCC. Following a search through the PubMed, Science Citation Index, EMBASE and CNKI databases, a total of 9 studies investigating the expression of miR-21 in HCC and the association between high expression of miR-21 and prognosis of HCC were identified. It was observed that high expression of miR-21 was not associated with poor overall survival of all patients with HCC (P=0.52). However, high expression of miR-21 was found to be correlated with poor prognosis of HCC patients undergoing curative resection (hazard ratio = 2.36; P<0.01). It was also demonstrated that high expression of miR-21 was correlated with tumor size >5 cm [odds ratio (OR)=1.53; P=0.04], venous invasion (OR=4.86; P=0.01), TNM stage (OR=3.44; P<0.01) and liver cirrhosis (OR=2.12; P=0.03). It was concluded that miR-21 cannot be considered as a factor complementary to α-fetoprotein, microvascular invasion and advanced tumor stage in predicting the prognosis of all HCC patients. Higher expression of miR-21 may be a promising biomarker associated with certain clinicopathological characteristics of HCC, such as tumor size, venous invasion, TNM stage and liver cirrhosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hepatocellular carcinoma; miR-21; prognosis

Year:  2018        PMID: 29732156      PMCID: PMC5921297          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide, and ranks second as a cause of cancer-related mortality in China (1). The majority of the patients are diagnosed at an intermediate or advance stage owing to lack of surveillance. Currently, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is the most common staging system for HCC. BCLC divides HCC into three stages, namely early, intermediate and advanced (2,3). According to the BCLC recommendations, intermediate and advance HCC are not candidates for curative resection, indicating a relatively poor prognosis of these patients (4). Therefore, it is crucial to identify new biomarkers for early diagnosis and prediction of prognosis of HCC. MicroRNAs (miRs) are a class of non-coding RNAs (18–25 nucleotides) that bind to the 3′-untranslated region and regulate translation at the post-translational level (5). More than 3,700 miRs have been registered in the miRBase to date (6). Over the past decades, miRs have been found to play key roles in tumorigenesis, cancer progression and metastasis. In particular, miR-21 expression has been found to be upregulated in breast, lung and cervical cancer, as well as in HCC (7), and numerous studies have investigated the association between miR-21 expression and the prognosis of HCC (8–10). miR-21 is considered as a promising biomarker and treatment target in HCC, and several systematic reviews have investigated the association between miR-21 expression and the prognosis of HCC. Wang et al investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-21 in cancer, and observed that high expression of miR-21 was significantly correlated with poor prognosis of cancer patients; however, only two studies in their analysis reported survival data from HCC patients (11). Yan et al reported that miR-21 maybe complementary to α-fetoprotein (AFP) in the diagnosis of HCC, and that high expression of miR-21 indicated poor prognosis of HCC (12); however, only 4 studies were included in their review, which limits the reliability of their conclusions. Taking into consideration that different investigators reported inconsistent information on the role of miR-21 in HCC, the present systematic review was performed to investigate the value of miR-21 expression in predicting the prognosis of HCC.

Data collection methods

Search strategy and study selection

miR-21’ or ‘microRNA-21’ and ‘hepatocellular carcinoma’ or ‘HCC’ were used as mesh terms to search the PubMed, Science Citation Index, EMBASE and CNKI databases. There was no limitation in terms of publication year and region, but the language was limited to English. The cited references of the obtained articles were also scanned to identify additional relevant studies. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: Studies on the role of miR-21 expression in patients with HCC; and studies with adequate data on survival outcome and clinical characteristics. Studies were not eligible if they were reviews, letters, or conference abstracts. Studies designed on animals or cell lines, and studies without adequate data for survival analysis, were also excluded. The study selection process is summarized in Fig. 1.
Figure 1.

Flow diagram of study selection process. miR, microRNA.

Quality assessment

Two investigators independently assessed the quality of the included studies; if a disagreement emerged, a third investigator was contacted. The quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis was evaluated based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (13). Three aspects were generally assessed: Selection of the cohort, comparability of the cohort and ascertainment of the outcome (Table I). A study with a score of >5 was considered as being of high methodological quality (14).
Table I.

Quality assessment of the included studies.

StudySelection of cohortComparabilityAscertainment of the outcomeTotal score(Refs.)
Wang et al3238(25)
Huang et al2125(26)
Wang et al2136(27)
Wang et al2136(28)
Liu et al2125(29)
Gyöngyösi et al2136(30)
Karakatsanis et al3137(10)
Tomimaru et al3238(9)
Tomimaru et al2136(8)

Data extraction

Two investigators independently extracted baseline characteristics from each study, including study name, publication year, country, patient number, tumor stage, specimens, RNA detection method and cut-off value of miR-21 expression. Survival data and clinical characteristics were also extracted. The survival outcome was measured by overall survival (OS) rate, and the clinical characteristics included tumor size, tumor number, differentiation, venous invasion, TNM stage and liver cirrhosis. Differentiation was classified as high or low (moderate differentiation was classified as low), and the TNM stage was divided into stages I+II and III+IV.

Statistical analysis

Prognostic efficacy was measured by pooled hazard ratio (HR) of OS with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). If the HR of OS was not provided directly in the main text, it was calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves, as described by Tierney et al (15). The correlation between miR-21 expression and clinical characteristics was measured by odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI. All OR values were calculated by the Chi-square test using data provided by the investigations. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and Higgins's I2 statistics; P<0.1 was considered to indicate significant heterogeneity. If heterogeneity was detected, the random-effects model was used; otherwise, the fixed-effects model was adopted. Publication bias was detected by funnel plots. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. All the statistics were performed by RevMan software, version 5.3 (Cochrane, London, UK).

Results

Characteristics of included studies

A total of 86 studies were obtained following an initial search through the PubMed, Science Citation Index, Embase and CNKI databases. A total of 21 studies were initially excluded (conference abstracts, reviews, systematic reviews, or studies investigating other miRs). A further 53 studies were excluded after scanning the abstracts, as they did not meet the inclusion criteria, and another 3 studies were excluded following a full-text review. Finally, 9 studies were included in the analysis. The baseline characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table II.
Table II.

Baseline characteristics of the included studies.

StudyYearCountryStagePatient no.SpecimenMethodCut-off value(Refs.)
Wang et al2015ChinaTNM I–IV  97SerumRT-PCRMedian(25)
Huang et al2015ChinaTNM I–IV112TissueRT-PCRMedian(26)
Wang et al2014ChinaTNM I–IV119TissueRT-PCRMedian(27)
Wang et al2014ChinaTNM I–IV  30SerumRT-PCR5-fold of control(28)
Liu et al2014ChinaBCLC A-C136SerumRT-PCRMedian(29)
Gyöngyösi et al2014ItalyNR  20TissueRT-PCRMedian(30)
Karakatsanis et al2013GreeceTNM I–IV  60TissueRT-PCR3.07-fold of control(10)
Tomimaru et al2012JapanTNM I–IIIa126PlasmaRT-PCR0.754(9)
Tomimaru et al2010JapanBCLC C  30TissueRT-PCRMedian(8)

TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

Correlation between high miR-21 expression and prognosis of HCC

A total of 6 studies reported the HR of the OS of patients with HCC. Significant heterogeneity was detected among these 6 studies (I2=81%, P<0.1) and the random-effects model was used to estimate the overall effect. It was observed that high expression of miR-21 was not correlated with poor OS in HCC patients (HR=1.21; 95% CI: 0.68–2.16; P=0.52; Fig. 2). No publication bias was identified by the Begg's test (P>0.05; Fig. 3).
Figure 2.

Analysis of correlation between miR-21 expression and overall survival of all patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. miR, microRNA; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 3.

Funnel plot of overall survival. SE, standard error.

A total of 3 studies reported data on the association between the expression of miR-21 and the survival of HCC patients receiving curative resection. No significant heterogeneity was observed among these 3 studies and the fixed-effects model was used to estimate the overall effect. Subgroup analysis revealed that high expression of miR-21 was associated with poor OS (HR=2.36; 95% CI: 1.52–3.66; P<0.01) in HCC patients receiving curative resection (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.

Subgroup analysis of high expression of miR-21 in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving curative resection. miR, microRNA; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.

Association of high expression of miR-21 with clinical characteristics of HCC

It was observed that high expression of miR-21 was correlated with tumor size >5 cm (OR=1.53; 95% CI: 1.01–2.32; P=0.04), venous invasion (OR=4.86; 95% CI: 1.47–16.08; P=0.01), TNM stage (OR=3.44; 95% CI: 1.56–7.59; P<0.01) and liver cirrhosis (OR=2.12; 95% CI: 1.07–4.23; P=0.03). However, high expression of miR-21 was not found to be significantly correlated with tumor number (P=0.44) or differentiation (P=0.83). Details on the association of high expression of miR-21 with the clinical characteristics of HCC are presented in Figs. 5–8.
Figure 5.

Correlation of high expression of miR-21 with tumor size. miR, microRNA; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 8.

Correlation of high expression of miR-21 with liver cirrhosis. miR, microRNA; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

In the present analysis, higher miR-21 expression was not found to be significantly associated with poor prognosis of all HCC patients; however, high expression of miR-21 was found to be correlated with poor prognosis of HCC patients receiving curative resection. Zhou et al reported that miR-21 may be a potential prognostic biomarker for several carcinomas, including breast, colon and lung cancer, with an HR of 1.91, and the subgroup analysis revealed that elevated miR-21 expression was associated with poor prognosis of liver cancer based on the results of 3 studies (16); however, those 3 studies differed in the pathological type of the liver cancer (2 studies enrolled patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma, whereas1 enrolled patients with HCC). Thus, it is difficult to assess the prognostic value of miR-21 in HCC from that study. Subsequently, Wang et al investigated the value of miR-21 in cancer diagnosis and prognosis, and concluded that miR-21 may be a prognostic marker in digestive tract cancers with an HR of 5.77 (11), whereas only 2 studies were designed to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-21 in HCC, in which the small patient sample limited the reliability of the conclusions. Yan et al investigated the prognostic and diagnostic value of miR-21 in early HCC, based on the pooled results of sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve, and concluded that miR-21 may be a complementary factor in HCC diagnosis (12); in addition, the pooled results suggested that high expression of miR-21 was associated with poor OS of early HCC. That study by Yan et al only enrolled patients with early HCC; however, as our study enrolled patients with early and intermediate HCC, our patient sample was more representative of that patient population. In our review, 6 studies with a total of 730 patients were eligible for analysis, covering all stages of HCC, and the larger patient sample in our analysis made the findings more reliable compared with the abovementioned studies. Subgroup analysis revealed that high expression of miR-21 was correlated with poor prognosis of HCC patients receiving curative resection. Previous studies demonstrated that miR-21 may promote liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy (17,18). It may be hypothesized that miR-21 can simultaneously promote liver regeneration in normal hepatocytes and tumor cells, resulting in poor prognosis of HCC patients receiving liver resection; however, the mechanism underlying the association of miR-21 expression and poor prognosis of HCC following resection requires further investigation. On investigating the correlation between higher miR-21 expression and the clinical characteristics of HCC, it was observed that higher miR-21 expression was significantly correlated with tumor size >5 cm, venous invasion, TNM stage and liver cirrhosis. Yan et al also observed that higher expression of miR-21 was associated with HCC TNM stage (12), which was consistent with our findings. However, compared with the findings of Yan et al, we found that more clinical characteristics were associated with higher miR-21 expression. Considering the mechanism underlying the role of miR-21 in HCC, various studies have reported potential signaling of miR-21 in tumorigenesis, progression and metastasis of HCC. Verified targets of miR-21 include RASGRP1, BCL2, RPS7, PTEN, E2F1 and PDCD4 (6,19). Modulation of miR-21 has been shown to regulate the translation of PTEN; hence, miR-21 may play a key role in PTEN-dependent pathways involved in cancer cell growth, migration and invasion (20,21). Recently, miR-21 has been demonstrated to mediate sorafenib resistance of HCC by suppressing autophagy via the PTEN/Akt pathway (22). PDCD4 is a known tumor suppressor mediating the apoptosis of tumor cells and repressing the development of HCC. miR-21 was demonstrated to promote migration and invasion via the miR-21-PDCD4-AP-1 feedback loop in HCC (23), and Qiu et al reported that miR-21 may deregulate the expression of PDCD4 in patients with hepatitis B virus infection, and promote tumorigenicity (24). Taken together, these findings indicate that miR-21 may promote tumor cell growth, migration and invasion, and inhibit tumor cell apoptosis through various pathways, resulting in tumor lesions of a larger size, higher incidence of venous invasion and more advance stage. The present study had certain limitations: First, heterogeneity was observed between studies included in the survival analysis and the test specimens of miR-21 differed among these studies, which increased the selection bias and decreased the reliability of our results. Second, the OR values were calculated from data provided in the main text, and most investigators had not provided the precise OR values in their studies. Third, the sample size of the studies included in our analysis was still comparatively small, and more well-designed studies are required to elucidate the prognostic value of miR-21 in HCC. In conclusion, miR-21 cannot be considered as a factor complementary to AFP, microvascular invasion and advanced tumor stage in predicting the prognosis of HCC. However, higher expression of miR-21 may be a promising biomarker associated with certain clinicopathological characteristics of HCC, such as tumor size, venous invasion, TNM stage and liver cirrhosis.
  30 in total

1.  Investigation of the value of miR-21 in the diagnosis of early stage HCC and its prognosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Yan; Z J Liu; S Yu; Y X Bao
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2015-09-28

2.  Inhibition of miR-21 rescues liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in ethanol-fed rats.

Authors:  Egle Juskeviciute; Rachael P Dippold; Anil N Antony; Aditi Swarup; Rajanikanth Vadigepalli; Jan B Hoek
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  MicroRNA-21 promotes cell proliferation in human hepatocellular carcinoma partly by targeting HEPN1.

Authors:  Shuxiang Hu; Ruiyang Tao; Shouyu Wang; Chaoqun Wang; Xiankun Zhao; Hua Zhao; Lijuan Li; Shaohua Zhu; Yan He; Xinghong Jiang; Yuzhen Gao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  miR-21 promotes migration and invasion by the miR-21-PDCD4-AP-1 feedback loop in human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Qin Zhu; Zhiming Wang; Yu Hu; Jindong Li; Xinying Li; Ledu Zhou; Yun Huang
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  MicroRNA-21 suppresses PTEN and hSulf-1 expression and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through AKT/ERK pathways.

Authors:  Longlong Bao; Yan Yan; Can Xu; Weidan Ji; Shuwen Shen; Gaoya Xu; Yong Zeng; Bin Sun; Haihua Qian; Lei Chen; Mengchao Wu; Changqing Su; Jie Chen
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  HBx-mediated miR-21 upregulation represses tumor-suppressor function of PDCD4 in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  X Qiu; S Dong; F Qiao; S Lu; Y Song; Y Lao; Y Li; T Zeng; J Hu; L Zhang; L Zhang; H Fan
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jayne F Tierney; Lesley A Stewart; Davina Ghersi; Sarah Burdett; Matthew R Sydes
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers' to authors' assessments.

Authors:  Carson Ka-Lok Lo; Dominik Mertz; Mark Loeb
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Expression of serum exosomal microRNA-21 in human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hongwei Wang; Lijuan Hou; Aihui Li; Yuxiu Duan; Haili Gao; Xinwen Song
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Circulating Cancer Biomarkers: The Macro-revolution of the Micro-RNA.

Authors:  Francesca Montani; Fabrizio Bianchi
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 8.143

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Dairy consumption and hepatocellular carcinoma risk.

Authors:  Bodo C Melnik
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

2.  Micro RNA Sensing with Green Emitting Silver Nanoclusters.

Authors:  Liam E Yourston; Alexey V Krasnoslobodtsev
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  MicroRNA and liver cancer.

Authors:  Masaya Onishi; Takahiro Ochiya; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2020-04-17

4.  The Role of hsa-miR-21 and Its Target Genes Involved in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Thuan Duc Lao; Minh Trong Quang; Thuy Ai Huyen Le
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 5.  Role of MicroRNAs Induced by Chinese Herbal Medicines Against Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Brief Review.

Authors:  Ge Guo; Juhua Zhou; Xiaogaung Yang; Jiang Feng; Yanxia Shao; Tingting Jia; Qingrong Huang; Yanmin Li; Yin Zhong; Prakash S Nagarkatti; Mitzi Nagarkatti
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 3.279

6.  Micro-RNA-21 rs1292037 A>G polymorphism can predict hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis (HCC), and plays a key role in cell proliferation and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in HCC cell model of IRI.

Authors:  Chaoyu Wu; Gongen Tang; Xiaoying Wang; Jian Zhang; Shuhua Chen; Cuihong Lu; Dongqin Zhang; Yun Li
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.484

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.