| Literature DB >> 29732023 |
Cangul Keskin1, Evren Sarıyılmaz2, Murat Demiral3.
Abstract
Background. The present study aimed to compare the shaping ability of Reciproc Blue instruments with or without the creation of a glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals. Methods. Root canals of thirty #15.02 clear resin S-shaped blocks were dyed using ink and photographed. Then the blocks were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A: Reciproc Blue with glide path created with ProGlider and group B: Reciproc Blue with no glide path preparation (n=15). The blocks were also photographed after preparation. The pre- and post-prepara-tion images were superimposed and evaluated at 9 different measurement points according to the 3 zones, as coronal straight, first curvature, and apical curvature zones. The data were evaluated with independent t-test or Kruskal-Wallis tests with 5% significance interval. Results. Group B removed greater amount of material from the inner aspect of simulated canal at the first curvature and apical curvature zones and from the outer aspect of the canal at apical curvature zone (P<0.05). Both groups exhibited trans-portation and the transportation width in group B was significantly greater in the levels of apical curvature zone (P<0.05). Conclusion. Glide path preparation using ProGlider rotary instrument improved the shaping ability of Reciproc Blue R25 instrument by leading to less transportation and maintaining centering ability.Entities:
Keywords: Glide path; Nickel-titanium instruments; Root canal preparation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29732023 PMCID: PMC5928477 DOI: 10.15171/joddd.2018.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects ISSN: 2008-210X
Figure 1
Figure 2Mean and standard deviation values for the amount of removed material detected at 9 different levels (mm)
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.26±0.05 | 0.28±0.04 | 0.448 | 0.17±0.02 | 0.22±0.05 | 0.001* |
|
| 0.26±0.07 | 0.27±0.05 | 0.657 | 0.15±0.03 | 0.23±0.11 | 0.024* |
|
| 0.22±0.05 | 0.26±0.10 | 0.151 | 0.19±0.04 | 0.26±0.13 | 0.048* |
|
| 0.23±0.04 | 0.25±0.07 | 0.319 | 0.20±0.03 | 0.25±0.10 | 0.085 |
|
| 0.29±0.03 | 0.35±0.09 | 0.036* | 0.16±0.02 | 0.20±0.11 | 0.221 |
|
| 0.23±0.07 | 0.38±0.10 | 0.000* | 0.21±0.06 | 0.27±0.08 | 0.045* |
|
| 0.12±0.06 | 0.17±0.08 | 0.153 | 0.24±0.08 | 0.34±0.05 | 0.001* |
|
| 0.07±0.02 | 0.09±0.01 | 0.635 | 0.21±0.09 | 0.39±0.03 | 0.000* |
|
| 0.06 ±0.03 | 0.29±0.04 | 0.000* | 0.01±0.00 | 0.10±0.03 | 0.000* |
P-values marked with * mean statistically significant difference between ProGlider-Reciproc Blue and Reciproc Blue groups (P<0.05).
CS, coronal straight zone; FC, first curvature zone; AC, apical curvature zone
Mean and standard deviation values for the amount of transportation irrespective of the direction at 9 measurement levels (mm)
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.04±0.06 | 0.11±0.05 | 0.004* |
|
| 0.04±0.14 | 0.10±0.07 | 0.367 |
|
| 0.00±0.21 | 0.03±0.06 | 0.599 |
|
| 0.00±0.15 | 0.00±0.21 | 0.579 |
|
| 0.13±0.04 | 0.14±0.19 | 0.716 |
|
| 0.02±0.11 | 0.11±0.18 | 0.216 |
|
| 0.11±0.12 | 0.17±0.13 | 0.267 |
|
| 0.12±0.09 | 0.29±0.04 | 0.000* |
|
| 0.06±0.03 | 0.19±0.05 | 0.000* |
P-values marked with *mean statistically significant difference between ProGlider-Reciproc Blue and Reciproc Blue groups (P<0.05).
Centering ratio means and standard deviations detected at 9 different levels
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.79±0.15 | 0.60±0.14 | 0.001* |
|
| 0.59±0.15 | 0.60±0.20 | 0.826 |
|
| 0.77±0.14 | 0.58±0.25 | 0.018* |
|
| 0.82±0.18 | 0.67±0.22 | 0.056 |
|
| 0.57±0.10 | 0.47±0.22 | 0.165 |
|
| 0.75±0.23 | 0.68±0.27 | 0.444 |
|
| 0.54±0.27 | 0.54±0.33 | 0.994 |
|
| 0.48±0.25 | 0.24±0.04 | 0.001* |
|
| 0.76±0.16 | 0.56±0.20 | 0.001* |
P-values marked with *mean statistically significant difference between ProGlider-Reciproc Blue and Reciproc Blue groups(P<0.05).