Literature DB >> 29731415

How Mouse-tracking Can Advance Social Cognitive Theory.

Paul E Stillman1, Xi Shen2, Melissa J Ferguson2.   

Abstract

Mouse-tracking - measuring computer-mouse movements made by participants while they choose between response options - is an emerging tool that offers an accessible, data-rich, and real-time window into how people categorize and make decisions. In the present article we review recent research in social cognition that uses mouse-tracking to test models and advance theory. In particular, mouse-tracking allows examination of nuanced predictions about both the nature of conflict (e.g., its antecedents and consequences) as well as how this conflict is resolved (e.g., how decisions evolve). We demonstrate how mouse-tracking can further our theoretical understanding by highlighting research in two domains - social categorization and self-control. We conclude with future directions and a discussion of the limitations of mouse-tracking as a method.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mouse-tracking; process tracing; real-time methods; self-control; social categorization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29731415     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  17 in total

1.  Dynamic interactive theory as a domain-general account of social perception.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Ryan M Stolier; Jeffrey A Brooks
Journal:  Adv Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-11-12

2.  Using dynamic monitoring of choices to predict and understand risk preferences.

Authors:  Paul E Stillman; Ian Krajbich; Melissa J Ferguson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Tracking continuities in the flanker task: From continuous flow to movement trajectories.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; Katie A Smith; Jeff Moher
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Hands-on false memories: a combined study with distributional semantics and mouse-tracking.

Authors:  Daniele Gatti; Marco Marelli; Giuliana Mazzoni; Tomaso Vecchi; Luca Rinaldi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-07-18

5.  Design factors in mouse-tracking: What makes a difference?

Authors:  Pascal J Kieslich; Martin Schoemann; Tobias Grage; Johanna Hepp; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

Review 6.  Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science.

Authors:  Martin Schoemann; Denis O'Hora; Rick Dale; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12-14

Review 7.  Minding One's Reach (To Eat): The Promise of Computer Mouse-Tracking to Study Self-Regulation of Eating.

Authors:  Richard B Lopez; Paul E Stillman; Todd F Heatherton; Jonathan B Freeman
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-05-22

8.  Mouse movement measures enhance the stop-signal task in adult ADHD assessment.

Authors:  Anton Leontyev; Takashi Yamauchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Lost to translation: How design factors of the mouse-tracking procedure impact the inference from action to cognition.

Authors:  Tobias Grage; Martin Schoemann; Pascal J Kieslich; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Social Transmission of Leadership Preference: Knowledge of Group Membership and Partisan Media Reporting Moderates Perceptions of Leadership Ability From Facial Cues to Competence and Dominance.

Authors:  Christopher D Watkins; Dengke Xiao; David I Perrett
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.