S W F Middleton1, P J Schranz2, V I Mandalia2, A D Toms2. 1. Exeter Knee Reconstruction Unit (EKRU), Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom. Electronic address: simon.middleton@nhs.net. 2. Exeter Knee Reconstruction Unit (EKRU), Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The surgical management of isolated medial compartment degenerative disease of the knee causes debate. Unicompartmental arthroplasty options include fixed and mobile bearing implant designs with fixed bearing becoming increasingly popular. We present the largest cohort of a fixed bearing single radius design, Stryker Triathlon Partial Knee Replacement (PKR). METHODS: We prospectively collected demographic data and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) on our cohort of PKR implants since its adoption in our unit, 2009 until March 2015. RESULTS: A total of 129 implants in 115 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (2.5 to 8.5 years) were included. There were 11 revisions at an average of 1.7 years (0.6-4.1 years), two for infection, two for mal-alignment, five for progression of disease and two for loosening. The survivorship of the implants at five years is 90%. CONCLUSION: The PKR provides good survivorship at five years and PROM scores that are equal to the largest and most popular comparable implants. There is an associated learning curve with this implant, as there is with all systems and this is reflected in our results. Crown
BACKGROUND: The surgical management of isolated medial compartment degenerative disease of the knee causes debate. Unicompartmental arthroplasty options include fixed and mobile bearing implant designs with fixed bearing becoming increasingly popular. We present the largest cohort of a fixed bearing single radius design, Stryker Triathlon Partial Knee Replacement (PKR). METHODS: We prospectively collected demographic data and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) on our cohort of PKR implants since its adoption in our unit, 2009 until March 2015. RESULTS: A total of 129 implants in 115 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (2.5 to 8.5 years) were included. There were 11 revisions at an average of 1.7 years (0.6-4.1 years), two for infection, two for mal-alignment, five for progression of disease and two for loosening. The survivorship of the implants at five years is 90%. CONCLUSION: The PKR provides good survivorship at five years and PROM scores that are equal to the largest and most popular comparable implants. There is an associated learning curve with this implant, as there is with all systems and this is reflected in our results. Crown
Authors: Joseph P Barbera; Ryan C Xiao; Christine S Williams; Jashvant Poeran; Calin S Moucha; Darwin D Chen; Brett L Hayden Journal: J Orthop Date: 2022-09-14
Authors: Brian J Carlson; Adam S Gerry; Jeffrey D Hassebrock; Zachary K Christopher; Mark J Spangehl; Joshua S Bingham Journal: Arthroplasty Date: 2022-06-03