Literature DB >> 29729855

Addressing Potential Health Disparities in the Adoption of Advanced Breast Imaging Technologies.

Randy C Miles1, Tracy Onega2, Christoph I Lee3.   

Abstract

With the advent of new screening technologies, including digital breast tomosynthesis, screening ultrasound, and breast magnetic resonance imaging, there is growing concern that existing disparities among traditionally underserved populations will worsen. These newer screening modalities purport improved cancer detection over mammography alone but are not offered at all screening facilities and often require a larger co-pay or out-of-pocket expense. Thus, the potential for worsening disparities with regard to access and appropriate utilization of supplemental screening technologies exists. Currently, there is a dearth of literature on the topic of health disparities related to access and the use of supplemental breast cancer screening and their impact on outcomes. Identifying and addressing explanatory factors for persistent and potentially worsening disparities remain a central focus of efforts to improve equity in breast cancer care. Therefore, this paper provides an overview of factors that may contribute to present and future disparities in breast cancer screening and outcomes, and explores specific relevant topics requiring greater research efforts as more personalized, multimodality breast cancer screening approaches are adopted into clinical practice.
Copyright © 2018 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced Imaging; Breast Cancer; Health Disparities

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29729855      PMCID: PMC6420779          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

1.  Relationship between body mass index and malignancy rates of MRI-guided breast biopsies: impact of clinicodemographic factors.

Authors:  Annie Tang; Caitlin M Cohan; Keith S Hansen; Genna Beattie; Heather I Greenwood; Rita A Mukhtar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Comparative Access to and Use of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening by Women's Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Weiwei Zhu; Tracy Onega; Louise M Henderson; Karla Kerlikowske; Brian L Sprague; Garth H Rauscher; Ellen S O'Meara; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Roberta diFlorio-Alexander; Celia Kaplan; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

3.  Ten years of China's new healthcare reform: a longitudinal study on changes in health resources.

Authors:  Jiang Chen; Zhuochen Lin; Xiaoxu Xie; Liangcheng Xiao; Li-An Li; Jing Li; Yuyao Wang; Yu Pan; Jie Yang; Chuncong Xu; Xiaojing Zeng
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Downstream Mammary and Extramammary Cascade Services and Spending Following Screening Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Mammography Among Commercially Insured Women.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Nancy L Keating; Nitya Thakore; Joyce Lii; Sughra Raza; Lydia E Pace
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

5.  Guest Editorial for: "Addressing Disparities Related to Access of Multimodality Breast Imaging Services Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic".

Authors:  Carolynn M DeBenedectis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge in a Mammography Screening Cohort of Predominantly Hispanic Women: Does Breast Density Notification Matter?

Authors:  Jessica D Austin; Mariangela Agovino; Carmen B Rodriguez; Mary Beth Terry; Rachel C Shelton; Ying Wei; Elise Desperito; Karen M Schmitt; Rita Kukafka; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Outcomes by Race in Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Nila Alsheik; Linda Blount; Qiu Qiong; Melinda Talley; Scott Pohlman; Kathleen Troeger; Genevieve Abbey; Victoria L Mango; Erica Pollack; Alice Chong; Greg Donadio; Michael Behling; Kathleen Mortimer; Emily Conant
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 6.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.