Literature DB >> 29729392

Imaging vascular and hemodynamic features of the brain using dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

C Chad Quarles1, Laura C Bell2, Ashley M Stokes2.   

Abstract

In the context of neurologic disorders, dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI provide valuable insights into cerebral vascular function, integrity, and architecture. Even after two decades of use, these modalities continue to evolve as their biophysical and kinetic basis is better understood, with improvements in pulse sequences and accelerated imaging techniques and through application of more robust and automated data analysis strategies. Here, we systematically review each of these elements, with a focus on how their integration improves kinetic parameter accuracy and the development of new hemodynamic biomarkers that provide sub-voxel sensitivity (e.g., capillary transit time and flow heterogeneity). Regarding contrast mechanisms, we discuss the dipole-dipole interactions and susceptibility effects that give rise to simultaneous T1, T2 and T2∗ relaxation effects, including their quantification, influence on pulse sequence parameter optimization, and use in methods such as vessel size and vessel architectural imaging. The application of technologic advancements, such as parallel imaging, simultaneous multi-slice, undersampled k-space acquisitions, and sliding window strategies, enables improved spatial and/or temporal resolution of DSC and DCE acquisitions. Such acceleration techniques have also enabled the implementation of, clinically feasible, simultaneous multi-echo spin- and gradient echo acquisitions, providing more comprehensive and quantitative interrogation of T1, T2 and T2∗ changes. Characterizing these relaxation rate changes through different post-processing options allows for the quantification of hemodynamics and vascular permeability. The application of different biophysical models provides insight into traditional hemodynamic parameters (e.g., cerebral blood volume) and more advanced parameters (e.g., capillary transit time heterogeneity). We provide insight into the appropriate selection of biophysical models and the necessary post-processing steps to ensure reliable measurements while minimizing potential sources of error. We show representative examples of advanced DSC- and DCE-MRI methods applied to pathologic conditions affecting the cerebral microcirculation, including brain tumors, stroke, aging, and multiple sclerosis. The maturation and standardization of conventional DSC- and DCE-MRI techniques has enabled their increased integration into clinical practice and use in clinical trials, which has, in turn, spurred renewed interest in their technological and biophysical development, paving the way towards a more comprehensive assessment of cerebral hemodynamics.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI; Perfusion; Vascular permeability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29729392      PMCID: PMC6538021          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Accelerated whole-brain perfusion imaging using a simultaneous multislice spin-echo and gradient-echo sequence with joint virtual coil reconstruction.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; Berkin Bilgic; Congyu Liao; SoHyun Han; Thomas Witzel; Yi-Fen Yen; Kawin Setsompop
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Evaluation of single bolus, dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocols in brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Ashley M Stokes; Maurizio Bergamino; Lea Alhilali; Leland S Hu; John P Karis; Leslie C Baxter; Laura C Bell; C Chad Quarles
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 6.960

Review 3.  Advances in translational imaging of the microcirculation.

Authors:  Marie Guerraty; Akanksha Bhargava; Janaka Senarathna; Asher A Mendelson; Arvind P Pathak
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.679

4.  Automated MRI perfusion-diffusion mismatch estimation may be significantly different in individual patients when using different software packages.

Authors:  Hannes Deutschmann; Nicole Hinteregger; Ulrike Wießpeiner; Markus Kneihsl; Simon Fandler-Höfler; Manuela Michenthaler; Christian Enzinger; Eva Hassler; Stefan Leber; Gernot Reishofer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Time-efficient measurement of subtle blood-brain barrier leakage using a T1 mapping MRI protocol at 7 T.

Authors:  Marieke van den Kerkhof; Paulien H M Voorter; Lisanne P W Canjels; Joost J A de Jong; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Abraham A Kroon; Jacobus F A Jansen; Walter H Backes
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Image-based personalization of computational models for predicting response of high-grade glioma to chemoradiation.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Karine A Al Feghali; Andrew M Elliott; Thomas E Yankeelov; Caroline Chung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Investigating the relationship between multi-scale perfusion and white matter microstructural integrity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.

Authors:  Nicholas J Sisco; Aimee Borazanci; Richard Dortch; Ashley M Stokes
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2021-07-29

Review 8.  Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher Kurz; Giulia Buizza; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Moritz Rabe; Chiara Paganelli; Guido Baroni; Michael Reiner; Paul J Keall; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Marco Riboldi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Optimal Control Theory for Personalized Therapeutic Regimens in Oncology: Background, History, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Danial Faghihi; David A Hormuth Ii; Ernesto A B F Lima; John Virostko; George Biros; Debra Patt; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Hemodynamic Imaging in Cerebral Diffuse Glioma-Part A: Concept, Differential Diagnosis and Tumor Grading.

Authors:  Lelio Guida; Vittorio Stumpo; Jacopo Bellomo; Christiaan Hendrik Bas van Niftrik; Martina Sebök; Moncef Berhouma; Andrea Bink; Michael Weller; Zsolt Kulcsar; Luca Regli; Jorn Fierstra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.