Literature DB >> 29729074

Liver regeneration accelerates hepatitis B virus-related tumorigenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chiao-Fang Teng1,2, Hong-Yi Chang3, Hung-Wen Tsai4,5, Wen-Chuan Hsieh6, Yu-Hao Kuo2, Ih-Jen Su3,4,6, Yih-Jyh Lin7,8,9.   

Abstract

Although partial hepatectomy (PH) to remove tumors provides a potential cure of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), long-term survival of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC patients after PH remains a big challenge. Early recurrence within 2 years post-PH is associated with the dissemination of primary HCC. However, late recurrence after 2 years post-PH is supposed due to the de novo or a secondary tumor. Since PH initiates liver regeneration (LR), we hypothesize that LR may accelerate tumorigenesis through activation of pre-existing precancerous lesions in the remaining liver. In this study, we explored the potential role of several LR-related factors in the de novo recurrence in a HBV X protein (HBx) transgenic mouse model receiving PH to mimic human HCC development. Following PH, we observed that tumor development was significantly accelerated from 16.9 to 10.4 months in HBx transgenic mice. The expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) family proteins was remarkably suppressed in livers of HBx transgenic relative to non-transgenic mice from early to late stages after PH as compared with non-PH mice. The expression of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)/Smad pathway, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), Myc, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and β-Catenin also showed a significant difference between livers of HBx transgenic and non-transgenic mice at variable time points after PH in comparison with non-PH mice. Taken together, our results provide an explanation for the high de novo recurrence of HBV-related HCC after PH, probably through induction of the sequential changes of LR-related SOCS family proteins, growth factors, and transcription factors, which may promote growth on the precancerous remnant liver.
© 2018 The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hepatitis B virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver regeneration; partial hepatectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29729074      PMCID: PMC6026873          DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Oncol        ISSN: 1574-7891            Impact factor:   6.603


alanine aminotransferase hepatitis B virus hepatitis B X protein hepatocellular carcinoma hepatitis C virus hepatocyte growth factor liver regeneration peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐γ coactivator‐1α partial hepatectomy standard deviation suppressor of cytokine signaling signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 transforming growth factor‐β vascular endothelial growth factor‐A

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks top in the 10 leading causes of cancer‐related deaths worldwide and develops primarily in patients with chronic hepatitis B or C virus (HBV or HCV) infection (El‐Serag, 2012). Although partial hepatectomy (PH) provides a potentially curative procedure for the treatment of HCC (Kishi et al., 2011), the recurrence rate 5 years after surgery is as high as 70%, contributing to poor patient survival (Grazi et al., 2001; Nakashima et al., 2003; Tang et al., 2004). It is therefore critical and urgently needed to explore the underlying mechanism of high recurrence of HCC after PH. HCC recurrence after PH can be classified into early and late recurrence according to the timing of recurrence by 2‐year cut‐off (Bruix et al., 2005; Hoshida et al., 2010). Early recurrence is usually associated with the dissemination of ‘primary’ tumor or intrahepatic invasion, whereas late recurrence occurs mainly due to multicentric carcinogenesis or ‘de novo’ recurrence from the precursor dysplastic lesions in the remaining liver after PH. Although the molecular signatures associated with early HCC recurrence have been characterized (Iizuka et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2015), few reports concern the predictors or mechanisms for the de novo HCC recurrence. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the de novo recurrence of HCC after PH, e.g. cancer stem cells, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and the dysregulation of liver regeneration (LR)‐related proteins (Michalopoulos, 2010). There are a series of scenarios of LR‐related molecular events operating after PH (Yin et al., 2013). Among them, the suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) family proteins, including SOCS1–7, which function as negative regulators or tumor suppressors to suppress cytokine‐mediated cell growth, play a key role in the termination of LR at the late phase after PH (Kurinna and Barton, 2011). In addition, several growth and transcription factors, such as transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β)/Smad pathway, vascular endothelial growth factor‐A (VEGF‐A), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), Myc, peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐γ coactivator‐1α (PGC1‐α), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and β‐Catenin have also been reported to be related to LR after PH (Bockhorn et al., 2007; Fausto et al., 2006; Kurinna and Barton, 2011; Moh et al., 2007; Monga et al., 2001; Sanders et al., 2012; Zhong et al., 2010). However, the role of these LR‐related factors in HBV‐related HCC recurrence after PH has not yet been well elucidated. Recently, the ground glass hepatocytes, which harbor two HBV oncoproteins, the pre‐S mutant surface antigen and the hepatitis B X protein (HBx), have been proposed as the precursor lesions of HCC (Wu et al., 2014; Yen et al., 2016). HBx is an etiologic factor of HBV‐related hepatocarcinogenesis through its multiple functions in regulation of cell cycle, cell proliferation, lipid metabolism, signal transduction, and gene transcription (Arbuthnot et al., 2000; Chisari et al., 1989; Teng et al., 2016). Overexpression of HBx can cause tumorigenicity in an HBx transgenic mouse model (Newell et al., 2008). Moreover, HBx expression has been reported to contribute to HCC development by affecting LR (Hodgson et al., 2008); however, the detailed mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we hypothesize that LR after PH may accelerate the precursor neoplastic lesions to progress to HCC, leading to the de novo HCC recurrence. To confirm this hypothesis, an HBx transgenic mouse model was established and PH was performed. Western blotting was carried out to measure the expression profiles of a number of LR‐related SOCS family proteins, growth factors, and transcription factors in the remnant livers at various time points following PH. By comparative analysis of the data between PH and non‐PH groups of mice, our results may provide the potential mechanism for the high de novo recurrence of HCC after PH. Intervention in the interaction of LR‐related factors with viral oncoproteins would be considered to improve the prognosis of HCC treatment by PH surgery.

Material and methods

Transgenic mice and partial hepatectomy

The transgenic mice overexpressing HBx in liver were established by Professor Ting‐Fen Tsai's laboratory (Wu et al., 2006). Briefly, the HBx transgenic mice were generated in the C57BL/6 background and the HBx transgene was driven by the liver‐specific albumin promoter. All the animal experiments were performed under the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the National Cheng Kung University and the National Health Research Institutes. PH was performed according to previously described protocols (Mitchell and Willenbring, 2008). In brief, 3‐month‐old HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice were subjected to PH. During PH, the median and left lateral lobes of livers of mice were removed. After PH, mice were followed up and sacrificed to harvest the remnant livers for biochemical and histological analyses at various time points (4 h, 12 h, 3 days, 10 days, 3 months) until tumor formation (Fig. 1A). Upon tumor formation in HBx transgenic mice, age‐matched non‐transgenic mice were also sacrificed for analysis. The time point during PH was set as 0 h and the surgically removed livers were taken to provide information on the initial status of mice and serve as a control after PH. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level was measured by FUJIFILM DR‐CHEM slides using FUJIFILM DR‐CHEM 3500 machine (FUJIFILM Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Figure 1

PH‐accelerated tumor development in HBx transgenic mice. (A) Schematic overview of the experimental design of PH in HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic (normal) mice. PH was performed in 3‐month‐old HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice. After PH, samples for analyses of liver‐to‐bodyweight (Liver/BW) ratio (B) and serum ALT level (C) were harvested at 0 h, 4 h, 12 h, 3 days, 10 days, and 3 months until tumor formation in HBx transgenic and age‐matched non‐transgenic mice. Three mice were assayed at the time points of 0 h, 4 h, 12 h, 3 days, 10 days, and 3 months, and six mice were assayed when a tumor developed after PH. The various time points after PH are shown in blue. (D) Statistical comparison of the age of tumor formation between PH (n = 8) and non‐PH (n = 21) groups of HBx transgenic mice showed that PH significantly accelerated tumor formation from the mean age of 16.9 to 10.4 months. Statistically significant difference was indicated (*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001).

PH‐accelerated tumor development in HBx transgenic mice. (A) Schematic overview of the experimental design of PH in HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic (normal) mice. PH was performed in 3‐month‐old HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice. After PH, samples for analyses of liver‐to‐bodyweight (Liver/BW) ratio (B) and serum ALT level (C) were harvested at 0 h, 4 h, 12 h, 3 days, 10 days, and 3 months until tumor formation in HBx transgenic and age‐matched non‐transgenic mice. Three mice were assayed at the time points of 0 h, 4 h, 12 h, 3 days, 10 days, and 3 months, and six mice were assayed when a tumor developed after PH. The various time points after PH are shown in blue. (D) Statistical comparison of the age of tumor formation between PH (n = 8) and non‐PH (n = 21) groups of HBx transgenic mice showed that PH significantly accelerated tumor formation from the mean age of 16.9 to 10.4 months. Statistically significant difference was indicated (*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001).

Western blot analysis

As PH was carried out in 3‐month‐old mice, 3‐month‐old non‐PH mice were selected for age‐matched comparison with the mice at the time points of 0 h, 4 h, 12 h, 3 days, and 10 days after PH, and 6‐month‐old non‐PH mice were selected for age‐matched comparison with the mice at 3M after PH. Because the HBx transgenic mice receiving PH developed tumors at the mean age of 10.4 months (range 8.5–13.0; Fig. 1D), we chose 12‐month‐old non‐PH mice for age‐matched comparison with the mice at the time point of tumor formation following PH. Western blot analysis was performed as previously described (Teng et al., 2011). Briefly, total proteins in mice liver tissues were extracted with lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Equal amounts of proteins for each sample were resolved on sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies, followed by secondary antibodies, and then developed by an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Amersham, UK). The primary antibodies used in this study were anti‐SOCS1 (ab83493), anti‐SOCS5 (ab56649), anti‐SOCS6 (ab157168), anti‐Smad2 (ab33875), anti‐p‐Smad2 (Ser467) (ab53100), anti‐Smad3 (ab28379), anti‐HGF (ab83760), anti‐Myc (ab32072; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti‐SOCS3 (2932), anti‐STAT3 (9139), anti‐p‐STAT3 (Tyr705) (9145), anti‐p‐STAT3 (Ser727) (9134), anti‐TGF‐β (3711), anti‐p‐Smad3 (Ser423/425) (9520; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti‐SOCS2 (sc‐9022), anti‐SOCS7 (sc‐5609), anti‐PGC1‐α (SC‐13067), anti‐Smad4 (sc‐7966), anti‐VEGF‐A (sc‐152; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti‐SOCS4 (MAB5628; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti‐β‐Catenin (610153; BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA), and anti‐β‐Actin (MAB1501; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). β‐Actin was used as the internal control.

Statistical analysis

The significance of the age of tumor development between PH and non‐PH groups of HBx transgenic mice was determined by unpaired t‐test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). The significance of protein expression of each LR‐related factor between HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice with or without PH was determined by unpaired t‐test. Data represent the mean with standard deviation (SD) error bar. By comparative analysis of the expression data between PH and non‐PH groups of mice, the LR‐related factors whose expression was significantly changed and strictly related to PH in the HBx transgenic mice were identified.

Data accessibility

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Results

The incidence and mean age of HCC formation in HBx transgenic mice

To verify the role of HBx in tumorigenesis, we first investigated the incidence and mean age of HCC formation in HBx transgenic mice. As shown in Table 1, the HBx transgenic mice developed HCC with a 100% incidence in livers of both males (n = 20) and females (n = 18). None of non‐transgenic mice was observed to develop tumor. The tumor development of HBx transgenic mice was faster in males (mean age 16.9 months; range 14.0–21.5 months) than in females (mean age 21.2 months; range 14.0–27.0 months; P < 0.05). Therefore, we chose male HBx transgenic mice to perform PH for further experiments. The HBx transgenic mice receiving PH were used as a model to mimic the progression of HCC recurrence after PH.
Table 1

The incidence and mean age of HCC formation in HBx transgenic mice

Transgenic miceGenderNumber of mice studiedNumber of mice with tumorTumor incidenceMean age of tumor formation, months
HBxMale2020100%16.9
Female1818100%21.2
The incidence and mean age of HCC formation in HBx transgenic mice

PH‐accelerated tumor development in HBx transgenic mice

To examine the effect of PH on HBx‐mediated tumorigenesis, the liver‐to‐bodyweight ratio as well as serum ALT level of both HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice were recorded at various time points until tumor formation after PH. As shown in Fig. 1B, the ratio of liver‐to‐bodyweight showed no significant difference between HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice within 3 months after PH but it was significantly increased in HBx transgenic mice compared with non‐transgenic mice upon tumor formation after PH. Serum ALT level was significantly elevated in HBx transgenic mice compared with non‐transgenic mice at 10 days and tumor formation after PH (Fig. 1C). Interestingly, we observed that the mean age of tumor formation in HBx transgenic mice after PH was significantly accelerated from 16.9 months (range 14.0–21.5) in the non‐PH group (n = 21) to 10.4 months (range 8.5–13.0) in the PH group (n = 8; Fig. 1D). None of non‐transgenic mice developed tumor during the study period after PH. The results of our animal experiments suggest that hepatocarcinogenesis was accelerated in HBx transgenic mice after PH.

Dynamic expression of LR‐related SOCS family proteins in the progression of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis after PH

To investigate the molecular basis of the acceleration of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis after PH, the protein expression level of SOCS family members (SOCS1–7) in livers at various time points until tumor formation after PH was examined by western blot analysis in both HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice (Fig. S1). For comparative analysis, the expression of SOCS family proteins was also detected in the age‐matched HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice without PH (Fig. S1). As shown in Fig. 2, SOCS1 expression was significantly downregulated in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers at 12 h post‐PH rather than in the age‐matched 3‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers. Conversely, although SOCS1 expression was significantly downregulated in 12‐month‐old non‐PH HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers, no significant difference of SOCS1 expression was observed between transgenic and non‐transgenic livers at the time point of tumor formation after PH. Compared with non‐transgenic livers, SOCS2 expression was significantly downregulated in 3‐month‐old non‐PH HBx transgenic livers but not in the transgenic livers at the time points within 10 days after PH. Conversely, SOCS2 expression showed consistent downregulation in HBx transgenic tumors post‐PH as well as in the age‐matched 12‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers. The expression of SOCS3 was significantly downregulated in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers at the relatively early time points of 4 h, 12 h, and 3 days after PH rather than the age‐matched 3‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers. Conversely, SOCS3 expression was significantly downregulated in 12‐month‐old non‐PH HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers but not in the transgenic livers at the time point of tumor formation after PH. The expression of SOCS4 was significantly increased in HBx transgenic livers at 3 days post‐PH rather than in the age‐matched 3‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers. However, no significant difference in SOCS4 expression was observed between HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic livers at the time point of tumor formation post‐PH, although SOCS4 expression was significantly downregulated in the age‐matched 12‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers. SOCS5 expression was significantly downregulated in 12‐month‐old non‐PH HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers but not in the transgenic livers at the time point of tumor formation after PH. No significant difference in SOCS6 expression was observed between HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic livers with or without PH during the study periods. Compared with non‐transgenic livers, SOCS7 expression was significantly downregulated in HBx transgenic livers at the early time points of 4 and 12 h and the late time point of 3 months as well as in transgenic tumors after PH. However, SOCS7 expression was significantly upregulated in 6‐month‐old and downregulated in 12‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers.
Figure 2

Dynamic expression of LR‐related SOCS family proteins in the progression of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis after PH. The expression of SOCS family proteins in livers of HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice with or without PH was examined by western blotting at the indicated time points, followed by quantitative and statistical analysis (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). The expression of each SOCS protein in HBx transgenic livers, non‐tumors (NT) or tumors (T) was correlated with that in non‐transgenic (normal) livers. The expression changes of each SOCS protein in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers between PH and non‐PH groups of mice are highlighted with the colored boxes corresponding to the age‐matched comparison (blue boxes for PH mice at 0 h, 4 h, 12 h, 3 days, 10 days post‐PH and 3‐month‐old non‐PH mice; green boxes for PH mice at 3 months post‐PH and 6‐month‐old non‐PH mice; magenta boxes for PH mice with tumors and 12‐month‐old non‐PH mice). The upward and downward arrows above each box indicate increased and decreased expression changes in the PH group compared with the non‐PH group of mice, respectively. The number of mice assayed in each group at each time point is shown in Figs S1 and S2.

Dynamic expression of LR‐related SOCS family proteins in the progression of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis after PH. The expression of SOCS family proteins in livers of HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice with or without PH was examined by western blotting at the indicated time points, followed by quantitative and statistical analysis (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). The expression of each SOCS protein in HBx transgenic livers, non‐tumors (NT) or tumors (T) was correlated with that in non‐transgenic (normal) livers. The expression changes of each SOCS protein in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers between PH and non‐PH groups of mice are highlighted with the colored boxes corresponding to the age‐matched comparison (blue boxes for PH mice at 0 h, 4 h, 12 h, 3 days, 10 days post‐PH and 3‐month‐old non‐PH mice; green boxes for PH mice at 3 months post‐PH and 6‐month‐old non‐PH mice; magenta boxes for PH mice with tumors and 12‐month‐old non‐PH mice). The upward and downward arrows above each box indicate increased and decreased expression changes in the PH group compared with the non‐PH group of mice, respectively. The number of mice assayed in each group at each time point is shown in Figs S1 and S2.

Dynamic expression of LR‐related growth and transcription factors in the progression of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis after PH

Next, we examined the protein expression profiles of several growth and transcription factors, including the TGF‐β/Smad pathway, VEGF‐A, HGF, Myc, PGC1‐α, STAT3, and β‐Catenin in livers of HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice with or without PH by western blot analysis (Figs S2 and S3). As shown in Fig. 3, compared with non‐transgenic livers, TGF‐β expression was significantly upregulated in transgenic tumors after PH, although its expression was significantly downregulated in 3‐month‐old and 6‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers. Smad2 expression was significantly downregulated in HBx transgenic livers at 0 h but upregulated in transgenic tumors after PH compared with the non‐PH transgenic livers. The expression of Ser467‐phosphorylated Smad2 was significantly downregulated in HBxtransgenic livers rather than in the non‐PH transgenic livers, compared with non‐transgenic livers at 12 h and 3 months post‐PH, although its expression was significantly downregulated and upregulated in the age‐matched 3‐ and 6‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers, respectively. Smad3 expression was significantly downregulated in HBx transgenic livers at 3 months post‐PH but not in the non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers. The expression of Ser423/425‐phosphorylated Smad3 was significantly upregulated in HBx transgenic livers at 3 days as well as in transgenic non‐tumors and tumors after PH rather than in the non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers. Smad4 expression was significantly upregulated in HBx transgenic livers at 12 h and 3 months post‐PH but not in the non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers.
Figure 3

Dynamic expression of LR‐related TGF‐β/Smad pathway in the progression of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis after PH. The expression of TGF‐β and its downstream Smad proteins was examined by western blotting at the indicated time points, followed by quantitative and statistical analysis (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). The expression of each signal molecule in HBx transgenic livers, non‐tumors (NT) or tumors (T) correlated with that in non‐transgenic (normal) livers. The expression changes of each signal molecule in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers between PH and non‐PH groups of mice are highlighted, with the colored boxes corresponding to the age‐matched comparison as shown in Fig. 2. The upward and downward arrows above each box indicate the increased and decreased expression changes in the PH group compared with the non‐PH group of mice, respectively. The number of mice assayed in each group at each time point is shown in Figs S1 and S3.

Dynamic expression of LR‐related TGF‐β/Smad pathway in the progression of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis after PH. The expression of TGF‐β and its downstream Smad proteins was examined by western blotting at the indicated time points, followed by quantitative and statistical analysis (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). The expression of each signal molecule in HBx transgenic livers, non‐tumors (NT) or tumors (T) correlated with that in non‐transgenic (normal) livers. The expression changes of each signal molecule in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers between PH and non‐PH groups of mice are highlighted, with the colored boxes corresponding to the age‐matched comparison as shown in Fig. 2. The upward and downward arrows above each box indicate the increased and decreased expression changes in the PH group compared with the non‐PH group of mice, respectively. The number of mice assayed in each group at each time point is shown in Figs S1 and S3. As shown in Fig. 4, compared with non‐transgenic livers, VEGF‐A expression was significantly downregulated in HBx transgenic livers at 6 months and in transgenic tumors after PH rather than the age‐matched transgenic livers. HGF expression was significantly upregulated in HBx transgenic livers at 3 days but downregulated in transgenic tumors after PH, although its expression was significantly downregulated in 3‐ and 6‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers. Myc expression was significantly upregulated in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers at 12 h and 3 months post‐PH but not in the age‐matched non‐PH transgenic livers. PGC1‐α expression was significantly downregulated in HBx transgenic livers at 0 h and 3 months post‐PH but not in the age‐matched non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers. STAT3 expression was significantly upregulated in HBx transgenic livers at 4 h post‐PH but downregulated in 3‐ and 6‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers. The expression of Tyr705‐phosphorylated STAT3 showed no significant difference between HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic livers at any of the examined time points after PH but it was upregulated in 12‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers. The expression of Ser727‐phosphorylated STAT3 was significantly downregulated in HBx transgenic livers at 12 h post‐PH as well as in the age‐matched 3‐month‐old non‐PH transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers. Compared with non‐transgenic livers, β‐Catenin expression was significantly upregulated in HBx transgenic livers at 0 h but downregulated in transgenic livers at 12 h and in transgenic non‐tumors after PH. However, no significant difference of β‐Catenin expression was observed between HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic livers in the non‐PH mice.
Figure 4

Dynamic expression of LR‐related growth and transcription factors in the progression of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis after PH. The expression of several LR‐related growth and transcription factors was examined by western blotting at the indicated time points, followed by quantitative and statistical analysis (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). The expression of each LR‐related factor in HBx transgenic livers, non‐tumors (NT) or tumors (T) correlated with that in non‐transgenic (normal) livers. The expression changes of each LR‐related factor in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers between the PH and non‐PH groups of mice are highlighted, with the colored boxes corresponding to the age‐matched comparison as shown in Fig. 2. The upward and downward arrows above each box indicate the increased and decreased expression changes in PH group compared with non‐PH group of mice, respectively. The number of mice assayed in each group at each time point is shown in Figs S1 and S3.

Dynamic expression of LR‐related growth and transcription factors in the progression of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis after PH. The expression of several LR‐related growth and transcription factors was examined by western blotting at the indicated time points, followed by quantitative and statistical analysis (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). The expression of each LR‐related factor in HBx transgenic livers, non‐tumors (NT) or tumors (T) correlated with that in non‐transgenic (normal) livers. The expression changes of each LR‐related factor in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers between the PH and non‐PH groups of mice are highlighted, with the colored boxes corresponding to the age‐matched comparison as shown in Fig. 2. The upward and downward arrows above each box indicate the increased and decreased expression changes in PH group compared with non‐PH group of mice, respectively. The number of mice assayed in each group at each time point is shown in Figs S1 and S3.

Discussion

Liver has the remarkable capacity to regenerate after surgical removal or injury. The unique regenerative property of liver constitutes a dilemma in surgical treatment of HCC, considering the potential role of PH‐induced LR in the acceleration of tumorigenesis in the remnant liver, which harbors precancerous lesions such as HBV infection. In this study, we used HBx transgenic mice to mimic the surgical resection of HBV‐related HCC patients. This HBx transgenic mouse model provides a more natural course of tumor development in chronic HBV infection. Previous studies were usually performed on normal rodents either receiving transplanted tumor cells or using chemicals to induce tumor development (de Jong et al., 1995; Picardo et al., 1998). Using this model, we observed that the mean age of tumor formation in HBx transgenic livers was accelerated from 16.9 to 10.4 months after PH, implying that PH‐induced LR may accelerate the progression of HBx‐induced tumorigenesis, a condition mimicking the observation of de novo recurrence of HBV‐related HCC after surgical resection. Our results may provide an explanation for the high de novo recurrence of HBV‐related HCC after PH, probably through induction of the sequential changes of LR‐related SOCS family proteins, growth factors, and transcription factors, which promote growth on the precancerous remnant liver (Fig. 5; Chok et al., 2011; Iizuka et al., 2003; Sonnenblick and Zahavi, 2017).
Figure 5

Proposed schematic model for the role of PH‐induced LR in the acceleration of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis. In the HBx transgenic mouse model receiving PH, the expression level of several LR‐related genes, whose protein products exhibit either suppressive or promotive effect on LR, is either downregulated (downward arrows) or upregulated (upward arrows) in the remnant livers from the early time points (0 h, 4 h, 12 h, 3 days, and 10 days; blue‐colored) to the late time point (3 months; green‐colored) until tumor formation (magenta‐colored) after PH in comparison with the non‐PH mice. The combined effect of downregulation of the indicated suppressive molecules and upregulation of the indicated promotive molecules at the indicated stages following PH may induce a LR‐initiated growth promotion on the remnant livers, contributing to the acceleration of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis.

Proposed schematic model for the role of PH‐induced LR in the acceleration of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis. In the HBx transgenic mouse model receiving PH, the expression level of several LR‐related genes, whose protein products exhibit either suppressive or promotive effect on LR, is either downregulated (downward arrows) or upregulated (upward arrows) in the remnant livers from the early time points (0 h, 4 h, 12 h, 3 days, and 10 days; blue‐colored) to the late time point (3 months; green‐colored) until tumor formation (magenta‐colored) after PH in comparison with the non‐PH mice. The combined effect of downregulation of the indicated suppressive molecules and upregulation of the indicated promotive molecules at the indicated stages following PH may induce a LR‐initiated growth promotion on the remnant livers, contributing to the acceleration of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis. Activation of LR after PH has been reported to be mediated by some important clusters of networks: cytokines, metabolic signals, and tight regulation of growth factors and its receptors (Kurinna and Barton, 2011). However, the mechanism of LR in de novo HCC recurrence after PH is still poorly understood and the prediction biomarkers are not well defined. In this study, the results revealed that the dysregulation of LR‐related SOCS family proteins may play one role. The expression of three SOCS proteins (SOCS1, SOCS3, and SOCS7) was remarkably downregulated in livers of HBx transgenic mice compared with non‐transgenic mice from the early time points (4 h, 12 h, and 3 days) to the late time points (3 months) after PH in comparison with the age‐matched non‐PH mice. This result is consistent with the anti‐tumor role of SOCS family proteins in LR after PH. By acting on cytokines and growth factors that promote hepatocyte proliferation, mice deficient in either SOCS1 or SOCS3 were shown to exhibit an accelerated rate of LR after PH (Gui et al., 2011; Riehle et al., 2008). In addition, SOCS1 and SOCS3 have been implicated in HCC (Niwa et al., 2005; Yoshida et al., 2004; Yoshikawa et al., 2001). The gene loss and epigenetic silencing of SOCS1 and SOCS3 frequently occurred in HBV‐related HCC patients (Niwa et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2014). Moreover, one recent study reported that HBx could downregulate the expression of SOCS1 through enhancing the methylation of SOCS1 gene promoter (Fu et al., 2016). The biological function of SOCS7 protein remains to be determined. Considering that SOCS family proteins function as a terminator of LR, the suppression of SOCS1, SOCS3, and SOCS7 expression in remnant livers may be involved in the accelerated tumor development in HBx transgenic mice after PH. Besides SOCS family proteins, in this study we examined the expression of LR‐related TGF‐β and its downstream Smad proteins. The TGF‐β/Smad pathway plays essential roles in regulation of a wide variety of cellular functions, including proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis (Drabsch and ten Dijke, 2012). Several studies have suggested that dysregulation of this pathway contributes to all stages of liver disease progression, from initial liver injury through inflammation and fibrosis to cirrhosis and HCC (Fabregat et al., 2016; Giannelli et al., 2014; Meindl‐Beinker et al., 2012). Consistent with these findings, our results showed that the expression of TGF‐β, Smad2, Ser423/425‐phosphorylated Smad3, and Smad4 was remarkably increased in livers of HBx transgenic mice compared with non‐transgenic mice from the early time points (4 h, 12 h, 3 days, and 10 days) to the late time points (3 months) even up to tumor formation after PH in comparison with the age‐matched non‐PH mice. The sustained activation of the TGF‐β/Smad pathway during the entire period following PH implies that HBx may affect the TGF‐β/Smad pathway, leading to tumor progression. In this study, several LR‐related growth and transcription factors were also investigated. HGF, Myc, and β‐Catenin are important for efficient LR through driving cell cycle progression and cell proliferation after PH (Fausto et al., 2006; Kurinna and Barton, 2011; Monga et al., 2001; Sanders et al., 2012). Consistently, our results revealed that the expression of HGF, Myc, and β‐Catenin was significantly upregulated in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic mice at both the early (0 h, 12 h, and 3 days) and late (3 months) time points after PH in comparison with the age‐matched non‐PH mice, implying that HBx may enhance the progression of HCC after PH by positively regulating these signal molecules. STAT3 is rapidly induced in livers in the first few hours after PH and is required for the transcriptional activation of many immediate/early growth response genes (Cressman et al., 1995; Moh et al., 2007). In addition, STAT3 has been reported to act as an oncogenic factor to promote tumor growth in liver tumorigenesis (Wang et al., 2011). Consistent with these reports, our data also showed that the expression of STAT3 was significantly upregulated in HBx transgenic livers compared with non‐transgenic livers at both the early (4 h) and late (3 months) time points after PH in comparison with the age‐matched non‐PH mice, suggesting that STAT3 may function as a transcriptional activator at the early stage and an oncogenic factor at the late stage of HBx transgenic tumorigenesis after PH.

Conclusions

In this study we demonstrated that use of PH as a curative therapeutic treatment in the HBx transgenic mice could accelerate tumor development, an outcome which is similarly observed in clinical practice. Until now, PH has been a potentially curative procedure for the treatment of HCC. Although diagnostic methods and therapeutic strategies for HCC have been improved in the past decade, the survival and postsurgical recurrence rates are still high. The HBV‐infected hepatocyte seems to become a pre‐existing precancerous lesion that can disrupt the critical regulators (such as SOCSs, TGF‐β/Smad, HGF, Myc, STAT3, and β‐Catenin) in both physiological and tumorigenic processes. The underlying mechanisms by which PH activates hepatocyte pre‐existing precancerous lesions and leads to the enhanced HBx tumorigenesis still need further investigation. Based on our results, the acceleration of the recurrence of HBV‐infected HCC after PH should be carefully verified, and markers for HCC recurrence could be examined in post‐PH surgical specimens to predict the recurrence, which also provides a benefit for HCC patients from the use of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for HBV‐infected HCC after PH.

Author contributions

CF performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. HY assisted in analyzing the data and writing the manuscript. WC assisted in performing the experiments and analyzing the data. HW assisted in analyzing the data. YH assisted in performing the experiments. IJ and YJ designed the study and composed the manuscript. Fig. S1. Western blotting of LR‐related SOCS family proteins in livers of HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice with or without PH. Click here for additional data file. Fig. S2. Western blotting of LR‐related TGF‐β/Smad pathway in livers of HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice with or without PH. Click here for additional data file. Fig. S3. Western blotting of LR‐related growth and transcription factors in HBx transgenic and non‐transgenic mice with or without PH. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  45 in total

1.  SOCS-1, a negative regulator of the JAK/STAT pathway, is silenced by methylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma and shows growth-suppression activity.

Authors:  H Yoshikawa; K Matsubara; G S Qian; P Jackson; J D Groopman; J E Manning; C C Harris; J G Herman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  TGF-β signalling and its role in cancer progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Yvette Drabsch; Peter ten Dijke
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.264

3.  Improved results of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis give the procedure added value.

Authors:  G L Grazi; G Ercolani; F Pierangeli; M Del Gaudio; M Cescon; A Cavallari; A Mazziotti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Blocking of G1/S transition and cell death in the regenerating liver of Hepatitis B virus X protein transgenic mice.

Authors:  Bo-Kuan Wu; Chao-Chin Li; Huei-Jane Chen; Junn-Liang Chang; King-Song Jeng; Chen-Kung Chou; Ming-Ta Hsu; Ting-Fen Tsai
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Cascades of transcription regulation during liver regeneration.

Authors:  Svitlana Kurinna; Michelle Craig Barton
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 5.085

6.  Accelerated carcinogenesis following liver resection in chronically inflamed livers: A window of opportunity for treatment.

Authors:  Amir Sonnenblick; Tamar Zahavi
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-03-30

Review 7.  Moving towards personalised therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of the microenvironment.

Authors:  Gianluigi Giannelli; Bhavna Rani; Francesco Dituri; Yuan Cao; Giuseppe Palasciano
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  TGF-β signalling and liver disease.

Authors:  Isabel Fabregat; Joaquim Moreno-Càceres; Aránzazu Sánchez; Steven Dooley; Bedair Dewidar; Gianluigi Giannelli; Peter Ten Dijke
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.542

9.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management and future development-improved outcomes with surgical resection.

Authors:  Yoji Kishi; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Int J Hepatol       Date:  2011-06-23

10.  SOCS1 is a suppressor of liver fibrosis and hepatitis-induced carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Takafumi Yoshida; Hisanobu Ogata; Masaki Kamio; Akiko Joo; Hiroshi Shiraishi; Yoko Tokunaga; Michio Sata; Hisaki Nagai; Akihiko Yoshimura
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  5 in total

1.  A Herpes Simplex Virus Thymidine Kinase-Induced Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Up-Regulated Immune-Inflammatory-Related Signals.

Authors:  Zhijuan Gong; Qingwen Ma; Xujun Wang; Qin Cai; Xiuli Gong; Georgi Z Genchev; Hui Lu; Fanyi Zeng
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  TGF-β1 accelerates the hepatitis B virus X-induced malignant transformation of hepatic progenitor cells by upregulating miR-199a-3p.

Authors:  Ke-Shuai Dong; Yan Chen; Guang Yang; Zhi-Bin Liao; Hong-Wei Zhang; Hui-Fang Liang; Xiao-Ping Chen; Han-Hua Dong
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 3.  The role of SOCS proteins in the development of virus- induced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinyan Xie; Mingshu Wang; Anchun Cheng; Renyong Jia; Dekang Zhu; Mafeng Liu; Shun Chen; XinXin Zhao; Qiao Yang; Ying Wu; Shaqiu Zhang; Qihui Luo; Yin Wang; Zhiwen Xu; Zhengli Chen; Ling Zhu; Yunya Liu; Yanling Yu; Ling Zhang; Xiaoyue Chen
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 4.  Dysregulation of Liver Regeneration by Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Impact on Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Eun-Sook Park; Mehrangiz Dezhbord; Ah Ram Lee; Bo Bae Park; Kyun-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Hepatocarcinoma Induces a Tumor Necrosis Factor-Dependent Kupffer Cell Death Pathway That Favors Its Proliferation Upon Partial Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Jean-François Hastir; Sandrine Delbauve; Lionel Larbanoix; Desislava Germanova; Cleo Goyvaerts; Justine Allard; Sophie Laurent; Karine Breckpot; Alain Beschin; Martin Guilliams; Véronique Flamand
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.