Literature DB >> 29728841

Clinicians' perceptions of medication errors with opioids in cancer and palliative care services: a priority setting report.

N Heneka1, T Shaw2, C Azzi3,4, J L Phillips3,5.   

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a priority setting process, undertaken with cancer and palliative care clinicians, to better understand the characteristics of medication errors with opioids within their services. Participants representing six public hospitals in one Australian state took part in a series of priority setting workshops and, drawing on actual incidents occurring in their services, sought to identify where in the opioid medication process errors were most frequently occurring. Opioid error types and perceived contributing factors were explored, and strategies to reduce/prevent opioid errors were proposed. The priority setting process provided valuable insights into the types of opioid errors that occur in cancer and palliative care services and the complexity of addressing opioid errors from the clinician's perspective. The findings from this priority setting process will inform future targeted quality improvement initiatives to support safe opioid medication practices in cancer and palliative care services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesics, opioid; Cancer care; Medication errors; Palliative care; Patient safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29728841     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4231-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  7 in total

1.  Variation in medication use in cancer patients at the end of life: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  N J H Raijmakers; L van Zuylen; C J Furst; M Beccaro; L Maiorana; P Pilastri; C Rossi; G Flego; A van der Heide; M Costantini
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Quantifying the burden of opioid medication errors in adult oncology and palliative care settings: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole Heneka; Tim Shaw; Debra Rowett; Jane L Phillips
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  Can A Complex Online Intervention Improve Cancer Nurses' Pain Screening and Assessment Practices? Results from a Multicenter, Pre-post Test Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jane L Phillips; Nicole Heneka; Louise Hickman; Lawrence Lam; Tim Shaw
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.929

4.  Patients with eventually fatal chronic illness: their importance within a national research agenda on improving patient safety and reducing medical errors.

Authors:  S S Myers; J Lynn
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Prescribing in palliative care as death approaches.

Authors:  David C Currow; James P Stevenson; Amy P Abernethy; John Plummer; Tania M Shelby-James
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Medication reconciliation in hospice: a pilot study.

Authors:  Leonette O Kemp; Priyanka Narula; Mary Lynn McPherson; Ilene Zuckerman
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting.

Authors:  Shannon L Sibbald; Peter A Singer; Ross Upshur; Douglas K Martin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.