Literature DB >> 28363326

Can A Complex Online Intervention Improve Cancer Nurses' Pain Screening and Assessment Practices? Results from a Multicenter, Pre-post Test Pilot Study.

Jane L Phillips1, Nicole Heneka2, Louise Hickman2, Lawrence Lam2, Tim Shaw2.   

Abstract

Unrelieved cancer pain has an adverse impact on quality of life. While routine screening and assessment forms the basis of effective cancer pain management, it is often poorly done, thus contributing to the burden of unrelieved cancer pain. The aim of this study was to test the impact of an online, complex, evidence-based educational intervention on cancer nurses' pain assessment capabilities and adherence to cancer pain screening and assessment guidelines. Specialist inpatient cancer nurses in five Australian acute care settings participated in an intervention combining an online spaced learning cancer pain assessment module with audit and feedback of pain assessment practices. Participants' self-perceived pain assessment competencies were measured at three time points. Prospective, consecutive chart audits were undertaken to appraise nurses' adherence with pain screening and assessment guidelines. The differences in documented pre-post pain assessment practices were benchmarked and fed back to all sites post intervention. Data were analyzed using inferential statistics. Participants who completed the intervention (n = 44) increased their pain assessment knowledge, assessment tool knowledge, and confidence undertaking a pain assessment (p < .001). The positive changes in nurses' pain assessment capabilities translated into a significant increasing linear trend in the proportion of documented pain assessments in patients' charts at the three time points (χ2 trend = 18.28, df = 1, p < .001). There is evidence that learning content delivered using a spaced learning format, augmented with pain assessment audit and feedback data, improves inpatient cancer nurses' self-perceived pain screening and assessment capabilities and strengthens cancer pain guideline adherence.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28363326     DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2017.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs        ISSN: 1524-9042            Impact factor:   1.929


  6 in total

1.  Clinicians' perceptions of medication errors with opioids in cancer and palliative care services: a priority setting report.

Authors:  N Heneka; T Shaw; C Azzi; J L Phillips
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Pilot study to explore the use of mobile spaced learning as a digital learning platform when teaching symptom management to undergraduate nursing students: SPLENdidS study.

Authors:  Clare Mc Veigh; Susan Carlisle; Matt Birch; Lindsay Ace; Christine Oliver; Helen Kerr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies on health care professionals' behaviour and patient outcomes in the cancer care context: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer R Tomasone; Kaitlyn D Kauffeldt; Rushil Chaudhary; Melissa C Brouwers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Complementary and Alternative Medicine Online Learning Intervention for Oncology Healthcare Providers: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Mohamad Baydoun; Gregory Levin; Lynda G Balneaves; Devesh Oberoi; Aven Sidhu; Linda E Carlson
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.279

5.  Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial.

Authors:  Tim Luckett; Jane Phillips; Meera Agar; Lawrence Lam; Patricia M Davidson; Nicola McCaffrey; Frances Boyle; Tim Shaw; David C Currow; Alison Read; Annmarie Hosie; Melanie Lovell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Conceptualising spaced learning in health professions education: A scoping review.

Authors:  Marjolein Versteeg; Renée A Hendriks; Aliki Thomas; Belinda W C Ommering; Paul Steendijk
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 6.251

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.