Literature DB >> 2972848

Immediate vs delayed catheterization and angioplasty following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. TIMI II A results. The TIMI Research Group.

.   

Abstract

The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction II A Study investigated whether immediate cardiac catheterization with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), when appropriate, would confer an advantage over the same procedures performed 18 to 48 hours later. All patients were treated with intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator within four hours of the onset of acute myocardial infarction. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the infarct-related artery was attempted in 72% of the 195 patients assigned to immediate PTCA; 84% of the attempts were judged to have shown improvement. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was attempted in 55% of the 194 patients assigned to 18- to 48-hour PTCA; 93% of the attempts were judged to have shown improvement. No differences between the two PTCA groups were observed for ejection fraction (primary end point), measured by contrast ventriculography predischarge (50.3% in the immediate and 49.0% in the delayed PTCA groups). Immediate catheterization/angioplasty was associated with increased frequency of bleeding and coronary artery bypass surgery. These findings indicate that immediate performance of coronary arteriography and PTCA compared with delaying these procedures for 18 to 48 hours provides no advantage and may be harmful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2972848     DOI: 10.1001/jama.1988.03410190097031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  24 in total

1.  The Open Artery Hypothesis: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  M Goel; J T Dodge; M Rizzo; C McLean; K A Ryan; W L Daley; C P Cannon; C M Gibson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  The role of coronary angioplasty and stenting in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A Brodison; R S More; A Chauhan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Treating myocardial infarction in the post-GUSTO era. A European perspective.

Authors:  M J de Boer; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Transport and centralization of acute coronary syndrome care.

Authors:  James L Orford; Peter B Berger
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  French multicenter trial of anistreplase versus heparin in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Lardoux; Y Louvard; D de Vernejoul; C Picot; M Baudet; M Hiltgen; M Houplon; J Ponsonnaille; M Richard; R Luccioni
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Invasive Strategies to Achieve Infarct-Related Artery Patency.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Clinical Utility of Electrocardiographic ST-Segment Area for Predicting Unsatisfactory Outcomes Following Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  [Acute coronary syndrome: unstable angina and myocardial infarction].

Authors:  M Kelm; B E Strauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 9.  Immediate angioplasty after thrombolysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Warren J Cantor; Fabrice Brunet; Carolyn P Ziegler; Alex Kiss; Laurie J Morrison
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Contrast echocardiography accurately predicts myocardial perfusion before angiography during acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gregory B Schnell; Albert J Kryski; Luana Mann; Todd J Anderson; Israel Belenkie
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.