| Literature DB >> 2972784 |
J W Fleshman1, R S McLeod, Z Cohen, H Stern.
Abstract
Between December 1981 and March, 1987, 188 ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedures were performed at the University of Toronto. Anal anastomotic complications occurred in 24 (12.8%) patients. There were 19 patients who developed a leak as a result of non-healing of the ileoanal anastomosis (group 1). Late fistulae occurred in 5 patients (group 2). Various treatments were employed. In group 1, 2 of 15 (13%) patients treated with drainage and antibiotics, 3 of 7 (43%) in whom the anastomosis was resutured, and 5 of 7 (71%) in whom repair was performed by advancing the ileal outlet and resuturing the anastomosis, healed their anastomosis. One patient was treated successfully by performing a fistulotomy. Treatment was unsuccessful in one patient in whom the ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis were revised and re-anastomosed. One patient (50%) in group 2 was treated successfully by advancing the ileal outlet and resuturing the anastomosis. Complete healing of the anastomosis was achieved in 12 patients (50%), although 3 patients subsequently required excision of the reservoir because of inability to evacuate spontaneously (1), incontinence (1), or psychological reasons (1). All nine (38%) patients who were functioning with their ileal reservoir were continent. One patient intubated the reservoir. The rate of urgency and soiling, and the number of bowel movements per 24 hours did not differ significantly from those of patients without these anastomotic complications. Our results suggest that early diagnosis and repair of ileoanal anastomotic dehiscence by advancement of the ileal outlet and resuturing of the ileoanal anastomosis results in improved reservoir salvage and satisfactory functional results.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1988 PMID: 2972784 DOI: 10.1007/bf01648360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis ISSN: 0179-1958 Impact factor: 2.571