Lauren Raine1, Eric Drollette2, Shih-Chun Kao1, Daniel Westfall1, Laura Chaddock-Heyman3, Arthur F Kramer1,3, Naiman Khan4, Charles Hillman1,5. 1. Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 2. Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC. 3. Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. 4. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. 5. Department of Physical Therapy, Movement, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
Abstract
Although obesity has been related to measures of academic achievement and cognition in children, the influence of fat distribution, specifically visceral adiposity, on select aspects of achievement and cognitive function remains poorly characterized among preadolescent children. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation of adiposity, particularly visceral adipose tissue (VAT), on achievement and cognitive function among children. METHODS: Children with obesity (ages 8-9 yr old, N = 55, 35 females) completed cognitive and academic tests. Normal weight children (N = 55, 35 females) were matched to this group on demographic characteristics and aerobic fitness. Covariate analyses included age, Brief Intellectual Ability, socioeconomic status, and fat-free V˙O2 (V˙O2 peak adjusted for lean mass; mL·kg lean·min). Adiposity (i.e., whole body percent fat, subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue, and VAT) was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The results of this study revealed that, relative to their normal weight counterparts, children with obesity had significantly lower performance on tests of reading and math. Analyses revealed that among children with obesity, %Fat and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue were not related to cognitive abilities. However, higher VAT was associated with poorer intellectual abilities (Ps ≤ 0.04) and cognitive performance (i.e., thinking ability and cognitive efficiency, Ps ≤ 0.04). However, among normal weight children, VAT was positively associated with intellectual abilities and cognitive efficiency. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the results suggest that VAT was selectively and negatively related with cognition among children with obesity. Along with the dangerous metabolic nature of VAT, its detrimental relationship with obese children's intellectual and cognitive functioning is concerning.
Although obesity has been related to measures of academic achievement and cognition in children, the influence of fat distribution, specifically visceral adiposity, on select aspects of achievement and cognitive function remains poorly characterized among preadolescent children. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation of adiposity, particularly visceral adipose tissue (VAT), on achievement and cognitive function among children. METHODS:Children with obesity (ages 8-9 yr old, N = 55, 35 females) completed cognitive and academic tests. Normal weight children (N = 55, 35 females) were matched to this group on demographic characteristics and aerobic fitness. Covariate analyses included age, Brief Intellectual Ability, socioeconomic status, and fat-free V˙O2 (V˙O2 peak adjusted for lean mass; mL·kg lean·min). Adiposity (i.e., whole body percent fat, subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue, and VAT) was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The results of this study revealed that, relative to their normal weight counterparts, children with obesity had significantly lower performance on tests of reading and math. Analyses revealed that among children with obesity, %Fat and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue were not related to cognitive abilities. However, higher VAT was associated with poorer intellectual abilities (Ps ≤ 0.04) and cognitive performance (i.e., thinking ability and cognitive efficiency, Ps ≤ 0.04). However, among normal weight children, VAT was positively associated with intellectual abilities and cognitive efficiency. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the results suggest that VAT was selectively and negatively related with cognition among children with obesity. Along with the dangerous metabolic nature of VAT, its detrimental relationship with obesechildren's intellectual and cognitive functioning is concerning.
Authors: Julian N Trollor; Evelyn Smith; Emmeline Agars; Stacey A Kuan; Bernhard T Baune; Lesley Campbell; Katherine Samaras; John Crawford; Ora Lux; Nicole A Kochan; Henry Brodaty; Perminder Sachdev Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2011-08-19
Authors: Keita Kamijo; Naiman A Khan; Matthew B Pontifex; Mark R Scudder; Eric S Drollette; Lauren B Raine; Ellen M Evans; Darla M Castelli; Charles H Hillman Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Lisa K Micklesfield; Julia H Goedecke; Mark Punyanitya; Kevin E Wilson; Thomas L Kelly Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Sultan Ayoub Meo; Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Altuwaym; Rayan Mohammed Alfallaj; Khalid Abdulaziz Alduraibi; Abdullah Mohammed Alhamoudi; Saud Mohammed Alghamdi; Ashfaq Akram Journal: Obes Facts Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 3.942
Authors: Nicole E Logan; Daniel R Westfall; Lauren B Raine; Sheeba A Anteraper; Laura Chaddock-Heyman; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Arthur F Kramer; Charles H Hillman Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Alejandro Arenas-Pinto; Ali Judd; Diane Melvin; Marthe Le Prevost; Caroline Foster; Kate Sturgeon; Alan Winston; Lindsay C Thompson; Diana M Gibb; Hannah Castro Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 3.752