Literature DB >> 29726358

How Advances in Imaging Will Affect Precision Radiation Oncology.

David A Jaffray1, Shiva Das2, Paula M Jacobs3, Robert Jeraj2, Philippe Lambin4.   

Abstract

Radiation oncology is 1 of the most structured disciplines in medicine. It is of a highly technical nature with reliance on robotic systems to deliver intervention, engagement of diverse expertise, and early adoption of digital approaches to optimize and execute the application of this highly effective cancer treatment. As a localized intervention, the dependence on sensitive, specific, and accurate imaging to define the extent of disease, its heterogeneity, and adjacency to normal tissues directly affects the therapeutic ratio. Image-based in vivo temporal monitoring of the response to treatment enables adaptation and further affects the therapeutic ratio. Thus, more precise intervention will enable fractionation schedules that better interoperate with advances such as immunotherapy. In the data set-rich era that promises precision and personalized medicine, the radiation oncology field will integrate these new data into highly protocoled pathways of care that begin with multimodality prediction and enable patient-specific adaptation of therapy based on quantitative measures of the individual's dose-volume temporal trajectory and midtherapy predictions of response. In addition to advancements in computed tomography imaging, emerging technologies, such as ultra-high-field magnetic resonance and molecular imaging will bring new information to the design of treatments. Next-generation image guided radiation therapy systems will inject high specificity and sensitivity data and stimulate adaptive replanning. In addition, a myriad of pre- and peritherapeutic markers derived from advances in molecular pathology (eg, tumor genomics), automated and comprehensive imaging analytics (eg, radiomics, tumor microenvironment), and many other emerging biomarkers (eg, circulating tumor cell assays) will need to be integrated to maximize the benefit of radiation therapy for an individual patient. We present a perspective on the promise and challenges of fully exploiting imaging data in the pursuit of personalized radiation therapy, drawing from the presentations and broader discussions at the 2016 American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology-National Cancer Institute workshop on Precision Medicine in Radiation Oncology (Bethesda, MD).
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29726358     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

Review 1.  High-dimensional role of AI and machine learning in cancer research.

Authors:  Enrico Capobianco
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 9.075

2.  Trends in Physics Contributions to the 'Red Journal': A 30-year Journey and Comparison to Global Trends.

Authors:  Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Nitin Ohri; Wolfgang A Tomé; Shalom Kalnicki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-07-20

3.  Magnetic resonance biomarkers in radiation oncology: The report of AAPM Task Group 294.

Authors:  Kiaran P McGee; Ken-Pin Hwang; Daniel C Sullivan; John Kurhanewicz; Yanle Hu; Jihong Wang; Wen Li; Josef Debbins; Eric Paulson; Jeffrey R Olsen; Chia-Ho Hua; Lizette Warner; Daniel Ma; Eduardo Moros; Neelam Tyagi; Caroline Chung
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Combining imaging- and gene-based hypoxia biomarkers in cervical cancer improves prediction of chemoradiotherapy failure independent of intratumour heterogeneity.

Authors:  Christina S Fjeldbo; Tord Hompland; Tiril Hillestad; Eva-Katrine Aarnes; Clara-Cecilie Günther; Gunnar B Kristensen; Eirik Malinen; Heidi Lyng
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 5.  How rapid advances in imaging are defining the future of precision radiation oncology.

Authors:  Laura Beaton; Steve Bandula; Mark N Gaze; Ricky A Sharma
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Role of Complex Networks for Integrating Medical Images and Radiomic Features of Intracranial Ependymoma Patients in Response to Proton Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marco Dominietto; Alessia Pica; Sairos Safai; Antony J Lomax; Damien C Weber; Enrico Capobianco
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-01-17

Review 7.  Image guidance: past and future of radiotherapy.

Authors:  H Herrmann; Y Seppenwoolde; D Georg; J Widder
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Adapting training for medical physicists to match future trends in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Catharine H Clark; Giovanna Gagliardi; Ben Heijmen; Julian Malicki; Daniela Thorwarth; Dirk Verellen; Ludvig P Muren
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-09-19

Review 9.  Role of noninvasive molecular imaging in determining response.

Authors:  Ariel E Marciscano; Daniel L J Thorek
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-23

Review 10.  Radiomics for radiation oncologists: are we ready to go?

Authors:  Loïg Vaugier; Ludovic Ferrer; Laurence Mengue; Emmanuel Jouglar
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2020-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.