| Literature DB >> 29725211 |
Seung Wook Kim1,2, Coralia V Garcia3, Bom Nae Lee3, Ho Jeong Kwon1, Jun Tae Kim3.
Abstract
In this study, a nanoemulsion formulation for encapsulating turmeric extract was developed and its physicochemical characteristics including particle diameter, zeta potential, polydispersity index, and stability were determined. The turmeric nanoemulsion (TE-NE) droplets exhibited small diameter (165 nm), low PDI (0.17), and high zeta potential (-31.80 mV), all desirable characteristics in nanoemulsions, as well as stability in a wide range of pH. The TE-NE was spray-dried as a means to allow its incorporation into food products and reduce potential transport and storage costs. The resulting powder exhibited a pale yellowish appearance and had a curcuminoids content of 0.39 mg/g. The spray-dried TE-NE powder was incorporated into minced pork to make canned ham, and the sensory characteristics of the ham were evaluated. As a result, the canned ham incorporating TE-NE powder received the same overall acceptability score as the control, and only exhibited slight yellowing. By contrast, ham incorporating turmeric extract exhibited substantial yellowing, and its appearance was considered less acceptable by the panelists. Therefore, the TE-NE formulation could be incorporated into canned ham and other meat products without substantially affecting their sensory qualities.Entities:
Keywords: canned ham; curcuminoids; nanoemulsion; turmeric
Year: 2017 PMID: 29725211 PMCID: PMC5932933 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.6.889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Fig. 1.Solubility of turmeric extract (TE) in different oil types.
Fig. 2.Effect of water content on droplet size (A) and zeta potential (B) of turmeric extract nanoemulsions (TE-NEs) over storage for 30 days.
Fig. 3.Effect of ratio of surfactants on droplet size (A) and zeta potential (B) of TE-NEs.
Fig. 4.Effect of pH on droplet size (A) and zeta potential (B) of TE-NEs formulated with and without WPI.
Fig. 5.TEM images of pristine TE-NEs [(a), (b)] and redispersed TE-NEs powder [(c), (d)].
Canned ham formulation with TE and TE-NE (Unit: %)
| TE | TENE | Salt | Seasonings | Carrageenan | Spice | Sugar | Vitamin C | Water | Pork | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH-Con | - | - | 1.85 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.15 | 1.1 | 0.05 | 4.15 | 92 | 100 |
| CH-TE | 0.3 | - | 1.85 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.15 | 1.1 | 0.05 | 3.85 | 92 | 100 |
| CH-TENE | - | 0.3 | 1.85 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.15 | 1.1 | 0.05 | 3.85 | 92 | 100 |
CH-Con, Control canned ham; CH-TE, Canned ham incorporating turmeric extract; CH-TENE, Canned ham incorporating turmeric extract nanoemulsion.
Fig. 6.Photographs of control canned ham (a), canned ham incorporating TE (b), and canned ham incorporating TE-NE (c).
Color values of canned ham with TE and TE-NE
| L | a | b | ΔE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 58.62±0.02c | 9.42±0.03b | 9.63±0.06a | - |
| CH-TE | 55.43±0.01a | 9.27±0.04a | 13.99±0.05c | 5.4±0.04 |
| CH-TENE | 55.68±0.02b | 11.77±0.02c | 11.01±0.04b | 4.0±0.01 |
*Different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at p<0.05.
Sensory scores of uncooked and cooked canned ham with turmeric extract (TE) and spray-dried turmeric extract nanoemulsion (TE-NE)
| Sample | Uncooked | Cooked | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance (color) | Off-flavor | Overall acceptability | Appearance (color) | Off-flavor | Overall acceptability | |
| Control | 7.82±0.60b | 0.00±0.00a | 7.73±0.65a | 7.93±0.27b | 0.00±0.00a | 7.50±0.76a |
| CH-TE | 6.91±0.70a | 0.09±0.30a | 7.09±0.54a | 6.93±0.73a | 0.09±0.30a | 7.29±0.61a |
| CH-TENE | 7.73±0.79b | 0.09±0.30a | 7.45±0.93a | 7.43±0.51b | 0.00±0.00a | 7.50±0.52a |
Different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at p<0.05.