Literature DB >> 29722079

Electrodermal activity patterns in sleep stages and their utility for sleep versus wake classification.

Anne Herlan1, Jörg Ottenbacher2, Johannes Schneider3, Dieter Riemann1, Bernd Feige1.   

Abstract

As the prevalence of sleep disorders is increasing, new methods for ambulatory sleep measurement are required. This paper presents electrodermal activity in different sleep stages and a sleep detection algorithm based on electrodermal activity. We analysed electrodermal activity and polysomnographic data of 43 healthy subjects and 48 patients with sleep disorders. Electrodermal activity was measured using an ambulatory device worn at the wrist. Two parameters to describe electrodermal activity were defined based on previous literature: EDASEF (electrodermal activity-smoothed feature) as parameter for skin conductance level; and EDAcounts (number of electrodermal activity-peaks) as skin conductance responses. Analysis of variance indicated significant EDASEF differences between the sleep stages wake versus N1, wake versus N2, wake versus slow-wave sleep, and wake versus rapid eye movement. The analysis of EDAcounts also showed significant differences, especially in the stages slow-wave sleep versus rapid eye movement. Between healthy subjects and patients, a significant disparity of EDAcounts was revealed in stage N1. Furthermore, the variances of EDASEF and EDAcounts in N1, N2 slow-wave sleep and rapid eye movement were higher in the patient group (p [F test] < .05). Next, an electrodermal activity-based sleep/wake discriminating algorithm was constructed. The optimized algorithm achieved an average sensitivity and specificity for sleep detection of 97% and 75%. The epoch agreement rate (average accuracy) was 86%. These outcomes are comparative to sleep detection algorithms based on actigraphy or heart rate variability. The results of this study indicate that electrodermal activity is not only a robust parameter for describing sleep, but also a potential suitable method for ambulatory sleep monitoring.
© 2018 European Sleep Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  galvanic skin response; skin resistance; sleep/wake identification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29722079     DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sleep Res        ISSN: 0962-1105            Impact factor:   3.981


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sensors Capabilities, Performance, and Use of Consumer Sleep Technology.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Nicola Cellini; Luca Menghini; Michela Sarlo; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2020-01-03

Review 2.  Wearable Sleep Technology in Clinical and Research Settings.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Nicola Cellini; Aimée Goldstone; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Dormio: A targeted dream incubation device.

Authors:  Adam Haar Horowitz; Tony J Cunningham; Pattie Maes; Robert Stickgold
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2020-05-30

4.  Presleep Arousal and Sleep in Early Childhood.

Authors:  Caroline P Hoyniak; Maureen M McQuillan; John E Bates; Angela D Staples; A J Schwichtenberg; Sarah M Honaker
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.333

5.  Soft Wireless Bioelectronics and Differential Electrodermal Activity for Home Sleep Monitoring.

Authors:  Hojoong Kim; Shinjae Kwon; Young-Tae Kwon; Woon-Hong Yeo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Dream engineering: Simulating worlds through sensory stimulation.

Authors:  Michelle Carr; Adam Haar; Judith Amores; Pedro Lopes; Guillermo Bernal; Tomás Vega; Oscar Rosello; Abhinandan Jain; Pattie Maes
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2020-07-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.