Literature DB >> 29722057

A systematic review of effort-reward imbalance among health workers.

Huy Nguyen Van1, Mai Dinh Le2, Thanh Nguyen Van3, Dung Nguyen Ngoc4, Anh Tran Thi Ngoc5, Phuong Nguyen The6.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to systematically collate effort-reward imbalance (ERI) rates among health workers internationally and to assess gender differences. The effort-reward (ER) ratio ranges quite widely from 0.47 up to 1.32 and the ERI rate from 3.5% to 80.7%. Many studies suggested that health workers contribute more than they are rewarded, especially in Japan, Vietnam, Greece, and Germany-with ERI rates of 57.1%, 32.3%, 80.7%, and 22.8% to 27.6%, respectively. Institutions can utilize systems such as the new appraisal and reward system, which is based on performance rather than the traditional system, seniority, which creates a more competitive working climate and generates insecurity. Additionally, an increased workload and short stay patients are realities for workers in a health care environment, while the structure of human resources for health care remains inadequate. Gender differences within the ER ratio can be explained by the continued impact of traditional gender roles on attitudes and motivations that place more pressure to succeed for men rather than for women. This systematic review provides some valued evidence for public health strategies to improve the ER balance among health workers in general as well as between genders in particular. An innovative approach for managing human resources for health care is necessary to motivate and value contributions made by health workers.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  effort-reward (ER); effort-reward imbalance (ERI); health workers; human resources for health; systematic review

Year:  2018        PMID: 29722057     DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage        ISSN: 0749-6753


  5 in total

1.  Are there differences between officers and ratings on merchant vessels concerning effort-reward imbalance: a cross-sectional maritime field study.

Authors:  Marcus Oldenburg; Hans-Joachim Jensen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Exploring effort-reward imbalance and professional quality of life among health workers in Cape Town, South Africa: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  N Jensen; C Lund; Z Abrahams
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  Translation, validation and psychometric properties of Effort-Reward Imbalance questionnaire among nurses in Vietnam.

Authors:  Phuong The Nguyen; Huy Van Nguyen; Phuong Mai Le; Huyen Thi Phung; An Thi Minh Dao; Kuniyoshi Hayashi; Stuart Gilmour
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-12-28

4.  Effort-Reward Imbalance in Emergency Department Physicians: Prevalence and Associated Factors.

Authors:  Mengge Tian; Xuan Zhou; Xiaoxv Yin; Nan Jiang; Yafei Wu; Jiali Zhang; Chuanzhu Lv; Yanhong Gong
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-07

5.  Symptoms in Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 Epidemic. A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Nicola Magnavita; Giovanni Tripepi; Reparata Rosa Di Prinzio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.