Literature DB >> 29721464

Unicompartmental knee replacement in patients aged 70 years and older.

Alberto Ventura1, Claudio Legnani2, Enrico Borgo1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The management of isolated unicompartmental osteoarthritis in the patient aged 70 years and older is an issue of debate. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of patients aged over 70 years who underwent unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) for the treatment of isolated unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The hypothesis was that this represents a safe and viable procedure leading to improved functional outcome in elderly patients affected by isolated unicompartmental osteoarthritis.
METHODS: 22 consecutive medial compartment UKRs performed between 1998 and 2008 were retrospectively evaluated. Mean age was 74 years (range 70-93 years). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and after an average follow-up of 6.2 years (range 2 to 8). Assessment included KOOS score, WOMAC score, Knee Society Score. Standard X-rays were performed prior to surgery and at follow-up.
RESULTS: Twenty patients showed a statistically significant improvement in all parameters. One patient who was 93 years old at the time of surgery died for unrelated causes. One patient required conversion to a total knee arthroplasty. DISCUSSION: UKR is a safe and clinically effective procedure, which has been proven valuable for the treatment of elderly patients with isolated unicompartmental osteoarthritis and with initial degenerative signs in the other compartments.
CONCLUSION: Age more than 70 does not appear to be a contraindication to the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (case series).

Entities:  

Keywords:  elderly people; medial knee osteoarthritis; unicompartmental osteoarthritis; unycondilar knee replacement

Year:  2018        PMID: 29721464      PMCID: PMC5908339          DOI: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J        ISSN: 2240-4554


  20 in total

1.  Function of the anterior cruciate ligament after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an in vitro robotic study.

Authors:  Jeremy F Suggs; Guoan Li; Sang Eun Park; Scott Steffensmeier; Harry E Rubash; Andrew A Freiberg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy.

Authors:  Charles A Willis-Owen; Klaus Brust; Helen Alsop; Marisa Miraldo; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas M Brown; Neil P Sheth; Kenneth Davis; Mike E Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal - Basic principles and recommendations in clinical and field Science Research: 2016 Update.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Francesco Oliva; Antonio Frizziero; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-05-19

6.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in octogenarians: survival longer than the patient.

Authors:  Alexander P Sah; Bryan D Springer; Richard D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Five-year clinical and radiological outcomes in 257 consecutive cementless Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J Blaney; H Harty; E Doran; S O'Brien; J Hill; I Dobie; D Beverland
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision.

Authors:  I Jahromi; N P Walton; P J Dobson; P L Lewis; D G Campbell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement.

Authors:  P N Baker; D J Deehan; D Lees; S Jameson; P J Avery; P J Gregg; M R Reed
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-08

10.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure.

Authors:  E M Roos; H P Roos; L S Lohmander; C Ekdahl; B D Beynnon
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Anurag Mittal; Prashant Meshram; Woo Hyun Kim; Sang Min Choi
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-07

2.  Return to sports activity after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy in patients aged 70 years and older.

Authors:  Akio Otoshi; Ken Kumagai; Shunsuke Yamada; Shuntaro Nejima; Takahiro Fujisawa; Kazuma Miyatake; Yutaka Inaba
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.