| Literature DB >> 29721296 |
Pieternella C Luttikhuizen1, Freek H M van den Heuvel2, Céline Rebours3,4, Harry J Witte5, Judith D L van Bleijswijk2,5, Klaas Timmermans2,6.
Abstract
Kelp aquaculture is globally developing steadily as human food source, along with other applications. One of the newer crop species is Saccharina latissima, a northern hemisphere kelp inhabiting temperate to arctic rocky shores. To protect and document its natural genetic variation at the onset of this novel aquaculture, as well as increase knowledge on its taxonomy and phylogeography, we collected new genetic data, both nuclear and mitochondrial, and combined it with previous knowledge to estimate genetic connectivity and infer colonization history. Isolation-with-migration coalescent analyses demonstrate that gene flow among the sampled locations is virtually nonexistent. An updated scenario for the origin and colonization history of S. latissima is developed as follows: We propose that the species (or species complex) originated in the northwest Pacific, crossed to the northeast Pacific in the Miocene, and then crossed the Bering Strait after its opening ~5.5 Ma into the Arctic and northeast Atlantic. It subsequently crossed the Atlantic from east to west. During the Pleistocene, it was compressed in the south with evidence for northern refugia in Europe. Postglacial recolonization led to secondary contact in the Canadian Arctic. Saccharina cichorioides is shown to probably belong to the S. latissima species complex and to derive from ancestral populations in the Asian North Pacific. Our novel approach of comparing inferred gene flow based on coalescent analysis versus Wright's island model suggests that equilibrium levels of differentiation have not yet been reached in Europe and, hence, that genetic differentiation is expected to increase further if populations are left undisturbed.Entities:
Keywords: aquaculture; connectivity; conservation genetics; phylogeography; population genetics—empirical
Year: 2018 PMID: 29721296 PMCID: PMC5916297 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Sea belt Saccharina latissima with centimeter scale. Photograph credit: Céline Rebours
Summary of sampling locations and genetic diversity in Saccharina latissima samples
| Location | Sampling date | Coordinates | COI | Microsatellites | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| π |
|
|
| ||||
| SL | Bodø, Norway | 2 October 2013 | 67°04′27″N 14°06′43″E | 19 | 1 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 31 | −0.0826 |
| SN | Solund, Norway | September/October 2013 | 61°12′50″N 4°54′02″E | 29 | 1 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 29 | 0.131 |
| SF1 | Faroe Islands, wild | 9 February 2015 | 62°15′21″N 6°57′14″W | 17 | 1 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 18 | −0.0986 |
| SF2 | Faroe Islands, culture | idem | idem | 13 | 2 | 0.000237 ± 0.000396 | 0.1538 ± 0.1261 | 14 | 0.0634 |
| SS | Oban, Scotland, UK | 4 March 2014 | 56°23′52″N 5°30′59″W | 3 | 2 | 0.001027 ± 0.001281 | 0.6667 ± 0.3143 | 6 | n.a. |
| SD | Grenaa, Denmark | 21 October 2014 | 56°23′52″N 10°55′14″E | 22 | 3 | 0.000520 ± 0.000599 | 0.3247 ± 0.1173 | 22 | 0.173 |
| SW | Marsdiep, the Netherlands | February/August 2013 | 53°00′07″N 4°47′14″E | 25 | 1 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 30 | 0.383 |
| SI | Galway, Ireland | 15 July 2014 | 53°14′24″N 9°18′35″W | 30 | 2 | 0.000103 ± 0.000243 | 0.0667 ± 0.0613 | 30 | −0.0124 |
| SB | Brittany, France | 8 May 2014 | 48°42′30″N 3°49′23″W | 33 | 2 | 0.000093 ± 0.000230 | 0.0606 ± 0.0564 | 33 | 0.116 |
| 191 | 7 | 213 | |||||||
N, number of individuals genotyped; N h, number of haplotypes; π, nucleotide diversity; h, haplotype diversity; F IS, inbreeding coefficient.
Figure 2Maps of study area showing geographical distribution of COI haplotypes in Saccharina latissima: (a) northern hemisphere view; (b) close‐up of northeast Atlantic. In top panel, sampling locations are indicated by transparent ovals inside each pie chart location abbreviation (see Table 1) and sample sizes are shown. In bottom panel, sampling locations are shown by lines; next to pie charts location abbreviations, COI sample size and microsatellite sample size (in brackets) are shown. Haplotype relationships can be seen in Figure 3
Figure 3Minimum spanning network among COI haplotypes (623 bp) for Saccharina latissima. Haplotypes a–g from this study; h–r from (McDevit & Saunders, 2010), s–v from (Balakirev et al., 2012)
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA): fixation indices (top panel) and pairwise sample comparisons (bottom panel: below diagonal for microsatellite markers, above diagonal for COI sequences). In brackets are values for AMOVA excluding Faroe culture line (CL) samples. All fixation indices are significantly larger than zero (top panel, in bold). Fixation indices for pairwise population comparisons in bold (bottom panel) are significantly different from zero after Bonferroni correction. MV, percentage of molecular variance
| Overall differentiation | ||
|---|---|---|
| MV | ||
| ΦST |
| 94% (93%) |
| FST |
| 32% (27%) |
| FIS |
| 62% (53%) |
| FIT |
| 6% (20%) |
Figure 4Principal coordinates analysis on microsatellite data for Saccharina latissima. For abbreviations of sampling locations, see Table 1
Maximum posterior probability estimates in demographic units for isolation‐with‐migration simulations: (A) large‐scale comparisons across the Atlantic Ocean (mitochondrial COI sequences), (B) small‐scale comparisons among European samples (microsatellite markers). For details of simulations, see text. N = thousands of individuals in population represented by sample x (estimated effective population size); T = population subdivision time (years); m a>b = forward‐in‐time migration rate from a (left sample in first column) to b (right sample in first column) (numbers of individuals per generation); n.e. = not estimated
| A | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample pair |
|
|
|
|
|
| SB vs. SF | 0.174 × 106 (0.171–0.176) | 126 (124–129) | 121 (116–124) | n.e. | n.e. |
| SB vs. NWA | 1.29 × 106 (1.22–1.32) | 145 (136–154) | 788 (776–797) | n.e. | n.e. |
| SF vs. NWA | 1.61 × 106 (1.55–1.68) | 114 (109–120) | 780 (778–783) | n.e. | n.e. |
| B | |||||
| SL vs. SN | 7 | 39.37 | 18.12 | 3.07 | 0.144 |
| SL vs. SF1 | 77 | 13.12 | 50.62 | 0.430 | 0.0294 |
| SL vs. SD | 4 | 4.38 | 25.62 | 0.0911 | 2.25 |
| SL vs. SW | 122 | 59.37 | 0.63 | 0.0347 | 0.0164 |
| SL vs. SI | 88 | 59.37 | 30.62 | 0.602 | 1.485 |
| SL vs. SB | 38 | 36.87 | 26.87 | 0.0730 | 0.222 |
| SN vs. SF1 | 118 | 54.37 | 45.62 | 0.00563 | 2.78 |
| SN vs. SD | 19 | 16.87 | 40.62 | 0.249 | 0.775 |
| SN vs. SW | 153 | 56.87 | 0.63 | 0.00113 | 0.0194 |
| SN vs. SI | 18 | 58.12 | 35.62 | 3.11 | 0.655 |
| SN vs. SB | 242 | 30.62 | 33.12 | 0.448 | 0.0788 |
| SF1 vs. SD | 24 | 24.37 | 100.60 | 0.00456 | 0.125 |
| SF1 vs. SW | 41 | 19.37 | 0.63 | 0.258 | 0.0294 |
| SF1 vs. SI | 88 | 63.12 | 119.40 | 0.0559 | 2.23 |
| SF1 vs. SB | 264 | 49.37 | 28.12 | 0.266 | 0.419 |
| SD vs. SW | 106 | 14.37 | 0.63 | 0.0587 | 0.0107 |
| SD vs. SI | 11 | 10.62 | 83.12 | 0.0854 | 0.625 |
| SD vs. SB | 100 | 40.62 | 10.62 | 0.156 | 0.239 |
| SW vs. SI | 5 | 211.90 | 0.625 | 0.309 | 0.0676 |
| SW vs. SB | 156 | 58.12 | 1.88 | 1.21 | 0.0400 |
| SI vs. SB | 375 | 40.62 | 59.37 | 0.8065 | 0.987 |
Figure 5Genetic connectivity estimated using coalescent isolation‐with‐migration analyses versus traditional approach based on Wright's island model; the former does not and the latter does assume that equilibrium between isolation and migration has been reached. Dashed line indicates x = y; solid line is linear regression trend line with 95% confidence interval (gray area)